5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The incidence of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather epidemiological information on selected musculoskeletal injuries and to provide pooled injury-specific incidence rates.

          Methods

          PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported incidence rate (or count with population at risk), contained data on adult population, and were written in English language. The number of cases and population at risk were collected, and the pooled incidence rates (per 100,000 person-years) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either a fixed or random effects model.

          Results

          The screening of titles yielded 206 articles eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 173 (84%) articles provided sufficient information to be included in the pooled incidence rates. Incidences of fractures were investigated in 154 studies, and the most common fractures in the whole adult population based on the pooled incidence rates were distal radius fractures (212.0, 95% CI 178.1 to 252.4 per 100,000 person-years), finger fractures (117.1, 95% CI 105.3 to 130.2 per 100,000 person-years), and hip fractures (112.9, 95% CI 82.2 to 154.9 per 100,000 person-years). The most common sprains and dislocations were ankle sprains (429.4, 95% CI 243.0 to 759.0 per 100,000 person-years) and first-time patellar dislocations (32.8, 95% CI 21.6 to 49.7 per 100,000 person-years). The most common injuries were anterior cruciate ligament (17.5, 95% CI 6.0 to 50.2 per 100,000 person-years) and Achilles (13.7, 95% CI 9.6 to 19.5 per 100,000 person-years) ruptures.

          Conclusion

          The presented pooled incidence estimates serve as important references in assessing the global economic and social burden of musculoskeletal injuries.

          Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(11):814–825.

          Related collections

          Most cited references163

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.

          There currently does not exist guidance for authors aiming to undertake systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies, such as those reporting prevalence and incidence information. These reviews are particularly useful to measure global disease burden and changes in disease over time. The aim of this article is to provide guidance for conducting these types of reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review.

            The epidemiology of adult fractures is changing quickly. An analysis of 5953 fractures reviewed in a single orthopaedic trauma unit in 2000 showed that there are eight different fracture distribution curves into which all fractures can be placed. Only two fracture curves involve predominantly young patients; the other six show an increased incidence of fractures in older patients. It is popularly assumed that osteoporotic fractures are mainly seen in the thoracolumbar spine, proximal femur, proximal humerus and distal radius, but analysis of the data indicates that 14 different fractures should now be considered to be potentially osteoporotic. About 30% of fractures in men, 66% of fractures in women and 70% of inpatient fractures are potentially osteoporotic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence.

              Recently there has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Key features of a systematic review include the creation of an a priori protocol, clear inclusion criteria, a structured and systematic search process, critical appraisal of studies, and a formal process of data extraction followed by methods to synthesize, or combine, this data. Currently there exists no standard method for conducting critical appraisal of studies in systematic reviews of prevalence data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Orthopaedic surgery resident
                Role: Researcher
                Role: Researcher
                Role: Researcher
                Role: Orthopaedic surgeon
                Role: Surgery resident
                Journal
                Bone Joint Res
                Bone Joint Res
                BJR
                Bone & Joint Research
                The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery (London )
                2046-3758
                November 2022
                15 November 2022
                : 11
                : 11
                : 814-825
                Affiliations
                [1 ] org-divisionDepartment of Surgery , org-divisionCentral Finland Hospital Nova , Jyväskylä, Finland
                [2 ] org-divisionUniversity of Eastern Finland, Institute of Clinical Medicine , Kuopio, Finland
                [3 ] org-divisionTampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology , Tampere, Finland
                Author notes
                Ville Ponkilainen. E-mail: ville.ponkilainen@ 123456tuni.fi
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-4560
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8178-9610
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-3193
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-6173
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6903-6461
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-1345
                Article
                BJR-11-814
                10.1302/2046-3758.1111.BJR-2022-0181.R1
                9680199
                36374291
                38d0769f-d813-4213-936f-5ba8497e3cc8
                © 2022 Author(s) et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Total Disc Replacement
                Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
                Degenerative Spine Disease
                Meta-Analysis
                Systematic Review
                bj17439, Trauma
                bj731, Anatomy
                bj10602, Musculoskeletal injuries
                bj6903, Hip fractures
                bj931, Anterior cruciate ligament
                bj14339, Ruptures
                bj11977, Patellar dislocations
                bj847, Ankle sprains
                bj15493, Sprains
                bj4739, Distal radius fracture
                bj5851, Finger fractures
                bj12188, Pelvis fractures
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                $2.00
                Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä, Finland
                Systematic Review
                The authors received no financial support for this study. The authors declare to not have any competing interests.

                epidemiology,public health,injuries,musculoskeletal injuries,hip fractures,anterior cruciate ligament (acl),ruptures,patellar dislocations,ankle sprains,sprains,distal radius fractures,finger fractures,pelvic fractures

                Comments

                Comment on this article