71
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Overview of General and Discriminating Markers of Differential Microglia Phenotypes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Inflammatory processes and microglia activation accompany most of the pathophysiological diseases in the central nervous system. It is proven that glial pathology precedes and even drives the development of multiple neurodegenerative conditions. A growing number of studies point out the importance of microglia in brain development as well as in physiological functioning. These resident brain immune cells are divergent from the peripherally infiltrated macrophages, but their precise in situ discrimination is surprisingly difficult. Microglial heterogeneity in the brain is especially visible in their morphology and cell density in particular brain structures but also in the expression of cellular markers. This often determines their role in physiology or pathology of brain functioning. The species differences between rodent and human markers add complexity to the whole picture. Furthermore, due to activation, microglia show a broad spectrum of phenotypes ranging from the pro-inflammatory, potentially cytotoxic M1 to the anti-inflammatory, scavenging, and regenerative M2. A precise distinction of specific phenotypes is nowadays essential to study microglial functions and tissue state in such a quickly changing environment. Due to the overwhelming amount of data on multiple sets of markers that is available for such studies, the choice of appropriate markers is a scientific challenge. This review gathers, classifies, and describes known and recently discovered protein markers expressed by microglial cells in their different phenotypes. The presented microglia markers include qualitative and semi-quantitative, general and specific, surface and intracellular proteins, as well as secreted molecules. The information provided here creates a comprehensive and practical guide through the current knowledge and will facilitate the choosing of proper, more specific markers for detailed studies on microglia and neuroinflammatory mechanisms in various physiological as well as pathological conditions. Both basic research and clinical medicine need clearly described and validated molecular markers of microglia phenotype, which are essential in diagnostics, treatment, and prevention of diseases engaging glia activation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references186

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia

          A reactive astrocyte subtype termed A1 is induced after injury or disease of the central nervous system and subsequently promotes the death of neurons and oligodendrocytes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines.

            Description of macrophage activation is currently contentious and confusing. Like the biblical Tower of Babel, macrophage activation encompasses a panoply of descriptors used in different ways. The lack of consensus on how to define macrophage activation in experiments in vitro and in vivo impedes progress in multiple ways, including the fact that many researchers still consider there to be only two types of activated macrophages, often termed M1 and M2. Here, we describe a set of standards encompassing three principles-the source of macrophages, definition of the activators, and a consensus collection of markers to describe macrophage activation-with the goal of unifying experimental standards for diverse experimental scenarios. Collectively, we propose a common framework for macrophage-activation nomenclature. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment

              Macrophages are endowed with a variety of receptors for lineage-determining growth factors, T helper (Th) cell cytokines, and B cell, host, and microbial products. In tissues, macrophages mature and are activated in a dynamic response to combinations of these stimuli to acquire specialized functional phenotypes. As for the lymphocyte system, a dichotomy has been proposed for macrophage activation: classic vs. alternative, also M1 and M2, respectively. In view of recent research about macrophage functions and the increasing number of immune-relevant ligands, a revision of the model is needed. Here, we assess how cytokines and pathogen signals influence their functional phenotypes and the evidence for M1 and M2 functions and revisit a paradigm initially based on the role of a restricted set of selected ligands in the immune response.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cell Neurosci
                Front Cell Neurosci
                Front. Cell. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5102
                06 August 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 198
                Affiliations
                Maj Institute of Pharmacology, Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences , Krakow, Poland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Andrii Domanskyi, Orion Corporation (Finland), Finland

                Reviewed by: Anne Regnier-Vigouroux, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany; Susanna Amadio, Santa Lucia Foundation (IRCCS), Italy

                *Correspondence: Katarzyna Z. Kuter kuter@ 123456if-pan.krakow.pl

                ORCID: Agnieszka M. Jurga orcid.org/0000-0002-4314-5483 Martyna Paleczna orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-3188 Katarzyna Z. Kuter orcid.org/0000-0001-8210-6447

                Specialty section: This article was submitted to Non-Neuronal Cells, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fncel.2020.00198
                7424058
                32848611
                39b3138f-3e6b-40ef-aeef-673dcb4599d0
                Copyright © 2020 Jurga, Paleczna and Kuter.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 April 2020
                : 05 June 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 1, References: 181, Pages: 18, Words: 14495
                Funding
                Funded by: Narodowe Centrum Nauki 10.13039/501100004281
                Categories
                Cellular Neuroscience
                Review

                Neurosciences
                microglial heterogeneity,infiltrating macrophages,inflammation,polarization,m1/m2 phenotype,neurotoxicity,regeneration

                Comments

                Comment on this article