4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Are patterns of sampling effort and completeness of inventories congruent? A test using databases for five insect taxa in the Iberian Peninsula

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          • Evaluating data quality and inventory completeness must be a preliminary step in any biodiversity research, particularly in the case of insects and high biodiversity areas. Yet, this step is often neglected or, at best, assessed only for one insect group, and the degree of congruence of sampling effort ffor different insect groups remains unexplored.

          • We assess the congruence in the spatial distribution of sampling effort for five insect groups (butterflies, caddisflies, dung beetles, moths, and aquatic beetles) in the Iberian Peninsula. We identify well‐surveyed areas for each taxonomic group and examine the degree to which the patterns of sampling effort can be explained by a set of variables related to environmental conditions and accessibility.

          • Irrespective of the general lack of reliable inventories, we found a general but low congruence in the completeness patterns of the different taxa. This suggests that there is not a common geographical pattern in survey effort and that idiosyncratic and contingent factors (mainly the proximity to the workplaces of entomologists) are differentially affecting each group.

          • After many decades of taxonomic and faunistic work, distributional databases of Iberian insects are still in a very preliminary stage, thus limiting our capacity to obtain reliable answers to basic and applied questions.

          • We recommend carrying out long‐term, standardised and well‐designed entomological surveys able to generate a reliable image of the distribution of different insect groups. This will allow us to estimate accurately insect trends and better understand the full extent of global biodiversity loss.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

            Conservationists are far from able to assist all species under threat, if only for lack of funding. This places a premium on priorities: how can we support the most species at the least cost? One way is to identify 'biodiversity hotspots' where exceptional concentrations of endemic species are undergoing exceptional loss of habitat. As many as 44% of all species of vascular plants and 35% of all species in four vertebrate groups are confined to 25 hotspots comprising only 1.4% of the land surface of the Earth. This opens the way for a 'silver bullet' strategy on the part of conservation planners, focusing on these hotspots in proportion to their share of the world's species at risk.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas

              Global declines in insects have sparked wide interest among scientists, politicians, and the general public. Loss of insect diversity and abundance is expected to provoke cascading effects on food webs and to jeopardize ecosystem services. Our understanding of the extent and underlying causes of this decline is based on the abundance of single species or taxonomic groups only, rather than changes in insect biomass which is more relevant for ecological functioning. Here, we used a standardized protocol to measure total insect biomass using Malaise traps, deployed over 27 years in 63 nature protection areas in Germany (96 unique location-year combinations) to infer on the status and trend of local entomofauna. Our analysis estimates a seasonal decline of 76%, and mid-summer decline of 82% in flying insect biomass over the 27 years of study. We show that this decline is apparent regardless of habitat type, while changes in weather, land use, and habitat characteristics cannot explain this overall decline. This yet unrecognized loss of insect biomass must be taken into account in evaluating declines in abundance of species depending on insects as a food source, and ecosystem functioning in the European landscape.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Insect Conservation and Diversity
                Insect Conserv Diversity
                Wiley
                1752-458X
                1752-4598
                July 2022
                January 17 2022
                July 2022
                : 15
                : 4
                : 406-415
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología Universidad de Murcia Murcia Spain
                [2 ] DITEG Research Group Facultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla‐La Mancha Toledo Spain
                [3 ] Freshwater Ecology, Hydrology and Management group (FEHM), Departamento de Biologia Evolutiva Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
                [4 ] Departamento de Biología y Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC‐UAM) Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain
                [5 ] Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Vigo Vigo Spain
                [6 ] Department of Computer Science Universidad de Vigo Vigo Spain
                [7 ] Departamento de Zoología Universidad de Granada Granada Spain
                [8 ] Departamento de Biogeografía y Cambio Global Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales CSIC, Madrid Spain
                Article
                10.1111/icad.12566
                3bfb8bf3-80c2-42fe-99b5-03e5584a5f53
                © 2022

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article