1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: a review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) occurs due to anatomic blockage of the stomach or duodenum. GOO typically manifests with symptoms such as early satiety, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss, due to either underlying benign or malignant causes. Historically, the gold standard for managing GOO has been surgical gastrojejunostomy. However, this approach comes with considerable drawbacks including prolonged recovery times and the necessity for suitable surgical candidates. Endoscopically placed self-expanding metal stents emerged as a notable advancement in palliating symptoms associated with GOO. However, their long-term efficacy is hindered by the frequent occurrence of stent occlusion, necessitating the need for further intervention. Most recently, endoscopic ultrasound guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen-apposing metal stents has been described with promising technical and clinical success rates. The advent of EUS-GE heralds a significant stride forward in the management of GOO, offering a less invasive yet effective alternative to conventional surgical approaches. EUS-GE has been associated with lower adverse events as compared with surgical gastrojejunostomy and lower recurrence and reintervention rates compared with enteral stenting. The advent of EUS-GE heralds a significant stride forward in the management of GOO, offering a less invasive yet effective alternative to conventional surgical approaches. EUS-GE is a promising evolving technique for treating GOO, and ongoing studies are necessary to validate its use in both benign and malignant GOO.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial.

          Both gastrojejunostomy (GJJ) and stent placement are commonly used palliative treatments of obstructive symptoms caused by malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Compare GJJ and stent placement. Multicenter, randomized trial. Twenty-one centers in The Netherlands. Patients with GOO. GJJ and stent placement. Outcomes were medical effects, quality of life, and costs. Analysis was by intent to treat. Eighteen patients were randomized to GJJ and 21 to stent placement. Food intake improved more rapidly after stent placement than after GJJ (GOO Scoring System score > or = 2: median 5 vs 8 days, respectively; P < .01) but long-term relief was better after GJJ, with more patients living more days with a GOO Scoring System score of 2 or more than after stent placement (72 vs 50 days, respectively; P = .05). More major complications (stent: 6 in 4 patients vs GJJ: 0; P = .02), recurrent obstructive symptoms (stent: 8 in 5 patients vs GJJ: 1 in 1 patient; P = .02), and reinterventions (stent: 10 in 7 patients vs GJJ: 2 in 2 patients; P < .01) were observed after stent placement compared with GJJ. When stent obstruction was not regarded as a major complication, no differences in complications were found (P = .4). There were also no differences in median survival (stent: 56 days vs GJJ: 78 days) and quality of life. Mean total costs of GJJ were higher compared with stent placement ($16,535 vs $11,720, respectively; P = .049 [comparing medians]). Because of the small study population, only initial hospital costs would have been statistically significant if the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing had been applied. Relatively small patient population. Despite slow initial symptom improvement, GJJ was associated with better long-term results and is therefore the treatment of choice in patients with a life expectancy of 2 months or longer. Because stent placement was associated with better short-term outcomes, this treatment is preferable for patients expected to live less than 2 months. ( ISRCTN 06702358.). 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy versus Enteral Stent Placement for Palliation of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

            EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel procedure for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), however data comparing EUS-GE to enteral stent placement is limited. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between EUS-GE and enteral stent placement in the palliation of malignant GOO. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database on patients who underwent EUS-GE or enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant GOO from 2014–2017. Primary outcome was the rate of stent failure requiring repeat intervention. Secondary outcomes included technical and clinical success, time to repeat intervention, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. A total of 100 consecutive patients (mean age 65.9±11.9 years, 44.0% female) were identified, of which 78 underwent enteral stent placement, and 22 underwent EUS-GE. Rate of stent failure requiring repeat intervention was higher in the enteral stent group than the EUS-GE group (32.0% vs 8.3%, p =0.021). Technical success was achieved in 100% in both groups. Higher initial clinical success was attained in the EUS-GE group than the enteral stent group (95.8% vs 76.3%, p =0.042). Mean length of hospital stay following stent placement was similar between groups ( p =0.821). The enteral stent group trended towards increased adverse events (40.2% vs 20.8%, p =0.098). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed decreased stent function in the enteral stent group ( p =0.013). Compared to enteral stent placement, EUS-GE has a higher rate of initial clinical success and lower rate of stent failure requiring repeat intervention. EUS-GE may be offered for selected patients with malignant GOO in centers with extensive experience.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              EUS-guided Gastrojejunostomy Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy: An International Collaborative Study.

              Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) with placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent is a minimally invasive and efficacious procedure for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) patients not amenable to surgery. Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (Lap-GJ) has traditionally been the standard of care. No direct comparison between EUS-GJ and Lap-GJ has been described. Our aim was to compare the clinical outcomes, success rate, and adverse events (AE) of EUS-GJ with Lap-GJ.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol
                TGH
                Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                AME Publishing Company
                2415-1289
                17 January 2025
                2025
                : 10
                : 13
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, NYU Langone Long Island Hospital, Mineola , NY, USA,
                Author notes

                Contributions: (I) Conception and design: J Widmer; (II) Administrative support: J Widmer; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Both authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Both authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Both authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: Both authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: Both authors.

                Correspondence to: Jessica Widmer, DO, FASGE. Chief, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, NYU Langone Long Island Hospital, 259 1 st St, Mineola, NY 11501, USA. Email: Jessica.widmer@ 123456nyulangone.org .
                Article
                tgh-10-23-51
                10.21037/tgh-23-51
                11811553
                3b048888-4f79-4a7e-9459-b54ff8fd3ce0
                Copyright © 2025 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 20 July 2023
                : 23 September 2024
                Categories
                Review Article

                endoscopic ultrasound guided gastroenterostomy (eus-ge),endoscopic ultrasound guided gastrojejunostomy,endoscopic ultrasound (eus)

                Comments

                Comment on this article