290
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations: Negative Findings From a Double-Blind-Randomized Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background.

          Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) in schizophrenia are resistant to antipsychotic medication in approximately 25% of patients. Treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for refractory AVH has shown varying results. A stimulation protocol using continuous theta burst rTMS (TB-rTMS) showed high efficacy in open label studies. We tested TB-rTMS as a treatment strategy for refractory AVH in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

          Methods.

          Seventy-one patients with AVH were randomly allocated to TB-rTMS or placebo treatment. They received 10 TB-rTMS or sham treatments over the left temporoparietal cortex in consecutive days. AVH severity was assessed at baseline, end of treatment and follow-up using the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS) and the Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS). Other schizophrenia-related symptoms were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

          Results.

          Seven patients dropped out before completing the study. In the remaining 64, AVH improved significantly after treatment in both groups as measured with both PSYRATS and AHRS. PANSS positive and general subscores also decreased, but the negative subscores did not. However, improvement did not differ significantly between the TB-rTMS and the placebo group on any outcome measure.

          Conclusions.

          Symptom reduction could be achieved in patients with medication-resistant hallucinations, even within 1 week time. However, as both groups showed similar improvement, effects were general (ie, placebo-effects) rather than specific to treatment with continuous TB-rTMS. Our findings highlight the importance of double-blind trials including a sham-control condition to assess efficacy of new treatments such as TMS.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Schizophr Bull
          Schizophr Bull
          schbul
          schbul
          Schizophrenia Bulletin
          Oxford University Press (US )
          0586-7614
          1745-1701
          January 2016
          28 July 2015
          : 42
          : 1
          : 250-257
          Affiliations
          1 Psychiatry Department, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht, The Netherlands;
          2 Brain Center Rudolf Magnus , Utrecht, The Netherlands
          Author notes
          *To whom correspondence should be addressed; University Medical Center Utrecht, Postbus 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; tel: 0031-88-7558672, fax: 0031-88-7555487, e-mail: s.koops@ 123456umcutrecht.nl
          Article
          PMC4681555 PMC4681555 4681555
          10.1093/schbul/sbv100
          4681555
          26221051
          3ba1df95-65c4-419b-9c43-b9293dce4288
          © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
          History
          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Categories
          Regular Article

          RCT,voices,focal stimulation,psychotic disorder,TMS
          RCT, voices, focal stimulation, psychotic disorder, TMS

          Comments

          Comment on this article