21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recycling nutrients contained in human excreta to agriculture: Pathways, processes, and products

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references291

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review.

          In this article, the technical feasibility of various low-cost adsorbents for heavy metal removal from contaminated water has been reviewed. Instead of using commercial activated carbon, researchers have worked on inexpensive materials, such as chitosan, zeolites, and other adsorbents, which have high adsorption capacity and are locally available. The results of their removal performance are compared to that of activated carbon and are presented in this study. It is evident from our literature survey of about 100 papers that low-cost adsorbents have demonstrated outstanding removal capabilities for certain metal ions as compared to activated carbon. Adsorbents that stand out for high adsorption capacities are chitosan (815, 273, 250 mg/g of Hg(2+), Cr(6+), and Cd(2+), respectively), zeolites (175 and 137 mg/g of Pb(2+) and Cd(2+), respectively), waste slurry (1030, 560, 540 mg/g of Pb(2+), Hg(2+), and Cr(6+), respectively), and lignin (1865 mg/g of Pb(2+)). These adsorbents are suitable for inorganic effluent treatment containing the metal ions mentioned previously. It is important to note that the adsorption capacities of the adsorbents presented in this paper vary, depending on the characteristics of the individual adsorbent, the extent of chemical modifications, and the concentration of adsorbate.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology

            The safe disposal of human excreta is of paramount importance for the health and welfare of populations living in low income countries as well as the prevention of pollution to the surrounding environment. On-site sanitation (OSS) systems are the most numerous means of treating excreta in low income countries, these facilities aim at treating human waste at source and can provide a hygienic and affordable method of waste disposal. However, current OSS systems need improvement and require further research and development. Development of OSS facilities that treat excreta at, or close to, its source require knowledge of the waste stream entering the system. Data regarding the generation rate and the chemical and physical composition of fresh feces and urine was collected from the medical literature as well as the treatability sector. The data were summarized and statistical analysis was used to quantify the major factors that were a significant cause of variability. The impact of this data on biological processes, thermal processes, physical separators, and chemical processes was then assessed. Results showed that the median fecal wet mass production was 128 g/cap/day, with a median dry mass of 29 g/cap/day. Fecal output in healthy individuals was 1.20 defecations per 24 hr period and the main factor affecting fecal mass was the fiber intake of the population. Fecal wet mass values were increased by a factor of 2 in low income countries (high fiber intakes) in comparison to values found in high income countries (low fiber intakes). Feces had a median pH of 6.64 and were composed of 74.6% water. Bacterial biomass is the major component (25–54% of dry solids) of the organic fraction of the feces. Undigested carbohydrate, fiber, protein, and fat comprise the remainder and the amounts depend on diet and diarrhea prevalence in the population. The inorganic component of the feces is primarily undigested dietary elements that also depend on dietary supply. Median urine generation rates were 1.42 L/cap/day with a dry solids content of 59 g/cap/day. Variation in the volume and composition of urine is caused by differences in physical exertion, environmental conditions, as well as water, salt, and high protein intakes. Urine has a pH 6.2 and contains the largest fractions of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium released from the body. The urinary excretion of nitrogen was significant (10.98 g/cap/day) with urea the most predominant constituent making up over 50% of total organic solids. The dietary intake of food and fluid is the major cause of variation in both the fecal and urine composition and these variables should always be considered if the generation rate, physical, and chemical composition of feces and urine is to be accurately predicted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An overview of the chemical composition of biomass

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
                Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
                Informa UK Limited
                1064-3389
                1547-6537
                January 29 2019
                April 18 2019
                January 29 2019
                April 18 2019
                : 49
                : 8
                : 695-743
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Environmental Systems Analysis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden;
                [2 ] Sustainable Agricultural Landscapes Laboratory, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
                [3 ] Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability (IRES), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
                [4 ] Sub-department of Environmental Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands;
                [5 ] Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf, Switzerland
                Article
                10.1080/10643389.2018.1558889
                3bfb4bb0-e109-4e60-a13c-3b6ce8de9a46
                © 2019

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article