20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of type 2 diabetes on bone metabolism

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Diabetes complications and osteoporotic fractures are two of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in older patients and share many features including genetic susceptibility, molecular mechanisms, and environmental factors. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compromises bone microarchitecture by inducing abnormal bone cell function and matrix structure, with increased osteoblast apoptosis, diminished osteoblast differentiation, and enhanced osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The linkage between these two chronic diseases creates a possibility that certain antidiabetic therapies may affect bone quality. Both glycemic and bone homeostasis are under control of common regulatory factors. These factors include insulin, accumulation of advanced glycation end products, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, gastrointestinal hormones (such as the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and the glucagon-like peptides 1 and 2), and bone-derived hormone osteocalcin. This background allows individual pharmacological targets for antidiabetic therapies to affect the bone quality due to their indirect effects on bone cell differentiation and bone remodeling process. Moreover, it’s important to consider the fragility fractures as another diabetes complication and discuss more deeply about the requirement for adequate screening and preventive measures. This review aims to briefly explore the impact of T2DM on bone metabolic and mechanical proprieties and fracture risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

          Although patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at significant risk for well-recognized diabetic complications, including macrovascular disease, retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy, it is also clear that T2D patients are at increased risk for fragility fractures. Furthermore, fragility fractures in patients with T2D occur at higher bone mineral density (BMD) values compared to nondiabetic controls, suggesting abnormalities in bone material strength (BMS) and/or bone microarchitecture (bone "quality"). Thus, we performed in vivo microindentation testing of the tibia to directly measure BMS in 60 postmenopausal women (age range, 50-80 years) including 30 patients diagnosed with T2D for >10 years and 30 age-matched, nondiabetic controls. Regional BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture was assessed from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) images of the distal radius and tibia. Compared to controls, T2D patients had significantly lower BMS: unadjusted (-11.7%; p<0.001); following adjustment for body mass index (BMI) (-10.5%; p<0.001); and following additional adjustment for age, hypertension, nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, and vascular disease (-9.2%; p=0.022). By contrast, after adjustment for confounding by BMI, T2D patients had bone microarchitecture and BMD that were not significantly different than controls; however, radial cortical porosity tended to be higher in the T2D patients. In addition, patients with T2D had significantly reduced serum markers of bone turnover (all p<0.001) compared to controls. Of note, in patients with T2D, the average glycated hemoglobin level over the previous 10 years was negatively correlated with BMS (r=-0.41; p=0.026). In conclusion, these findings represent the first demonstration of compromised BMS in patients with T2D. Furthermore, our results confirm previous studies demonstrating low bone turnover in patients with T2D and highlight the potential detrimental effects of prolonged hyperglycemia on bone quality. Thus, the skeleton needs to be recognized as another important target tissue subject to diabetic complications. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bone mineral density and fracture risk in type-2 diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study.

            The aim of this study was to determine the association between type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM), BMD and fractures in 6,655 men and women aged 55 years and over from the Rotterdam Study. We compared subjects with type-2 DM to subjects without DM. Additionally, subset analyses were performed, dividing subjects on the basis of the glucose tolerance test into already treated DM, newly diagnosed DM, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT, reference). Femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD were measured using DEXA. Nonvertebral fracture ascertainment was performed using an automated record system involving GPs and local hospitals. Although subjects with DM had higher BMD, they had an increased nonvertebral fracture risk: hazard ratio (HR) 1.33 (1.00-1.77). In subset analysis, the increased fracture risk appeared restricted to treated DM subjects only: HR 1.69 (1.16-2.46). Subjects with IGT had a higher BMD, but contrary to treated DM, they had a lower fracture risk: HR 0.80 (0.63-1.00). In conclusion, subjects with type-2 DM and IGT both have a higher BMD. Whereas, subjects with IGT have a decreased fracture risk, subjects with DM (primarily those with already established and treated DM) had an increased fracture risk, probably due to long-term complications associated with DM.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of gut hormones in glucose homeostasis.

              The gastrointestinal tract has a crucial role in the control of energy homeostasis through its role in the digestion, absorption, and assimilation of ingested nutrients. Furthermore, signals from the gastrointestinal tract are important regulators of gut motility and satiety, both of which have implications for the long-term control of body weight. Among the specialized cell types in the gastrointestinal mucosa, enteroendocrine cells have important roles in regulating energy intake and glucose homeostasis through their actions on peripheral target organs, including the endocrine pancreas. This article reviews the biological actions of gut hormones regulating glucose homeostasis, with an emphasis on mechanisms of action and the emerging therapeutic roles of gut hormones for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                + 55 41 3023 12 52 , claudiapsanches@hotmail.com , adm@centrodediabetescuritiba.com.br
                drandrevianna@gmail.com , adm@centrodediabetescuritiba.com.br , ppgcs@pucpr.br
                fellype_barreto@hotmail.com
                Journal
                Diabetol Metab Syndr
                Diabetol Metab Syndr
                Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
                BioMed Central (London )
                1758-5996
                19 October 2017
                19 October 2017
                2017
                : 9
                : 85
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4670 1072, GRID grid.414901.9, Curitiba Diabetes Center, Division of Endocrinology, , Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, ; Rua Alcides Munhoz, 433, 4° andar, Mercês, Curitiba, Paraná ZIP Code: 80810-040 Brazil
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8601 0541, GRID grid.412522.2, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, ; Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155 , Bloco Medicina, Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná ZIP Code: 80215-901 Brazil
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1941 472X, GRID grid.20736.30, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, , Federal University of Paraná, ; Rua General Carneiro 181, Alto da Gloria, Curitiba, Paraná ZIP Code: 80060-900 Brazil
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-3543
                Article
                278
                10.1186/s13098-017-0278-1
                5649056
                29075333
                3c158e03-66de-45fd-bc60-b852c13945c6
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 1 July 2017
                : 3 October 2017
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                type 2 diabetes,bone metabolism,bone mineral density,fracture
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                type 2 diabetes, bone metabolism, bone mineral density, fracture

                Comments

                Comment on this article