12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Power of a Positive Human–Animal Relationship for Animal Welfare

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Domestic animals often seek and enjoy interacting with humans. Positive human–animal relationships can elicit positive emotions and other positive welfare outcomes. Nevertheless, our understanding of the underlying processes that govern the positive perception of humans by animals is incomplete. We cover the potential mechanisms involved in the development and maintenance of positive human–animal relationships from the perspective of the animal. This encompasses habituation, associative learning, and possibly attachment or bonding based on communication and social cognition. We review the indicators from the literature to assess a positive human–animal relationship. We operationally define this positive relationship as the animal showing voluntary approach and spatial proximity (seeking) and signs of anticipation, pleasure, relaxation, or other indicators of a rewarding experience from interacting with the human. For research, we recommend accounting for the baseline human–animal relationship in the animal's everyday life, and incorporating a control treatment rather than only comparing positive to negative interaction treatments. Furthermore, animal characteristics, such as previous experience, genetics, and individual predisposition, as well as contextual characteristics related to the social and physical environment, may modulate the perception of humans by animals. The human–animal relationship is also influenced by human characteristics, such as the person's familiarity to the animal, attitudes, skills, and knowledge. We highlight implications for current practices and suggest simple solutions, such as paying attention to the animal's behavioral response to humans and providing choice and control to the animal in terms of when and how to interact with humans. Practical applications to achieve a positive perception of humans could be better utilized, such as by incorporating training principles, while keeping in mind trust and safety of both partners. Overall, there is growing evidence in the scientific literature that a positive human–animal relationship can bring intrinsic rewards to the animals and thereby benefit animal welfare. Further research is needed on the underlying processes to establish an effective positive human–animal relationship, especially in regard to the type, frequency, and length of human interaction necessary. In particular, the importance of providing animals with a sense of agency over their interactions with humans remains poorly understood.

          Related collections

          Most cited references173

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Multi-omics approaches to disease

          High-throughput technologies have revolutionized medical research. The advent of genotyping arrays enabled large-scale genome-wide association studies and methods for examining global transcript levels, which gave rise to the field of “integrative genetics”. Other omics technologies, such as proteomics and metabolomics, are now often incorporated into the everyday methodology of biological researchers. In this review, we provide an overview of such omics technologies and focus on methods for their integration across multiple omics layers. As compared to studies of a single omics type, multi-omics offers the opportunity to understand the flow of information that underlies disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Interactions, Relationships and Social Structure

            R. HINDE (1976)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Social evolution. Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds.

              Human-like modes of communication, including mutual gaze, in dogs may have been acquired during domestication with humans. We show that gazing behavior from dogs, but not wolves, increased urinary oxytocin concentrations in owners, which consequently facilitated owners' affiliation and increased oxytocin concentration in dogs. Further, nasally administered oxytocin increased gazing behavior in dogs, which in turn increased urinary oxytocin concentrations in owners. These findings support the existence of an interspecies oxytocin-mediated positive loop facilitated and modulated by gazing, which may have supported the coevolution of human-dog bonding by engaging common modes of communicating social attachment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                09 November 2020
                2020
                : 7
                : 590867
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine , Vienna, Austria
                [2] 2Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores , Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
                [3] 3Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne , Parkville, VIC, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Luigi Baciadonna, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Helen Gray, Newcastle University, United Kingdom; Monica Padilla De La Torre, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway

                *Correspondence: Jean-Loup Rault jean-loup.rault@ 123456vetmeduni.ac.at

                This article was submitted to Animal Behavior and Welfare, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2020.590867
                7680732
                32039255
                394e4005-8d42-47b8-922e-57acffbb37f8
                Copyright © 2020 Rault, Waiblinger, Boivin and Hemsworth.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 03 August 2020
                : 29 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 168, Pages: 13, Words: 11454
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Review

                agency,domestic,interaction,inter-species,perception,positive welfare,welfare assessment,well-being

                Comments

                Comment on this article