0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Structure–function relationship and diagnostic value of macular ganglion cell complex measurement using Fourier-domain OCT in glaucoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          To evaluate the relationship between visual function and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness measured by Fourier–domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and evaluate the diagnostic value of GCC measurement compared to retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and macular thickness in detecting early, moderate, and severe glaucomas.

          Methods:

          Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), OCT imaging with optic nerve head mode and GCC mode. The relationship between OCT parameters (mean GCC thickness, mean RNFL thickness, and macular thickness) and perimetry global indices (mean deviation [MD] and pattern standard deviation [PSD]) was evaluated by regression analysis. Diagnostic values of mean RNFL thickness, GCC parameters, and macular thickness were compared with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).

          Results:

          A total of 84 eyes, 42 of each normal and primary open-angle glaucoma patients were included in the study. Compared with linear models, second-order polynomial models better described relationships between GCC thickness and MD ( P < 0.001), and between GCC thickness and PSD ( P = 0.00). RNFL parameter, inferior RNFL thickness had the highest AUC for detecting early glaucoma. The AUC of mean GCC thickness for early glaucoma was higher than that of mean RNFL; however, the difference was not significant ( P = 0.09), which was higher than that of macular thickness.

          Conclusion:

          The relationship between visual field (VF) sensitivity and GCC thickness is best expressed by the curvilinear function. Macular GCC thickness and RNFL thickness showed similar diagnostic values but were better than macular thickness for detecting early glaucoma but inferior to macular thickness and RNFL thickness for detecting moderate glaucoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

          Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are used to describe and compare the performance of diagnostic technology and diagnostic algorithms. This paper refines the statistical comparison of the areas under two ROC curves derived from the same set of patients by taking into account the correlation between the areas that is induced by the paired nature of the data. The correspondence between the area under an ROC curve and the Wilcoxon statistic is used and underlying Gaussian distributions (binormal) are assumed to provide a table that converts the observed correlations in paired ratings of images into a correlation between the two ROC areas. This between-area correlation can be used to reduce the standard error (uncertainty) about the observed difference in areas. This correction for pairing, analogous to that used in the paired t-test, can produce a considerable increase in the statistical sensitivity (power) of the comparison. For studies involving multiple readers, this method provides a measure of a component of the sampling variation that is otherwise difficult to obtain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Glaucomatous damage of the macula.

            There is a growing body of evidence that early glaucomatous damage involves the macula. The anatomical basis of this damage can be studied using frequency domain optical coherence tomography (fdOCT), by which the local thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and local retinal ganglion cell plus inner plexiform (RGC+) layer can be measured. Based upon averaged fdOCT results from healthy controls and patients, we show that: 1. For healthy controls, the average RGC+ layer thickness closely matches human histological data; 2. For glaucoma patients and suspects, the average RGC+ layer shows greater glaucomatous thinning in the inferior retina (superior visual field (VF)); and 3. The central test points of the 6° VF grid (24-2 test pattern) miss the region of greatest RGC+ thinning. Based upon fdOCT results from individual patients, we have learned that: 1. Local RGC+ loss is associated with local VF sensitivity loss as long as the displacement of RGCs from the foveal center is taken into consideration; and 2. Macular damage is typically arcuate in nature and often associated with local RNFL thinning in a narrow region of the disc, which we call the macular vulnerability zone (MVZ). According to our schematic model of macular damage, most of the inferior region of the macula projects to the MVZ, which is located largely in the inferior quadrant of the disc, a region that is particularly susceptible to glaucomatous damage. A small (cecocentral) region of the inferior macula, and all of the superior macula (inferior VF), project to the temporal quadrant, a region that is less susceptible to damage. The overall message is clear; clinicians need to be aware that glaucomatous damage to the macula is common, can occur early in the disease, and can be missed and/or underestimated with standard VF tests that use a 6° grid, such as the 24-2 VF test. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons.

              To compare the number of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) topographically mapped with specific visual field threshold test data in the same eyes among glaucoma patients. Seventeen eyes of 13 persons with well-documented glaucoma histories and Humphrey threshold visual field tests (San Leandro, CA) were obtained from eye banks. RGC number was estimated by histologic counts of retinal sections and by counts of remaining axons in the optic nerves. The locations of the retinal samples corresponded to specific test points in the visual field. The data for glaucoma patients were compared with 17 eyes of 17 persons who were group matched for age, had no ocular history, and had normal eyes by histologic examination. The mean RGC loss for the entire retina averaged 10.2%, indicating that many eyes had early glaucoma damage. RGC body loss averaged 35.7% in eyes with corrected pattern SD probability less than 0.5%. When upper to lower retina RGC counts were compared with their corresponding visual field data within each eye, a 5-dB loss in sensitivity was associated with 25% RGC loss. For individual points that were abnormal at a probability less than 0.5%, the mean RGC loss was 29%. In control eyes, the loss of RGCs with age was estimated as 7205 cells per year in persons between 55 and 95 years of age. In optic nerves from glaucoma subjects, smaller axons were significantly more likely to be present than larger axons (R2 = 0.78, P<0.001). At least 25% to 35% RGC loss is associated with statistical abnormalities in automated visual field testing. In addition, these data corroborate previous findings that RGCs with larger diameter axons preferentially die in glaucoma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                IJO
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0301-4738
                1998-3689
                March 2024
                15 December 2023
                : 72
                : 3
                : 363-369
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr. Rohit P Kende, Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur- 440 009, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: rohitkende1996@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                IJO-72-363
                10.4103/IJO.IJO_771_23
                11001241
                38108667
                3a1b2cc4-5399-4179-b34d-6244058bd687
                Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 20 March 2023
                : 26 July 2023
                : 02 August 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                gcc thickness,macular thickness,rnfl thickness
                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                gcc thickness, macular thickness, rnfl thickness

                Comments

                Comment on this article