28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High Level of Viral Suppression and Low Switch Rate to Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy among HIV-Infected Adult Patients Followed over Five Years: Retrospective Analysis of the DART Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In contrast to resource-rich countries, most HIV-infected patients in resource-limited countries receive treatment without virological monitoring. There are few long-term data, in this setting, on rates of viral suppression or switch to second-line antiretroviral therapy. The DART trial compared clinically driven monitoring (CDM) versus routine laboratory (CD4/haematology/biochemistry) and clinical monitoring (LCM) in HIV-infected adults initiating therapy. There was no virological monitoring in either study group during follow-up, but viral load was measured in Ugandan participants at trial closure. Two thousand three hundred and seventeen (2317) participants from this country initiated antiretroviral therapy with zidovudine/lamivudine plus tenofovir (n = 1717), abacavir (n = 300), or nevirapine (n = 300). Of 1896 (81.8%) participants who were alive and in follow-up at trial closure (median 5.1 years after therapy initiation), 1507 (79.5%) were on first-line and 389 (20.5%) on second-line antiretroviral therapy. The overall switch rate after the first year was 5.6 per 100 person-years; the rate was substantially higher in participants with low baseline CD4 counts (<50 cells/mm 3). Among 1207 (80.1%) first-line participants with viral load measured, HIV RNA was <400 copies/ml in 963 (79.8%), 400–999 copies/ml in 37 (3.1%), 1,000–9,999 copies/ml in 110 (9.1%), and ≥10,000 copies/ml in 97 (8.0%). The proportion with HIV RNA <400 copies/ml was slightly lower (difference 7.1%, 95% CI 2.5 to 11.5%) in CDM (76.3%) than in LCM (83.4%). Among 252 (64.8%) second-line participants with viral load measured (median 2.3 years after switch), HIV RNA was <400 copies/ml in 226 (89.7%), with no difference between monitoring strategies. Low switch rates and high, sustained levels of viral suppression are achievable without viral load or CD4 count monitoring in the context of high-quality clinical care.

          Trial Registration:

          ISRCTN13968779

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          HIV and inflammation: mechanisms and consequences.

          Persistent immune activation and inflammation despite sustained antiretroviral therapy (ART)-mediated viral suppression has emerged as a major challenge of the modern HIV treatment era. While immune activation, inflammatory, and coagulation markers typically decline during suppressive ART, they remain abnormally elevated in many HIV-infected individuals and predict subsequent mortality and non-AIDS morbidities including cardiovascular disease. The goal of this review is to summarize the current state of our knowledge regarding the underlying causes of persistent immune activation during ART-mediated viral suppression as well as the link between persistent immune activation and morbidity and mortality in this setting. Several recent studies have linked surrogate markers of this persistent inflammatory state to clinical outcomes, validating persistent immune activation as a viable therapeutic target. Other recent studies have helped clarify the roles of persistent HIV expression and/or replication, microbial translocation, and co-infections in driving this persistent inflammatory state, identifying targets for novel interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: comparison of programmes with and without viral load monitoring.

            In high-income countries, viral load is routinely measured to detect failure of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and guide switching to second-line ART. Viral load monitoring is not generally available in resource-limited settings. We examined switching from nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based first-line regimens to protease inhibitor-based regimens in Africa, South America and Asia. Multicohort study of 17 ART programmes. All sites monitored CD4 cell count and had access to second-line ART and 10 sites monitored viral load. We compared times to switching, CD4 cell counts at switching and obtained adjusted hazard ratios for switching (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from random-effects Weibull models. A total of 20 113 patients, including 6369 (31.7%) patients from 10 programmes with access to viral load monitoring, were analysed; 576 patients (2.9%) switched. Low CD4 cell counts at ART initiation were associated with switching in all programmes. Median time to switching was 16.3 months [interquartile range (IQR) 10.1-26.6] in programmes with viral load monitoring and 21.8 months (IQR 14.0-21.8) in programmes without viral load monitoring (P < 0.001). Median CD4 cell counts at switching were 161 cells/microl (IQR 77-265) in programmes with viral load monitoring and 102 cells/microl (44-181) in programmes without viral load monitoring (P < 0.001). Switching was more common in programmes with viral load monitoring during months 7-18 after starting ART (aHR 1.38; 95% CI 0.97-1.98), similar during months 19-30 (aHR 0.97; 95% CI 0.58-1.60) and less common during months 31-42 (aHR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.79). In resource-limited settings, switching to second-line regimens tends to occur earlier and at higher CD4 cell counts in ART programmes with viral load monitoring compared with programmes without viral load monitoring. 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              HIV viral load monitoring in resource-limited regions: optional or necessary?

              Although it is a standard practice in high-income countries, determination of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) load is not recommended in developing countries because of the costs and technical constraints. As more and more countries establish capacity to provide second-line therapy, and as costs and technological constraints associated with viral load testing decrease, the question of whether determination of the viral load is necessary deserves attention. Viral load testing could increase in importance as a guide for clinical decisions on when to switch to second-line treatment and on how to optimize the duration of the first-line treatment regimen. In addition, the viral load is a particularly useful tool for monitoring adherence to treatment, performing sentinel surveillance, and diagnosing HIV infection in children aged <18 months. Rather than considering viral load data to be an unaffordable luxury, efforts should be made to ensure that viral load testing becomes affordable, simple, and easy to use in resource-limited settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                13 March 2014
                : 9
                : 3
                : e90772
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda
                [2 ]MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ]School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Australia
                [4 ]Infectious Diseases Institute, Mulago, Uganda
                [5 ]MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda
                [6 ]University College London, London, United Kingdom
                Massachusetts General Hospital, United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have the following interests: GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Abbott Laboratories donated drugs for DART. GlaxoSmithKline donated Combivir and abacavir; Gilead Sciences donated tenofovir; Boehringer-Ingelheim donated nevirapine; Abbott Laboratories donated Kaletra/Aluvia. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CK DMG ASW DTD. Performed the experiments: CK IM PK RK PM. Analyzed the data: DD RLG ASW. Wrote the paper: CK DTD CFG ASW DMG DP.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-28629
                10.1371/journal.pone.0090772
                3953124
                24625508
                3cff5ca0-3555-4031-b670-e04bc4822673
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 1 July 2013
                : 5 February 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                This work was supported by the United Kingdom (UK) Medical Research Council [grant number G0600344], the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Rockefeller Foundation. GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Abbott Laboratories donated drugs for DART. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine
                Infectious Diseases
                Viral Diseases
                HIV

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content123

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors426