For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
3
views
48
references
 Top references
cited by
6
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      3,201
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      “God put weed here for us to smoke”: A mixed-methods study of religion and spirituality among adolescents with cannabis use disorders

      Author(s): 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3
      Publication date Created:
      Publication date (Electronic):
      Journal: Substance Abuse
      Publisher: Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A growing literature on adults with substance use disorders (SUDs) suggests that religious and spiritual processes can support recovery, such that higher levels of religiosity and/or spirituality predict better substance use outcomes. However, studies of the role of religion and spirituality in adolescent SUD treatment response have produced mixed findings, and religiosity and spirituality have rarely been examined separately.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Theorizing Religious Effects Among American Adolescents

          Christian Smith (2003)
          Article 0 comments Cited 99 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validity of Timeline Follow-Back for self-reported use of cannabis and other illicit substances--systematic review and meta-analysis.

            Carsten Rygaard Hjorthøj, Anne Hjorthøj, Merete Nordentoft (2012)
            Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) is a widely used, calendar-based measure of self-reported use of (among other things) illicit substances. We examined agreement between TLFB and biological measures for illicit substances. PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched in December 2010. 16,633 papers screened to identify those that measured illicit substance use by both TLFB and biological measures. We extracted data on agreement between TLFB and biological measures, sample size, study type, inclusion criteria of participants, and length of recall of TLFB. Twenty-nine papers were included, almost exclusively in substance-use-disorder populations. Some studies reported several overall agreement rates, e.g. over time. Lowest and highest weighted average agreement rates were: for cannabis, 87.3% (95% confidence interval 86.9% to 87.7%) and 90.9% (90.5% to 91.4%); for cocaine, 79.3% (79.1% to 79.6%) and 84.1% (83.9% to 84.2%); for opiates 94.0% (93.5% to 94.5%) for both weighted averages; and for studies not distinguishing between substances, 88.5% (88.4 to 88.7%) and 91.0% (90.7% to 91.2%). Higher agreement was found in populations without psychiatric comorbidity, and lower agreement in randomized controlled trials. Publication bias or selective outcome reporting bias was not detected. TLFB validly detects use of illicit substances in populations with substance use disorders. Using TLFB may limit the need for biological samples, making information on illicit substance use easier and less costly to obtain and analyze. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Article 0 comments Cited 76 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Role of Social Supports, Spirituality, Religiousness, Life Meaning and Affiliation with 12-Step Fellowships in Quality of Life Satisfaction Among Individuals in Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems.

              Alexandre B Laudet, Keith Morgen, William L White (2006)
              Many recovering substance users report quitting drugs because they wanted a better life. The road of recovery is the path to a better life but a challenging and stressful path for most. There has been little research among recovering persons in spite of the numbers involved, and most research has focused on substance use outcomes. This study examines stress and quality of life as a function of time in recovery, and uses structural equation modeling to test the hypothesis that social supports, spirituality, religiousness, life meaning, and 12-step affiliation buffer stress toward enhanced life satisfaction. Recovering persons (N = 353) recruited in New York City were mostly inner-city ethnic minority members whose primary substance had been crack or heroin. Longer recovery time was significantly associated with lower stress and with higher quality of life. Findings supported the study hypothesis; the 'buffer' constructs accounted for 22% of the variance in life satisfaction. Implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.
              Article 0 comments Cited 65 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: Substance Abuse
                Abbreviated Title: Substance Abuse
                Publisher: Informa UK Limited
                ISSN (Print): 0889-7077
                ISSN (Electronic): 1547-0164
                Publication date Created: March 22 2019
                Publication date Created: October 02 2018
                Publication date (Electronic): October 08 2018
                Publication date (Print): October 02 2018
                Volume: 39
                Issue: 4
                Pages: 484-492
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
                [2 ] Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
                [3 ] Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                Article
                DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1449168
                PMC ID: 6430642
                PubMed ID: 29558286
                SO-VID: 3a44c155-96ea-4abe-8ae4-0f132b210bc0
                Copyright © © 2018
                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content3,201

                See all similar

                Cited by6

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors415

                See all reference authors