6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Self‐obtained vaginal swabs are not inferior to provider‐performed endocervical sampling for emergency department diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d2508853e115">Provider-performed endocervical sampling (PPES) in the diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) may be difficult to perform in a busy emergency department (ED) due to patient preference, availability of the pelvic examination room, or provider availability. Our objective was to assess if self-obtained vaginal swabs (SOVS) were noninferior to PPES in the ED diagnosis of NG/CT using a rapid nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          Academic Emergency Medicine
          Acad Emerg Med
          Wiley
          1069-6563
          1553-2712
          June 2021
          March 24 2021
          June 2021
          : 28
          : 6
          : 612-620
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine UCSF–FresnoMedical Education Program Fresno California USA
          [2 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
          [3 ]University of California–Davis School of Medicine Sacramento California USA
          Article
          10.1111/acem.14213
          33460481
          3a290bd9-fede-4cf7-a02c-9779664ea68a
          © 2021

          http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

          http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article