19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Mechanisms for stalled replication fork stabilization: new targets for synthetic lethality strategies in cancer treatments

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1
      EMBO reports
      EMBO

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p id="d4657437e257">Timely and faithful duplication of the entire genome depends on completion of replication. Replication forks frequently encounter obstacles that may cause genotoxic fork stalling. Nevertheless, failure to complete replication rarely occurs under normal conditions, which is attributed to an intricate network of proteins that serves to stabilize, repair and restart stalled forks. Indeed, many of the components in this network are encoded by tumour suppressor genes, and their loss of function by mutation or deletion generates genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer. Paradoxically, the same fork‐protective network also confers resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs that induce high‐level replication stress. Here, we review the mechanisms and major pathways rescuing stalled replication forks, with a focus on fork stabilization preventing fork collapse. A coherent understanding of how cells protect their replication forks will not only provide insight into how cells maintain genome stability, but also unravel potential therapeutic targets for cancers refractory to conventional chemotherapies. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references129

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends.

          Formation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) tails at a double-strand break (DSB) is a key step in homologous recombination and DNA-damage signaling. The enzyme(s) producing ssDNA at DSBs in eukaryotes remain unknown. We monitored 5'-strand resection at inducible DSB ends in yeast and identified proteins required for two stages of resection: initiation and long-range 5'-strand resection. We show that the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex (MRX) initiates 5' degradation, whereas Sgs1 and Dna2 degrade 5' strands exposing long 3' strands. Deletion of SGS1 or DNA2 reduces resection and DSB repair by single-strand annealing between distant repeats while the remaining long-range resection activity depends on the exonuclease Exo1. In exo1Deltasgs1Delta double mutants, the MRX complex together with Sae2 nuclease generate, in a stepwise manner, only few hundred nucleotides of ssDNA at the break, resulting in inefficient gene conversion and G2/M damage checkpoint arrest. These results provide important insights into the early steps of DSB repair in eukaryotes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination.

            If replication forks are perturbed, a multifaceted response including several DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways is activated to ensure faithful DNA replication. Here, we show that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) binds to and is activated by stalled replication forks that contain small gaps. PARP1 collaborates with Mre11 to promote replication fork restart after release from replication blocks, most likely by recruiting Mre11 to the replication fork to promote resection of DNA. Both PARP1 and PARP2 are required for hydroxyurea-induced homologous recombination to promote cell survival after replication blocks. Together, our data suggest that PARP1 and PARP2 detect disrupted replication forks and attract Mre11 for end processing that is required for subsequent recombination repair and restart of replication forks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11 dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis

              The role of Rad51 in an unperturbed cell cycle has been difficult to dissect from its DNA repair function. Here, using electron microscopy (EM) to visualize replication intermediates (RIs) assembled in Xenopus laevis egg extract we show that Rad51 is required to prevent the accumulation of ssDNA gaps at replication forks and behind them. ssDNA gaps at forks arise from extended uncoupling of leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. Instead, ssDNA gaps behind forks, which are exacerbated on damaged templates, result from Mre11 dependent degradation of newly synthesized DNA strands as they can be suppressed by inhibition of Mre11 nuclease activity. These findings reveal direct and unanticipated roles for Rad51 at replication forks demonstrating that Rad51 protects newly synthesised DNA from Mre11 dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EMBO reports
                EMBO Rep
                EMBO
                1469-221X
                1469-3178
                July 18 2018
                September 2018
                August 13 2018
                September 2018
                : 19
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacology &amp; Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou China
                [2 ]Science for Life Laboratory Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden
                [3 ]Sheffield Cancer Centre Department of Oncology and Metabolism University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
                Article
                10.15252/embr.201846263
                6123652
                30108055
                3cfc2e3a-b1e8-47e9-9ad7-574fac6001cd
                © 2018

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article