1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Homes Heat Health protocol: an observational cohort study measuring the effect of summer temperatures on sleep quality

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Quality sleep is essential to our health and well-being. Summertime temperatures in the bedrooms of homes in temperate climates are increasing, especially in city apartments. There is very little empirical evidence of the effect of temperature on sleep when people are sleeping in their own bedroom. The Homes Heat Health project seeks to develop a measurable definition of temperature-related sleep disturbance and the effects on health, and so produce a credible criterion for identifying overheating in new and existing homes.

          Methods and analysis

          A cohort of at least 95 people that live in London apartments and who are free of significant personal and health factors that could affect sleep are being recruited for an ongoing observational cohort study. A baseline questionnaire determines their customary sleep patterns and health. The geometrical form and thermal characteristics of their apartments is being recorded along with temperature, relative humidity and in some apartments CO 2 levels, throughout one summer. Actigraphy records nightly sleep disturbance and every morning an app-based diary captures perceived sleep quality. Questionnaires following spells of hot weather capture changes in sleep pattern, sleep quality, and consequential health and well-being.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The study protocol was approved by the Loughborough University ethics committee. The participants will receive both verbal and written information explaining the purpose of the study, what is expected of them, the incentives for participating and the feedback that will be provided. The results will be reported bi-annually to a project advisory board. Presentations will be made at conferences and the methods, intermediary and final results, in academic journals. Informing government bodies, professional organisations, construction industry representatives and housing providers is of particular importance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

          While considerable attention has focused on improving the detection of depression, assessment of severity is also important in guiding treatment decisions. Therefore, we examined the validity of a brief, new measure of depression severity. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day). The PHQ-9 was completed by 6,000 patients in 8 primary care clinics and 7 obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Construct validity was assessed using the 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey, self-reported sick days and clinic visits, and symptom-related difficulty. Criterion validity was assessed against an independent structured mental health professional (MHP) interview in a sample of 580 patients. As PHQ-9 depression severity increased, there was a substantial decrease in functional status on all 6 SF-20 subscales. Also, symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and health care utilization increased. Using the MHP reinterview as the criterion standard, a PHQ-9 score > or =10 had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for major depression. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represented mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively. Results were similar in the primary care and obstetrics-gynecology samples. In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity. These characteristics plus its brevity make the PHQ-9 a useful clinical and research tool.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

            Despite the prevalence of sleep complaints among psychiatric patients, few questionnaires have been specifically designed to measure sleep quality in clinical populations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. Clinical and clinimetric properties of the PSQI were assessed over an 18-month period with "good" sleepers (healthy subjects, n = 52) and "poor" sleepers (depressed patients, n = 54; sleep-disorder patients, n = 62). Acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency (test-retest reliability), and validity were obtained. A global PSQI score greater than 5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p less than 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers. The clinimetric and clinical properties of the PSQI suggest its utility both in psychiatric clinical practice and research activities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The consensus sleep diary: standardizing prospective sleep self-monitoring.

              To present an expert consensus, standardized, patient-informed sleep diary. Sleep diaries from the original expert panel of 25 attendees of the Pittsburgh Assessment Conference(1) were collected and reviewed. A smaller subset of experts formed a committee and reviewed the compiled diaries. Items deemed essential were included in a Core sleep diary, and those deemed optional were retained for an expanded diary. Secondly, optional items would be available in other versions. A draft of the Core and optional versions along with a feedback questionnaire were sent to members of the Pittsburgh Assessment Conference. The feedback from the group was integrated and the diary drafts were subjected to 6 focus groups composed of good sleepers, people with insomnia, and people with sleep apnea. The data were summarized into themes and changes to the drafts were made in response to the focus groups. The resultant draft was evaluated by another focus group and subjected to lexile analyses. The lexile analyses suggested that the Core diary instructions are at a sixth-grade reading level and the Core diary was written at a third-grade reading level. The Consensus Sleep Diary was the result of collaborations with insomnia experts and potential users. The adoption of a standard sleep diary for insomnia will facilitate comparisons across studies and advance the field. The proposed diary is intended as a living document which still needs to be tested, refined, and validated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2024
                4 July 2024
                : 14
                : 7
                : e086797
                Affiliations
                [1] Ringgold_5156Loughborough University , Loughborough, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Kevin Lomas; k.j.lomas@ 123456lboro.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5792-0762
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-2502
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-9951
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-9096
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-3480
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-8006
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-213X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7126-1879
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6653-9071
                Article
                bmjopen-2024-086797
                10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086797
                11227782
                38964790
                3d781688-f7d2-46ff-a9e6-daf2c0f5c7a2
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 March 2024
                : 11 June 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council;
                Award ID: EP/W031736/1
                Categories
                Public Health
                1506
                1724
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                public health,sleep medicine,climate change
                Medicine
                public health, sleep medicine, climate change

                Comments

                Comment on this article