8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Right inferior frontal gyrus and ventromedial prefrontal activation during response inhibition is implicated in the development of PTSD symptoms Translated title: La activación del giro frontal inferior derecho y la corteza prefrontal ventromedial durante la inhibición de la respuesta está implicada en el desarrollo de síntomas de TEPT Translated title: PTSD 症状发展中涉及反应抑制期间的右侧额下回和腹内侧前额叶激活

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Inhibition is a critical executive control process and an established neurobiological phenotype of PTSD, yet to our knowledge, no prospective studies have examined this using a contextual cue task that enables measurement of behavioural response and neural activation patterns across proactive and reactive inhibition.

          Objective

          The current longitudinal study utilised functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine whether deficits in proactive and reactive inhibition predicted PTSD symptoms six months after trauma.

          Method

          Twenty-three (65% males) medical patients receiving emergency medical care from a level 1 trauma centre were enrolled in the study and invited for an MRI scan 1-2-months post-trauma. PTSD symptoms were measured using self-report at scan and 6-months post-trauma. A stop-signal anticipation task (SSAT) during an fMRI scan was used to test whether impaired behavioural proactive and reactive inhibition, and reduced activation in right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and bilateral hippocampus, were related to PTSD symptoms. We predicted that lower activation levels of vmPFC and rIFG during reactive inhibition and lower activation of hippocampus and rIFG during proactive inhibition would relate to higher 6-month PTSD symptoms.

          Results

          No significant associations were found between behavioural measures and 6-month PTSD. Separate linear regression analyses showed that reduced rIFG activation ( F 1,21 =  9.97, R 2 =  .32 , p = .005) and reduced vmPFC activation ( F 1,21 =  5.19, R 2 =  .20, p = .03) significantly predicted greater 6-month PTSD symptoms; this result held for rIFG activation controlling for demographic variables and baseline PTSD symptoms (β = −.45, p = .04) and Bonferroni correction.

          Conclusion

          Our findings suggest that impaired rIFG and, to a lesser extent, vmPFC activation during response inhibition may predict the development of PTSD symptoms following acute trauma exposure. Given the small sample size, future replication studies are needed.

          HIGHLIGHTS

          Impaired inhibition may be an important risk factor for the development of PTSD following trauma, with less right inferior frontal gyrus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation during response inhibition predicting PTSD development.

          Translated abstract

          Antecedentes: La inhibición es un proceso de control ejecutivo crítico, y un fenotipo neurobiológico establecido del TEPT, sin embargo, en nuestro conocimiento no hay estudios prospectivos que hayan examinado esto usando una tarea con claves contextuales que permita medir la respuesta conductual y los patrones de activación neuronal en la inhibición proactiva y reactiva.

          Objetivo: El siguiente estudio es de diseño longitudinal y utilizó resonancia magnética funcional (fMRI por sus siglas en inglés) para examinar si los déficit en inhibición proactiva y reactiva predijeron los síntomas de TEPT 6 meses después del trauma.

          Método: 23 pacientes (65% hombres) que recibieron cuidado médico de emergencia en un centro de trauma nivel 1 se enrolaron en el estudio y se les invitó a una RNM (resonancia nuclear magnética) 1–2 meses después del trauma. Los síntomas de TEPT se midieron usando auto-reporte al momento de la exploración y 6 meses después del trauma. Se uso una tarea de anticipación de señal de parada (SSAT por sus siglas en inglés) durante la RNM funcional para evaluar si la alteración en la inhibición proactiva y reactiva, y la reducción de la activación en el giro frontal inferior derecho (rIFG por sus siglas en inglés), la corteza prefrontal ventromedial (vmPFC por sus siglas en inglés), y el hipocampo bilateral, estuvieron relacionadas a los síntomas de TEPT. Predijimos que niveles bajos de activación de vmPFC y rIFG durante la inhibición proactiva se relacionaría con mayores síntomas de TEPT a los 6 meses.

          Resultados: No se encontraron asociaciones significativas entre medidas conductuales y TEPT a los 6 meses. Los análisis de regresión lineal separados mostraron que una activación reducida de rIFG ( F 1,21   = 9.97, R 2  = .32 , p = .005) y una activación reducida de vmPFC ( F 1,21  = 5.19, R 2  = .20, p = .03) predijeron significativamente mayores síntomas de TEPT a los 6 meses; este resultado fue corroborado para la activación de rIFG controlando para variables demográficas y síntomas basales de TEPT (β = −.45, p = .04) y para la corrección de Bonferroni.

          Conclusión: Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que una rIFG deficiente y, en menor grado, la activación del vmPFC durante la inhibición de la respuesta pueden predecir el desarrollo de síntomas de TEPT tras la exposición a un trauma agudo. Dado lo pequeño de la muestra, se requieren futuros estudios de replicación.

          Translated abstract

          背景:抑制是一个关键的执行控制过程和 PTSD 既定神经生物学表型,但据我们所知,没有前瞻性研究使用能够测量主动和反应抑制行为反应和神经激活模式的上下文提示任务来考查这一点.

