11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Action on neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD): recommendations for management and service provision in the UK hospital eye service

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Disclaimer

          This publication and the expert roundtable meeting on which the article is based were sponsored by Bayer plc. Prescribing information for Eylea ® (aflibercept solution for injection) can be found at the end of the article.

          Abstract

          This report by a group of UK retina specialists and health professionals considers best practice recommendations for the management of sight-threatening neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), based on collective experience and expertise in routine clinical practice. The authors provide an update for ophthalmologists, allied healthcare professionals and commissioners on practice principles for optimal patient care and service provision standards. Refinement of care pathways for nAMD has improved access to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy but there are still variations in care and reported outcomes between clinic centres. Innovative organisational models of service provision allow providers to better match capacity with increasing demand. The authors review the recent NICE guideline for diagnosis and management of AMD, considerations for switching therapies and stopping treatment and need for regular monitoring of non-affected fellow eyes in patients with unilateral nAMD. Actions for delivery of high-quality care and to improve long-term patient outcomes are discussed. Local pathways need to detail nAMD target time to treat, maintenance of review intervals to ensure proactive treatment regimens are delivered on time and appropriate discharge for patients deemed low risk or no longer benefiting from treatment. Actual visual acuity outcomes achieved and maintenance of the level of vision when disease stability is achieved are considered good measures for judging the quality of care in the treatment of patients with nAMD. Robust community referral pathways must be in place for suspected reactivation of choroidal neovascularisation and rapid referral for second eye involvement. Practical considerations for intravitreal injection therapy are outlined.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

          Clinical trials have established the efficacy of ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In addition, bevacizumab is used off-label to treat AMD, despite the absence of similar supporting data. In a multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 1208 patients with neovascular AMD to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab on either a monthly schedule or as needed with monthly evaluation. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity at 1 year, with a noninferiority limit of 5 letters on the eye chart. Bevacizumab administered monthly was equivalent to ranibizumab administered monthly, with 8.0 and 8.5 letters gained, respectively. Bevacizumab administered as needed was equivalent to ranibizumab as needed, with 5.9 and 6.8 letters gained, respectively. Ranibizumab as needed was equivalent to monthly ranibizumab, although the comparison between bevacizumab as needed and monthly bevacizumab was inconclusive. The mean decrease in central retinal thickness was greater in the ranibizumab-monthly group (196 μm) than in the other groups (152 to 168 μm, P=0.03 by analysis of variance). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were similar for patients receiving either bevacizumab or ranibizumab (P>0.20). The proportion of patients with serious systemic adverse events (primarily hospitalizations) was higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab (24.1% vs. 19.0%; risk ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.66), with excess events broadly distributed in disease categories not identified in previous studies as areas of concern. At 1 year, bevacizumab and ranibizumab had equivalent effects on visual acuity when administered according to the same schedule. Ranibizumab given as needed with monthly evaluation had effects on vision that were equivalent to those of ranibizumab administered monthly. Differences in rates of serious adverse events require further study. (Funded by the National Eye Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00593450.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA)

            Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is still referred to as the leading cause of severe and irreversible visual loss world-wide. The disease has a profound effect on quality of life of affected individuals and represents a major socioeconomic challenge for societies due to the exponential increase in life expectancy and environmental risks. Advances in medical research have identified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as an important pathophysiological player in neovascular AMD and intraocular inhibition of VEGF as one of the most efficient therapies in medicine. The wide introduction of anti-VEGF therapy has led to an overwhelming improvement in the prognosis of patients affected by neovascular AMD, allowing recovery and maintenance of visual function in the vast majority of patients. However, the therapeutic benefit is accompanied by significant economic investments, unresolved medicolegal debates about the use of off-label substances and overwhelming problems in large population management. The burden of disease has turned into a burden of care with a dissociation of scientific advances and real-world clinical performance. Simultaneously, ground-breaking innovations in diagnostic technologies, such as optical coherence tomography, allows unprecedented high-resolution visualisation of disease morphology and provides a promising horizon for early disease detection and efficient therapeutic follow-up. However, definite conclusions from morphologic parameters are still lacking, and valid biomarkers have yet to be identified to provide a practical base for disease management. The European Society of Retina Specialists offers expert guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic management of neovascular AMD supporting healthcare givers and doctors in providing the best state-of-the-art care to their patients. Trial registration number NCT01318941.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Real-world outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44 (0)190 472 6758 , Richard.Gale@york.nhs.uk
                Journal
                Eye (Lond)
                Eye (Lond)
                Eye
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0950-222X
                1476-5454
                29 March 2019
                29 March 2019
                March 2019
                : 33
                : Suppl 1
                : 1-21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Action on nAMD Group, Birmingham, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9080 8425, GRID grid.417375.3, The York Hospital, ; York, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0641 2866, GRID grid.416375.2, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, ; Manchester, UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0379 5398, GRID grid.418449.4, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Bradford, UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2116 3923, GRID grid.451056.3, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, ; London, UK
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0380 7336, GRID grid.410421.2, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, ; Bristol, UK
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0408 8513, GRID grid.462305.6, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, ; Harrogate, UK
                [8 ]GRID grid.417700.5, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, ; Hull, UK
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0478 4463, GRID grid.440196.e, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, ; Warwickshire, UK
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9422 8284, GRID grid.31410.37, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Sheffield, UK
                [11 ]Simon Berry Optometrist, Durham, UK
                [12 ]GRID grid.465123.7, Bayer, ; Reading, UK
                Article
                300
                10.1038/s41433-018-0300-3
                6474281
                30926932
                38c3a9fb-4fbc-4d08-aaf0-045052b93119
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Consensus Statement
                Custom metadata
                © The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2019

                Vision sciences
                Vision sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article