There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
How much do drug companies spend on research and development to bring a new medicine
to market? In this study, which included 63 of 355 new therapeutic drugs and biologic
agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 2009 and 2018, the
estimated median capitalized research and development cost per product was $985 million,
counting expenditures on failed trials. Data were mainly accessible for smaller firms,
products in certain therapeutic areas, orphan drugs, first-in-class drugs, therapeutic
agents that received accelerated approval, and products approved between 2014 and
2018. This study provides an estimate of research and development costs for new therapeutic
agents based on publicly available data; differences from previous studies may reflect
the spectrum of products analyzed and the restricted availability of data in the public
domain. The mean cost of developing a new drug has been the subject of debate, with
recent estimates ranging from $314 million to $2.8 billion. To estimate the research
and development investment required to bring a new therapeutic agent to market, using
publicly available data. Data were analyzed on new therapeutic agents approved by
the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2009 and 2018 to estimate the research
and development expenditure required to bring a new medicine to market. Data were
accessed from the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Drugs@FDA database, and ClinicalTrials.gov,
alongside published data on clinical trial success rates. Conduct of preclinical and
clinical studies of new therapeutic agents. Median and mean research and development
spending on new therapeutic agents approved by the FDA, capitalized at a real cost
of capital rate (the required rate of return for an investor) of 10.5% per year, with
bootstrapped CIs. All amounts were reported in 2018 US dollars. The FDA approved 355
new drugs and biologics over the study period. Research and development expenditures
were available for 63 (18%) products, developed by 47 different companies. After accounting
for the costs of failed trials, the median capitalized research and development investment
to bring a new drug to market was estimated at $985.3 million (95% CI, $683.6 million-$1228.9
million), and the mean investment was estimated at $1335.9 million (95% CI, $1042.5
million-$1637.5 million) in the base case analysis. Median estimates by therapeutic
area (for areas with ≥5 drugs) ranged from $765.9 million (95% CI, $323.0 million-$1473.5
million) for nervous system agents to $2771.6 million (95% CI, $2051.8 million-$5366.2
million) for antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents. Data were mainly accessible
for smaller firms, orphan drugs, products in certain therapeutic areas, first-in-class
drugs, therapeutic agents that received accelerated approval, and products approved
between 2014 and 2018. Results varied in sensitivity analyses using different estimates
of clinical trial success rates, preclinical expenditures, and cost of capital. This
study provides an estimate of research and development costs for new therapeutic agents
based on publicly available data. Differences from previous studies may reflect the
spectrum of products analyzed, the restricted availability of data in the public domain,
and differences in underlying assumptions in the cost calculations. This study uses
publicly available data to analyze research and development spending to win FDA approval
and bring new drugs to market between 2009 and 2018.
SUMMARY Previous estimates of drug development success rates rely on relatively small samples from databases curated by the pharmaceutical industry and are subject to potential selection biases. Using a sample of 406 038 entries of clinical trial data for over 21 143 compounds from January 1, 2000 to October 31, 2015, we estimate aggregate clinical trial success rates and durations. We also compute disaggregated estimates across several trial features including disease type, clinical phase, industry or academic sponsor, biomarker presence, lead indication status, and time. In several cases, our results differ significantly in detail from widely cited statistics. For example, oncology has a 3.4% success rate in our sample vs. 5.1% in prior studies. However, after declining to 1.7% in 2012, this rate has improved to 2.5% and 8.3% in 2014 and 2015, respectively. In addition, trials that use biomarkers in patient-selection have higher overall success probabilities than trials without biomarkers.
This analysis of US Securities and Exchange Commission filings provides a contemporary estimate of research and development spending to develop 10 new cancer drugs. Question What is the estimated research and development spending for developing a cancer drug? Findings In this analysis of US Securities and Exchange Commission filings for 10 cancer drugs, the median cost of developing a single cancer drug was $648.0 million. The median revenue after approval for such a drug was $1658.4 million. Meaning These results provide a transparent estimate of research and development spending on cancer drugs and show that the revenue since approval is substantially higher than the preapproval research and development spending. Importance A common justification for high cancer drug prices is the sizable research and development (R&D) outlay necessary to bring a drug to the US market. A recent estimate of R&D spending is $2.7 billion (2017 US dollars). However, this analysis lacks transparency and independent replication. Objective To provide a contemporary estimate of R&D spending to develop cancer drugs. Design, Setting, and Participants Analysis of US Securities and Exchange Commission filings for drug companies with no drugs on the US market that received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for a cancer drug from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2015. Cumulative R&D spending was estimated from initiation of drug development activity to date of approval. Earnings were also identified from the time of approval to the present. The study was conducted from December 10, 2016, to March 2, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Median R&D spending on cancer drug development. Results Ten companies and drugs were included in this analysis. The 10 companies had a median time to develop a drug of 7.3 years (range, 5.8-15.2 years). Five drugs (50%) received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration, and 5 (50%) received regular approval. The median cost of drug development was $648.0 million (range, $157.3 million to $1950.8 million). The median cost was $757.4 million (range, $203.6 million to $2601.7 million) for a 7% per annum cost of capital (or opportunity costs) and $793.6 million (range, $219.1 million to $2827.1 million) for a 9% opportunity costs. With a median of 4.0 years (range, 0.8-8.8 years) since approval, the total revenue from sales of these 10 drugs since approval was $67.0 billion compared with total R&D spending of $7.2 billion ($9.1 billion, including 7% opportunity costs). Conclusions and Relevance The cost to develop a cancer drug is $648.0 million, a figure significantly lower than prior estimates. The revenue since approval is substantial (median, $1658.4 million; range, $204.1 million to $22 275.0 million). This analysis provides a transparent estimate of R&D spending on cancer drugs and has implications for the current debate on drug pricing.
For more than a decade, industry analysts and policy makers have raised concerns about declining pharmaceutical innovation, citing declining numbers of new molecular entities (NMEs) approved in the United States each year. Yet there is little consensus on whether this is the best measure of "innovation." We examined NME approvals during 1987-2011 and propose the three distinct subcategories of NMEs--first-in-class, advance-in-class, and addition-to-class--to provide more nuanced and informative insights into underlying trends. We found that trends in NME approvals were largely driven by addition-to-class, or "me too," drug approvals, while first-in-class approvals remained fairly steady over the study period. Moreover, the higher proportion of first-in-class drug approvals over the most recent decade is an encouraging sign of the health of the industry as a whole.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.