1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Causal effects of gut microbiota on chalazion: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To investigate the causal relationship between gut microbiota (GM) and chalazion through Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

          Methods

          GM-related genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were obtained from the International Consortium MiBioGen. Genetic data for chalazion were sourced from the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) Open GWAS database. Five MR methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), were employed to estimate causal relationships. Cochran’s Q test was used to detect heterogeneity, the MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO regression were utilized to detect horizontal pleiotropy, and the leave-one-out method was employed to validate data stability.

          Results

          We identified 1,509 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 119 genera as instrumental variables (IVs) ( p < 1 × 10 −5). According to the inverse variance weighted (IVW) estimate, the Family XIII AD3011 group (OR = 1.0018, 95% CI 1.0002–1.0035, p = 0.030) and Catenibacterium (OR = 1.0013, 95% CI 1.0002–1.0025, p = 0.022) were potentially associated with increased risk of chalazion. Conversely, Veillonella (OR = 0.9986, 95% CI 0.9974–0.9999, p = 0.036) appeared to provide protection against chalazion. There was no evidence of heterogeneity or pleiotropy.

          Conclusion

          This study uncovered the causal relationship between GM and chalazion, pinpointing Catenibacterium and Family XIII AD3011 group as potential risk contributors, while highlighting Veillonella as a protective factor. In-depth investigation into the potential mechanisms of specific bacteria in chalazion was essential for providing novel therapeutic and preventive strategies in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator

          ABSTRACT Developments in genome‐wide association studies and the increasing availability of summary genetic association data have made application of Mendelian randomization relatively straightforward. However, obtaining reliable results from a Mendelian randomization investigation remains problematic, as the conventional inverse‐variance weighted method only gives consistent estimates if all of the genetic variants in the analysis are valid instrumental variables. We present a novel weighted median estimator for combining data on multiple genetic variants into a single causal estimate. This estimator is consistent even when up to 50% of the information comes from invalid instrumental variables. In a simulation analysis, it is shown to have better finite‐sample Type 1 error rates than the inverse‐variance weighted method, and is complementary to the recently proposed MR‐Egger (Mendelian randomization‐Egger) regression method. In analyses of the causal effects of low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol on coronary artery disease risk, the inverse‐variance weighted method suggests a causal effect of both lipid fractions, whereas the weighted median and MR‐Egger regression methods suggest a null effect of high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol that corresponds with the experimental evidence. Both median‐based and MR‐Egger regression methods should be considered as sensitivity analyses for Mendelian randomization investigations with multiple genetic variants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method

            Mendelian randomization-Egger (MR-Egger) is an analysis method for Mendelian randomization using summarized genetic data. MR-Egger consists of three parts: (1) a test for directional pleiotropy, (2) a test for a causal effect, and (3) an estimate of the causal effect. While conventional analysis methods for Mendelian randomization assume that all genetic variants satisfy the instrumental variable assumptions, the MR-Egger method is able to assess whether genetic variants have pleiotropic effects on the outcome that differ on average from zero (directional pleiotropy), as well as to provide a consistent estimate of the causal effect, under a weaker assumption—the InSIDE (INstrument Strength Independent of Direct Effect) assumption. In this paper, we provide a critical assessment of the MR-Egger method with regard to its implementation and interpretation. While the MR-Egger method is a worthwhile sensitivity analysis for detecting violations of the instrumental variable assumptions, there are several reasons why causal estimates from the MR-Egger method may be biased and have inflated Type 1 error rates in practice, including violations of the InSIDE assumption and the influence of outlying variants. The issues raised in this paper have potentially serious consequences for causal inferences from the MR-Egger approach. We give examples of scenarios in which the estimates from conventional Mendelian randomization methods and MR-Egger differ, and discuss how to interpret findings in such cases. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Large-scale association analyses identify host factors influencing human gut microbiome composition

              To study the effect of host genetics on gut microbiome composition, the MiBioGen consortium curated and analyzed genome-wide genotypes and 16S fecal microbiome data from 18,340 individuals (24 cohorts). Microbial composition showed high variability across cohorts: only 9 of 410 genera were detected in more than 95% of samples. A genome-wide association study of host genetic variation regarding microbial taxa identified 31 loci affecting the microbiome at a genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10-8) threshold. One locus, the lactase (LCT) gene locus, reached study-wide significance (genome-wide association study signal: P = 1.28 × 10-20), and it showed an age-dependent association with Bifidobacterium abundance. Other associations were suggestive (1.95 × 10-10 < P < 5 × 10-8) but enriched for taxa showing high heritability and for genes expressed in the intestine and brain. A phenome-wide association study and Mendelian randomization identified enrichment of microbiome trait loci in the metabolic, nutrition and environment domains and suggested the microbiome might have causal effects in ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1598313/overviewRole:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1542270/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2728068/overviewRole: Role:
                Journal
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front. Med.
                Frontiers in Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-858X
                04 June 2024
                2024
                : 11
                : 1411271
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College , Beijing, China
                [2] 2Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences , Beijing, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Panpan Ye, Zhejiang University, China

                Reviewed by: Graham Wallace, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

                Bin Zou, Sun Yat-sen University, China

                *Correspondence: Youxin Chen, chenyx@ 123456pumch.cn
                Article
                10.3389/fmed.2024.1411271
                11183106
                38895185
                3c6ceb04-cda5-4f87-8a63-2d7b01756baf
                Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Gu, Zhao, Wang, Liu, Chen and Zhao.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 April 2024
                : 21 May 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 7, Words: 4732
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China, doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 82271112
                Award ID: 82301241
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271112 and 82301241).
                Categories
                Medicine
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Ophthalmology

                gut microbiota,chalazion,mendelian randomization,inverse variance weighted,single nucleotide polymorphisms

                Comments

                Comment on this article