10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Women’s psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Given the sudden and unexpected nature of an emergency caesarean section (EmCS) coupled with an increased risk of psychological distress, it is particularly important to understand the psychosocial outcomes for women. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify, collate and examine the evidence surrounding women’s psychosocial outcomes of EmCS worldwide.

          Methods

          The electronic databases of EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched between November 2017 and March 2018. To ensure articles were reflective of original and recently published research, the search criteria included peer-reviewed research articles published within the last 20 years (1998 to 2018). All study designs were included if they incorporated an examination of women’s psychosocial outcomes after EmCS. Due to inherent heterogeneity of study data, extraction and synthesis of both qualitative and quantitative data pertaining to key psychosocial outcomes were organised into coherent themes and analysis was attempted.

          Results

          In total 17,189 articles were identified. Of these, 208 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. One hundred forty-nine articles were further excluded, resulting in the inclusion of 66 articles in the current systematic literature review. While meta-analyses were not possible due to the nature of the heterogeneity, key psychosocial outcomes identified that were negatively impacted by EmCS included post-traumatic stress, health-related quality of life, experiences, infant-feeding, satisfaction, and self-esteem. Post-traumatic stress was one of the most commonly examined psychosocial outcomes, with a strong consensus that EmCS contributes to both symptoms and diagnosis.

          Conclusions

          EmCS was found to negatively impact several psychosocial outcomes for women in particular post-traumatic stress. While investment in technologies and clinical practice to minimise the number of EmCSs is crucial, further investigations are needed to develop effective strategies to prepare and support women who experience this type of birth.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

          The striking increase in caesarean section rates in middle- and high-income countries has been partly attributed to maternal request. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of women's preferences for caesarean section. To review the published literature on women's preferences for caesarean section. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and PsychINFO was performed. References of all included articles were examined. We included studies that quantitatively evaluated women's preferences for caesarean section in any country. We excluded articles assessing health providers' preferences and qualitative studies. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts of all identified citations, selected potentially eligible studies, and assessed their full-text versions. We conducted a meta-analysis of proportions, and a meta-regression analysis to determine variables significantly associated with caesarean section preference. Thirty-eight studies were included (n = 19,403). The overall pooled preference for caesarean section was 15.6% (95% CI 12.5-18.9). Higher preference for caesarean section was reported in women with a previous caesarean section versus women without a previous caesarean section (29.4%; 95% CI 24.4-34.8 versus 10.1%; 95% CI 7.5-13.1), and those living in a middle-income country versus a high-income country (22.1%; 95% CI 17.6-26.9 versus 11.8%; 95% CI 8.9-15.1). Only a minority of women in a wide variety of countries expressed a preference for caesarean delivery. Further research is needed to better estimate the contribution of women's demand to the rising caesarean section rates. © 2010 The Authors Journal compilation © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth.

            This study aimed to assess the relation between fear of childbirth and previous birth experiences. A prospective study of pregnant women. Akershus University Hospital, Norway. Parous women (n = 1357) scheduled to give birth at Akershus University Hospital in Norway during 2009-2011. Data were collected using two self-completed questionnaires at pregnancy weeks 17 and 32. Fear of childbirth was assessed by the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire. Previous overall birth experience was measured using a numeric rating scale, and previous obstetric complications were assessed using an index of seven obstetric complications: emergency cesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery, extensive blood loss, retained placenta, serious maternal infection during labor, thrombosis, and anal sphincter tears. Fear of childbirth. The odds ratio of fear of childbirth was 4.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-8.3) for a previous negative overall birth experience, 1.9 (95% CI 1.2-3.1) for one obstetric complication and 2.6 (95% CI 1.2-5.5) for two or more complications. The estimates were adjusted for mental health, labor pain, time since last delivery, age, and education. Almost 80% of women who experienced obstetric complications neither considered the birth a negative overall experience nor developed a fear of childbirth. The association between a previous subjectively negative birth experience and fear of childbirth was high and was greater than the association between previous obstetric complications and fear of childbirth. © 2012 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica © 2012 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Women's expectations and experiences of childbirth.

              to explore, describe and understand the expectations during pregnancy and subsequent experiences of childbirth in primiparae. a qualitative study using a phenomenological approach. Data were collected using unstructured, tape-recorded interviews in late pregnancy and at two weeks post birth. the north of England. eight pregnant women, expecting their first baby. the women all wanted to take an active part in their labour and the feeling of being 'in control' was the main finding and the 'essence' of this study. This was achieved through support from partners, the positive attitudes of the midwives caring for them during pregnancy and labour, information giving during pregnancy and labour and being able to make and be included in decision making during labour. if women are to be empowered by making choices for childbirth and feeling 'in control', then it is important for midwives to explore and discover the wishes and feelings of women in their care so that realistic expectations can be promoted and then hopefully fulfilled. Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                madeleine.benton@adelaide.edu.au
                amy.salter@adelaide.edu.au
                nicole.tape@adelaide.edu.au
                chris.wilkinson@sa.gov.au
                deborah.turnbull@adelaide.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                30 December 2019
                30 December 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 535
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7304, GRID grid.1010.0, School of Psychology, , University of Adelaide, ; Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7304, GRID grid.1010.0, School of Public Health, , University of Adelaide, ; Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1694.a, Maternal Fetal Medicine, , Women’s and Children’s Hospital, ; Adelaide, South Australia Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-6334
                Article
                2687
                10.1186/s12884-019-2687-7
                6937939
                31888530
                3b892b87-ed8f-46d1-984d-c884d51226ec
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 May 2019
                : 17 December 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                systematic literature review,childbirth,emergency caesarean section,psychosocial outcomes,maternal health,postpartum

                Comments

                Comment on this article