35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for the pretreatment prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on breast DCE-MRI

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In this study, we evaluated the ability of radiomic textural analysis of intratumoral and peritumoral regions on pretreatment breast cancer dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to predict pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

          Methods

          A total of 117 patients who had received NAC were retrospectively analyzed. Within the intratumoral and peritumoral regions of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI scans, a total of 99 radiomic textural features were computed at multiple phases. Feature selection was used to identify a set of top pCR-associated features from within a training set ( n = 78), which were then used to train multiple machine learning classifiers to predict the likelihood of pCR for a given patient. Classifiers were then independently tested on 39 patients. Experiments were repeated separately among hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR +, HER2 ) and triple-negative or HER2 + (TN/HER2 +) tumors via threefold cross-validation to determine whether receptor status-specific analysis could improve classification performance.

          Results

          Among all patients, a combined intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic feature set yielded a maximum AUC of 0.78 ± 0.030 within the training set and 0.74 within the independent testing set using a diagonal linear discriminant analysis (DLDA) classifier. Receptor status-specific feature discovery and classification enabled improved prediction of pCR, yielding maximum AUCs of 0.83 ± 0.025 within the HR +, HER2 group using DLDA and 0.93 ± 0.018 within the TN/HER2 + group using a naive Bayes classifier. In HR +, HER2 breast cancers, non-pCR was characterized by elevated peritumoral heterogeneity during initial contrast enhancement. However, TN/HER2 + tumors were best characterized by a speckled enhancement pattern within the peritumoral region of nonresponders. Radiomic features were found to strongly predict pCR independent of choice of classifier, suggesting their robustness as response predictors.

          Conclusions

          Through a combined intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics approach, we could successfully predict pCR to NAC from pretreatment breast DCE-MRI, both with and without a priori knowledge of receptor status. Further, our findings suggest that the radiomic features most predictive of response vary across different receptor subtypes.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0846-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          MINIMUM REDUNDANCY FEATURE SELECTION FROM MICROARRAY GENE EXPRESSION DATA

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

            P S Tofts (2015)
            Three major models (from Tofts, Larsson, and Brix) for collecting and analyzing dynamic MRI gadolinium-diethylene-triamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) data are examined. All models use compartments representing the blood plasma and the abnormal extravascular extracellular space (EES), and they are intercompatible. All measure combinations of three parameters; (1) kPSp is the influx volume transfer constant (min-1), or permeability surface area product per unit volume of tissue, between plasma and EES; (2) ve is the volume of EES space per unit volume of tissue (0 < ve < 1); and (3) K(ep), the efflux rate constant (min-1), is the ratio of the first two parameters (k(ep) = kPSp/ve). The ratio K(ep) is the simplest to measure, requiring only signal linearity with Gd tracer concentration or, alternatively, a measurement of T1 before injection of Gd (T10). To measure the physiologic parameters kPSp and ve separately requires knowledge of T10 and of the tissue relaxivity R1 (approximately in vitro value).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

              Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a surrogate end-point for prognosis in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. We aimed to report summary estimates of the proportion of subjects achieving pCR (pCR%) by tumour subtype, and to determine whether subtype was independently associated with pCR, in a study-level meta-analysis. We systematically identified NAC studies reporting pCR data according to tumour subtype, using predefined eligibility criteria. Descriptive, qualitative and quantitative data were extracted. Random effects logistic meta-regression examined whether pCR% was associated with subtype, defined using three categories for model 1 [hormone receptor positive (HR+/HER2-), HER2 positive (HER2+), triple negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-)] and 4 categories for model 2 [HER2+ further classified as HER2+/HR+ and HER2+/HR-]. Subtype-specific odds ratios (OR) were calculated and were adjusted for covariates associated with pCR in our data. In model 1, based on 11,695 subjects from 30 eligible studies, overall pooled pCR% was 18.9% (16.6-21.5%), and in model 2 (20 studies, 8095 subjects) pooled pCR% was 18.5% (16.2-21.1%); tumour subtype was associated with pCR% (P<0.0001) in both models. Subtype-specific pCR% (model 2) was: 8.3% (6.7-10.2%) in HR+/HER2- [OR 1/referent], 18.7% (15.0-23.1%) in HER2+/HR+ [OR 2.6], 38.9% (33.2-44.9%) in HER2+/HR- [OR 7.1] and 31.1% (26.5-36.1%) in triple negative [OR 5.0]; pCR% was significantly higher for the HER2+/HR- compared with the triple negative subtype, however pCR% was very similar for these subtypes (and OR=5.0 both subtypes) when studies using HER2-directed therapy with NAC were excluded from the model. Neither sensitivity analysis (excluding unknown subtypes), nor adjustment for associated covariates, substantially altered our findings. This meta-analysis provides evidence of an independent association between breast cancer subtype and pCR; odds of pCR were highest for the triple negative and HER2+/HR- subtypes, with evidence of an influential effect on achieving pCR in the latter subtype through inclusion of HER2-directed therapy with NAC. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nathaniel.braman@case.edu
                maryam.etesami@yale.edu
                pxp238@case.edu
                christina.dubchuk@uhhospitals.org
                hannah.gilmore@uhhospitals.org
                pxt130@case.edu
                donna.plecha@uhhospitals.org
                axm788@case.edu
                Journal
                Breast Cancer Res
                Breast Cancer Res
                Breast Cancer Research : BCR
                BioMed Central (London )
                1465-5411
                1465-542X
                18 May 2017
                18 May 2017
                2017
                : 19
                : 57
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2164 3847, GRID grid.67105.35, Department of Biomedical Engineering, , Case Western Reserve University, ; Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9149 4843, GRID grid.443867.a, , University Hospitals Case Medical Center, ; Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
                Article
                846
                10.1186/s13058-017-0846-1
                5437672
                28521821
                3a2a8117-0c96-401a-a804-e5cf53ea81de
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 29 December 2016
                : 25 April 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: R21CA179327-01
                Award ID: R21CA195152-01
                Award ID: U24CA199374-01
                Award ID: R01CA202752-01A1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000062, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases;
                Award ID: R01DK098503-02
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000070, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering;
                Award ID: T32EB007509
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000005, U.S. Department of Defense;
                Award ID: PC120857
                Award ID: LC130463
                Award ID: W81XWH-16-1-0329
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008533, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007311, Cleveland Clinic;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001062, Wallace H. Coulter Foundation;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008564, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008533, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008565, Case School of Engineering, Case Western Reserve University;
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute (US)
                Award ID: R01CA208236-01A1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000097, National Center for Research Resources;
                Award ID: 1 C06 RR12463-01
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                imaging,mri,neoadjuvant chemotherapy,treatment response,radiomics,personalized medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article