Validity and calibration of the FFQ used in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the FFQ administered to participants in the follow-up of the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS), and to provide calibration coefficients.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Public Health Nutr

Title: Public health nutrition

Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

ISSN (Electronic): 1475-2727

ISSN (Print): 1368-9800

Publication date (Electronic): September 2016

Volume: 19

Issue: 13

Affiliations

[1 ] 1Cancer Epidemiology Centre,Cancer Council Victoria,615 St Kilda Road,Melbourne,Victoria 3004,Australia.

[2 ] 3Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine,Nursing and Health Sciences,Monash University,Melbourne,Victoria,Australia.

[3 ] 2Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Victoria,Australia.

Article

Publisher Item ID: S1368980016000690

DOI: 10.1017/S1368980016000690

PubMed ID: 27075344

SO-VID: 3d7818cd-555d-4718-a687-ebbe735efd34

History

Keywords: FFQ,Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study,Validation,Calibration,Dietary Calibration Study,Dietary recall

Data availability:

Keywords: FFQ, Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study, Validation, Calibration, Dietary Calibration Study, Dietary recall

Validity and calibration of the FFQ used in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.

Read this article at

Abstract

Related collections

NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion

Author and article information

Journal

Affiliations

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Cited by 31