24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Studies

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Compared with oral antipsychotics (OAPs), long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) should improve medication adherence and reduce relapses in schizophrenia. However, meta-analyses of randomized trials and mirror-image studies yielded inconsistent results. Nonrandomized cohort studies with parallel comparisons of LAIs and OAPs offer a third design to examine this issue. We meta-analyzed cohort studies with ≥24 weeks duration and hospitalization data. Primary outcome was hospitalization rate, ie, number of hospitalizations per person-year. Secondary outcomes included hospitalization risk, ie, proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 hospitalizations, all-cause discontinuation, and total hospitalization days. Patient severity and/or chronicity at baseline was also meta-analyzed and explored as a potential effect size moderator. Altogether, 42 studies (n = 101 624; follow-up = 18.6 ± 10.0 mo) were meta-analyzed. LAIs were superior to OAPs regarding hospitalization rate (studies = 15, person-years = 68 009, rate ratio = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.78-0.93, P < .001) and all-cause discontinuations (studies = 10, n = 37 293, risk ratio = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67-0.91, P = .001), but not regarding hospitalization risk (studies = 33, n = 51 733, risk ratio = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.84-1.00, P = .06), and hospitalization days (studies = 11, n = 21 328, Hedges' g = -0.05, 95% CI = -0.16 to 0.06, P = .39). Illness severity/chronicity was significantly greater in patients prescribed LAIs vs OAPs when all available information was pooled together (studies = 23, n = 61 806, Hedges' g = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.26, P = .01), but not when examined separately. In summary, this meta-analysis of cohort studies, which included patients that are broadly representative of clinical practice, indicates that LAIs are superior to OAPs. The lack of significant superiority of LAIs for hospitalization risk and hospital days needs to be interpreted in the context of naturalistic treatment selection with subsequently greater illness severity/chronicity in LAI-treated patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Schizophrenia Bulletin
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          0586-7614
          1745-1701
          May 2018
          April 06 2018
          July 27 2017
          May 2018
          April 06 2018
          July 27 2017
          : 44
          : 3
          : 603-619
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
          [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY
          [3 ]Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY
          [4 ]Center of Psychiatric Neuroscience, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY
          [5 ]Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Medical Affairs, Tokyo, Japan
          [6 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
          [7 ]New York State Psychiatric Institute/Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY
          [8 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
          Article
          10.1093/schbul/sbx090
          5890463
          29868849
          385363c1-b5a1-433e-a56b-c584dca84f59
          © 2017

          https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content1,166

          Cited by64

          Most referenced authors20