7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Can intersectionality help with understanding and tackling health inequalities? Perspectives of professional stakeholders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The concept of “intersectionality” is increasingly employed within public health arenas, particularly in North America, and is often heralded as offering great potential to advance health inequalities research and action. Given persistently poor progress towards tackling health inequalities, and recent calls to reframe this agenda in the United Kingdom and Europe, the possible contribution of intersectionality deserves attention. Yet, no existing research has examined professional stakeholder understandings and perspectives on applying intersectionality to this field.

          Methods

          In this paper we seek to address that gap, drawing upon a consultation survey and face-to-face workshop ( n = 23) undertaken in the United Kingdom. The survey included both researchers ( n = 53) and policy and practice professionals ( n = 20) with varied roles and levels of engagement in research and evaluation. Topics included familiarity with the term and concept “intersectionality”, relevance to health inequalities work, and issues shaping its uptake. Respondents were also asked to comment on two specific policy suggestions: intersectionally targeting and tailoring interventions, and evaluating the intersectional effects of policies. The workshop aims were to share examples of applying intersectionality within health inequalities research and practice; understand the views of research and practice colleagues on potential contributions and challenges; and identify potential ways to promote intersectional approaches.

          Results

          Findings indicated a generally positive response to the concept and a cautiously optimistic assessment that intersectional approaches could be valuable. However, opinions were mixed and various challenges were raised, especially around whether intersectionality research is necessarily critical and transformative and, accordingly, how it should be operationalized methodologically. Nonetheless, there was general agreement that intersectionality is concerned with diverse inequalities and the systems of power that shape them.

          Conclusions

          We position intersectionality within the wider context of health inequalities policy and practice, suggesting potential ways forward for the approach in the context of the United Kingdom. The views of policy and practice professionals suggest that intersectionality has far to travel to help counter individualistic narratives and to encourage an approach that is sensitive to subgroup inequalities and the processes that generate them. Examples of promising practice, albeit mostly in North America, suggest that it is possible for intersectionality to gain traction.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00742-w.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The problem with the phrase women and minorities: intersectionality-an important theoretical framework for public health.

            Intersectionality is a theoretical framework that posits that multiple social categories (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status) intersect at the micro level of individual experience to reflect multiple interlocking systems of privilege and oppression at the macro, social-structural level (e.g., racism, sexism, heterosexism). Public health's commitment to social justice makes it a natural fit with intersectionality's focus on multiple historically oppressed populations. Yet despite a plethora of research focused on these populations, public health studies that reflect intersectionality in their theoretical frameworks, designs, analyses, or interpretations are rare. Accordingly, I describe the history and central tenets of intersectionality, address some theoretical and methodological challenges, and highlight the benefits of intersectionality for public health theory, research, and policy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Intersectionality's Definitional Dilemmas

              The term intersectionality references the critical insight that race, class, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, nation, ability, and age operate not as unitary, mutually exclusive entities, but rather as reciprocally constructing phenomena. Despite this general consensus, definitions of what counts as intersectionality are far from clear. In this article, I analyze intersectionality as a knowledge project whose raison d'être lies in its attentiveness to power relations and social inequalities. I examine three interdependent sets of concerns: (a) intersectionality as a field of study that is situated within the power relations that it studies; (b) intersectionality as an analytical strategy that provides new angles of vision on social phenomena; and (c) intersectionality as critical praxis that informs social justice projects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                daniel.holman@sheffield.ac.uk
                s.salway@sheffield.ac.uk
                andrew.j.d.bell@sheffield.ac.uk
                BrianBeach@ilcuk.org.uk
                a.o.adebajo@sheffield.ac.uk
                Nuzhat.Ali@phe.gov.uk
                jabeer@racefound.org.uk
                Journal
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Research Policy and Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1478-4505
                25 June 2021
                25 June 2021
                2021
                : 19
                : 97
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.11835.3e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, Department of Sociological Studies, , University of Sheffield, ; Elmfield building, Northumberland Road, Sheffield, S10 2TU United Kingdom
                [2 ]GRID grid.11835.3e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, Sheffield Methods Institute, Interdisciplinary Centre of the Social Sciences, , University of Sheffield, ; 219 Portobello, Sheffield, S1 4DP United Kingdom
                [3 ]GRID grid.498474.2, International Longevity Centre-UK. Vintage House, ; 36-37 Albert Embankment, Vauxhall, London, SE1 7TL United Kingdom
                [4 ]GRID grid.11835.3e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, Centre for Assistive Technology and Connected Healthcare, , University of Sheffield, ; 217 Portobello, Sheffield, S1 4DP United Kingdom
                [5 ]Public Health England. Seaton House, City Link, Nottingham, NG2 4LA United Kingdom
                [6 ]GRID grid.499474.3, Race Equality Foundation, ; 27 Greenwood Pl, Kentish Town, London, NW5 1LB United Kingdom
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-6238
                Article
                742
                10.1186/s12961-021-00742-w
                8227357
                34172066
                39105031-326b-4922-8d47-290bddf8d62b
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 8 March 2021
                : 30 May 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269, Economic and Social Research Council;
                Award ID: ES/R00921X/1
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012349, School for Public Health Research;
                Award ID: PD-SPH-2015-10025
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Health & Social care
                intersectionality,survey,workshop,health inequalities,stakeholder engagement,health policy,co-production,uk,evidence-based policy

                Comments

                Comment on this article