          目的:本纵向研究利用功能性磁共振成像 (fMRI) 来考查主动和反应抑制不足是否可以预测创伤后六个月的 PTSD 症状.

          方法:23 名(65% 男性)从 1 级创伤中心接受紧急医疗护理的内科患者参加了研究,并在创伤后 1–2 个月被邀请进行了一项 MRI 扫描。在扫描时和创伤后 6 个月使用自我报告测量了 PTSD 症状。使用 fMRI 扫描期间的停止信号预期任务 (SSAT) 来检验是否受损的行为主动和反应抑制,以及右侧额下回 (rIFG)、腹内侧前额叶皮层 (vmPFC) 和双侧海马的激活减少是否与PTSD 症状相关。我们预测,在反应抑制期间 vmPFC 和 rIFG 的较低激活水平以及在主动抑制期间较低的海马和 rIFG 激活水平与6 个月时较高的 PTSD 症状有关.

          结果:在行为测量和 6 个月 PTSD 之间没有发现显著关联。单独的线性回归分析表明,减少的 rIFG 激活 (F 1,21 = 9.97, R 2 = .32, p = .005) 和减少的 vmPFC 激活 (F 1,21 = 5.19, R 2 = .20, p = .03) 显著预测更高的6个月时PTSD症状;这一结果在控制人口统计变量和基线 PTSD 症状 (β = −.45, p = .04) 和 Bonferroni 校正后对于 rIFG 激活仍成立.

          结论:我们的研究结果表明,在反应抑制期间受损的 rIFG 和较小程度的 vmPFC 激活可能预测急性创伤暴露后 PTSD 症状的发展。鉴于样本量小,未来需要进行重复研究.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

          Little is known about the general population prevalence or severity of DSM-IV mental disorders. To estimate 12-month prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of DSM-IV anxiety, mood, impulse control, and substance disorders in the recently completed US National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Nationally representative face-to-face household survey conducted between February 2001 and April 2003 using a fully structured diagnostic interview, the World Health Organization World Mental Health Survey Initiative version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Nine thousand two hundred eighty-two English-speaking respondents 18 years and older. Twelve-month DSM-IV disorders. Twelve-month prevalence estimates were anxiety, 18.1%; mood, 9.5%; impulse control, 8.9%; substance, 3.8%; and any disorder, 26.2%. Of 12-month cases, 22.3% were classified as serious; 37.3%, moderate; and 40.4%, mild. Fifty-five percent carried only a single diagnosis; 22%, 2 diagnoses; and 23%, 3 or more diagnoses. Latent class analysis detected 7 multivariate disorder classes, including 3 highly comorbid classes representing 7% of the population. Although mental disorders are widespread, serious cases are concentrated among a relatively small proportion of cases with high comorbidity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            National estimates of exposure to traumatic events and PTSD prevalence using DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria.

            Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) defined according to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual fifth edition (DSM-5; 2013) and fourth edition (DSM-IV; 1994) was compared in a national sample of U.S. adults (N = 2,953) recruited from an online panel. Exposure to traumatic events, PTSD symptoms, and functional impairment were assessed online using a highly structured, self-administered survey. Traumatic event exposure using DSM-5 criteria was high (89.7%), and exposure to multiple traumatic event types was the norm. PTSD caseness was determined using Same Event (i.e., all symptom criteria met to the same event type) and Composite Event (i.e., symptom criteria met to a combination of event types) definitions. Lifetime, past-12-month, and past 6-month PTSD prevalence using the Same Event definition for DSM-5 was 8.3%, 4.7%, and 3.8% respectively. All 6 DSM-5 prevalence estimates were slightly lower than their DSM-IV counterparts, although only 2 of these differences were statistically significant. DSM-5 PTSD prevalence was higher among women than among men, and prevalence increased with greater traumatic event exposure. Major reasons individuals met DSM-IV criteria, but not DSM-5 criteria were the exclusion of nonaccidental, nonviolent deaths from Criterion A, and the new requirement of at least 1 active avoidance symptom.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Psychotraumatol
                Eur J Psychotraumatol
                European Journal of Psychotraumatology
                Taylor & Francis
                2000-8198
                2000-8066
                11 April 2022
                2022
                11 April 2022
                : 13
                : 1
                : 2059993
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine , 69 Jesse Hill Jr Drive, Atlanta, GA, USA
                [b ]Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, GA, USA
                [c ]Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University , Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [d ]Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
                [e ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University , Detroit, MI, USA
                Author notes
                [CONTACT ] Abigail Powers abigail.lott@ 123456emoryhealthcare.org Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine , 69 Jesse Hill Jr Drive, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA

                Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2022.2059993

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-0314
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-7124
                Article
                2059993
                10.1080/20008198.2022.2059993
                9009908
                393d8646-c470-4a21-9372-58dbce2865cf
                © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 52, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Basic Research Article
                Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                trauma,posttraumatic stress disorder,reactive inhibition,mri,trastorno de estrés postraumático,inhibición reactiva,rnm,创伤,创伤后应激障碍,反应抑制

                Comments

                Comment on this article