9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Conspiracy theories are part of mainstream public life, with the potential to undermine governments, promote racism, ignite extremism and threaten public health efforts. Psychological research on conspiracy theories is booming, with more than half of the academic articles on the topic published since 2019. In this Review, we synthesize the literature with an eye to understanding the psychological factors that shape willingness to believe conspiracy theories. We begin at the individual level, examining the cognitive, clinical, motivational, personality and developmental factors that predispose people to believe conspiracy theories. Drawing on insights from social and evolutionary psychology, we then review research examining conspiracy theories as an intergroup phenomenon that reflects and reinforces societal fault lines. Finally, we examine how conspiracy theories are shaped by the economic, political, cultural and socio-historical contexts at the national level. This multilevel approach offers a deep and broad insight into conspiracist thinking that increases understanding of the problem and offers potential solutions.

          Abstract

          Conspiracy theories have the potential to undermine governments, promote racism, ignite extremism and threaten public health efforts. In this Review, Hornsey et al. synthesize the literature on factors that shape conspiracy beliefs at the individual, intergroup and national level.

          Related collections

          Most cited references195

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

            A hypothesized need to form and maintain strong, stable interpersonal relationships is evaluated in light of the empirical literature. The need is for frequent, nonaversive interactions within an ongoing relational bond. Consistent with the belongingness hypothesis, people form social attachments readily under most conditions and resist the dissolution of existing bonds. Belongingness appears to have multiple and strong effects on emotional patterns and on cognitive processes. Lack of attachments is linked to a variety of ill effects on health, adjustment, and well-being. Other evidence, such as that concerning satiation, substitution, and behavioral consequences, is likewise consistent with the hypothesized motivation. Several seeming counterexamples turned out not to disconfirm the hypothesis. Existing evidence supports the hypothesis that the need to belong is a powerful, fundamental, and extremely pervasive motivation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions

              The current studies investigated the potential impact of anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs, and exposure to anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, on vaccination intentions. In Study 1, British parents completed a questionnaire measuring beliefs in anti-vaccine conspiracy theories and the likelihood that they would have a fictitious child vaccinated. Results revealed a significant negative relationship between anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs and vaccination intentions. This effect was mediated by the perceived dangers of vaccines, and feelings of powerlessness, disillusionment and mistrust in authorities. In Study 2, participants were exposed to information that either supported or refuted anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, or a control condition. Results revealed that participants who had been exposed to material supporting anti-vaccine conspiracy theories showed less intention to vaccinate than those in the anti-conspiracy condition or controls. This effect was mediated by the same variables as in Study 1. These findings point to the potentially detrimental consequences of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, and highlight their potential role in shaping health-related behaviors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                m.hornsey@uq.edu.au
                Journal
                Nat Rev Psychol
                Nat Rev Psychol
                Nature Reviews Psychology
                Nature Publishing Group US (New York )
                2731-0574
                22 November 2022
                : 1-13
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, Business School, , University of Queensland, ; Brisbane, Queensland Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.5510.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, Department of Psychology, , University of Oslo, ; Oslo, Norway
                [3 ]GRID grid.418956.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0493 3318, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, ; Tübingen, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.10392.39, ISNI 0000 0001 2190 1447, Department of Psychology, , University of Tübingen School of Science, ; Tübingen, Germany
                [5 ]GRID grid.9759.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2232 2818, School of Psychology, , University of Kent, ; Canterbury, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1275-3977
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-5633
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6579-8250
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6924
                Article
                133
                10.1038/s44159-022-00133-0
                9685076
                36467717
                3a7cb3b9-f477-40a3-8938-b512befb3f78
                © Springer Nature America, Inc. 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 25 October 2022
                Categories
                Review Article

                human behaviour,psychology
                human behaviour, psychology

                Comments

                Comment on this article