There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
In this brief report, we described some uncommon cytomorphological features of malignant
mesothelioma (MM) cells in pleural effusions. The tumor cells exhibited abundant cytoplasmic
vacuolization, with presence of single or multiple eccentric nuclei in several cells.
In the Giemsa‐stained smear, we observed a glossy spherical material in some cells,
which tested positive in Sudan III stain. In immunocytochemical analysis, tumor cells
were positive for calretinin, podoplanin, epithelial membrane antigen, and methylthioadenosine
phosphorylase; tumor cells were negative for BRCA1‐associated protein 1, CD68, and
desmin. The intracytoplasmic vacuoles were positive for adipophilin expression.
Over the past few years several investigators have independently described unique low-grade renal epithelial neoplasms with clear cytoplasm, focal to diffuse papillary architecture, and occasional leiomyomatous stromal metaplasia that are not currently recognized in the World Health Organization classification of renal tumors. These tumors have been referred to by a variety of names including clear-cell papillary renal cell carcinoma and recently "clear-cell tubulopapillary renal cell carcinoma". On the basis of the available data, such tumors are positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), while being negative for CD10, α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), and TFE3. These tumors reportedly lack trisomies of chromosomes 7 and 17, deletions of 3p25, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene mutations, and VHL promoter hypermethylation. Herein, we report on nine cases of this tumor emphasizing detailed studies of the VHL gene and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway. Molecular studies performed included VHL mutational analysis, copy number changes assessed using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays, and qRT-PCR for VHL mRNA expression. Immunohistochemical stains for markers of HIF pathway activation (HIF-1α, CA9, and glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1)) as well as other relevant markers (CK7, CD10, AMACR, and TFE3) were performed. None of our tumors harbored VHL gene mutations, losses of chromosomal region 3p25, or trisomies of chromosomes 7 or 17. VHL mRNA was overexpressed in our tumors relative to normal renal tissue and clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. All cases showed strong co-expression of CK7, HIF-1α, GLUT-1, and CA9. No expression of TFE3, CD10, or AMACR was seen. The morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of these unique low-grade tumors are sufficiently distinct to allow separation from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes. The co-expression of CA9, HIF-1α, and GLUT-1 in the absence of VHL gene alterations in clear-cell papillary renal cell carcinoma suggests activation of the HIF pathway by non-VHL-dependent mechanisms.
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a uniformly fatal tumour of mesothelial cells. MM is caused by exposure to asbestos however most individuals with documented asbestos exposure do not develop MM. Although MM appears to aggregate within families, the genetics of MM susceptibility is a relatively unexplored area. The aim of the current study was to identify genetic factors that contribute to MM risk. A genome-wide association analysis of 2,508,203 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 428 MM cases and 1269 controls from Western Australia was performed. Additional genotyping was performed on a sample of 778 asbestos-exposed Western Australian controls. Replication of the most strongly associated SNPs was undertaken in an independent case-control study of 392 asbestos-exposed cases and 367 asbestos-exposed controls from Italy. No SNPs achieved formal genome-wide statistical significance in the Western Australian study. However, suggestive results for MM risk were identified in the SDK1, CRTAM and RASGRF2 genes, and in the 2p12 chromosomal region. These findings were not replicated in the Italian study, although there was some evidence of replication in the region of SDK1. These suggestive associations will be further investigated in sequencing and functional studies.
Cytology effusions are often the only material available for diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, the cytomorphological features alone are not always diagnostic, and cytology samples preclude an assessment for pleural tissue invasion. Accordingly, immunohistochemical, soluble, and molecular biomarkers have been developed. The aim of this study is to provide quantitative evidence regarding the diagnostic performance of novel biomarkers. To that end, a systematic literature review was performed of articles dealing with a loss of BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1), methylthioadenosine (MTAP), 5-hydroxymethylcitosine (5-hmC), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), insulin like-growth factor II messenger RNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3), enhanced zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) staining, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) homozygous deletion (HD) testing, soluble mesothelin, and microRNA quantification in cytological samples for the diagnosis of MPM versus reactive atypical mesothelial cells. Sensitivity and specificity were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed. The quality of the studies was assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Seventy-one studies were included. BAP1 loss showed a sensitivity of 0.65 (confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.71) and a specificity of 0.99 (CI, 0.93-1.00). MTAP loss and p16 HD showed 100% specificity with sensitivities of 0.47 (CI, 0.38-0.57) and 0.62 (CI, 0.53-0.71), respectively. BAP1 loss and CDKN2A HD combined showed maximal specificity and a sensitivity of 0.83 (CI, 0.78-0.89). GLUT1 and IMP3 showed sensitivities of 0.82 (CI, 0.70-0.90) and 0.65 (CI, 0.41-0.90), respectively, with comparable specificity. Mesothelin showed a sensitivity of 0.73 (CI, 0.68-0.77) and a specificity of 0.90 (CI, 0.84-0.93). In conclusion, some of the recently emerging biomarkers are close to 1.00 specificity. Their moderate sensitivity on their own, however, can be significantly improved by the use of 2 biomarkers, such as a combination of BAP1 and CDKN2A with fluorescence in situ hybridization or a combination of BAP1 and MTAP immunohistochemistry.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.