7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          PURPOSE

          Targeting the BCL-X L pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X L/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609).

          METHODS

          Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 10 9/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR 35) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS 50) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety.

          RESULTS

          High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR 35 was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR 35 of 13.8 months. TSS 50 was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%).

          CONCLUSION

          The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR 35, improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis.

            Ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2, has clinically significant activity in myelofibrosis. In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis to twice-daily oral ruxolitinib (155 patients) or placebo (154 patients). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a reduction in spleen volume of 35% or more at 24 weeks, assessed by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary end points included the durability of response, changes in symptom burden (assessed by the total symptom score), and overall survival. The primary end point was reached in 41.9% of patients in the ruxolitinib group as compared with 0.7% in the placebo group (P<0.001). A reduction in spleen volume was maintained in patients who received ruxolitinib; 67.0% of the patients with a response had the response for 48 weeks or more. There was an improvement of 50% or more in the total symptom score at 24 weeks in 45.9% of patients who received ruxolitinib as compared with 5.3% of patients who received placebo (P<0.001). Thirteen deaths occurred in the ruxolitinib group as compared with 24 deaths in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.98; P=0.04). The rate of discontinuation of the study drug because of adverse events was 11.0% in the ruxolitinib group and 10.6% in the placebo group. Among patients who received ruxolitinib, anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most common adverse events, but they rarely led to discontinuation of the drug (in one patient for each event). Two patients had transformation to acute myeloid leukemia; both were in the ruxolitinib group. Ruxolitinib, as compared with placebo, provided significant clinical benefits in patients with myelofibrosis by reducing spleen size, ameliorating debilitating myelofibrosis-related symptoms, and improving overall survival. These benefits came at the cost of more frequent anemia and thrombocytopenia in the early part of the treatment period. (Funded by Incyte; COMFORT-I ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00952289.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ABT-263: a potent and orally bioavailable Bcl-2 family inhibitor.

              Overexpression of the prosurvival Bcl-2 family members (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1) is commonly associated with tumor maintenance, progression, and chemoresistance. We previously reported the discovery of ABT-737, a potent, small-molecule Bcl-2 family protein inhibitor. A major limitation of ABT-737 is that it is not orally bioavailable, which would limit chronic single agent therapy and flexibility to dose in combination regimens. Here we report the biological properties of ABT-263, a potent, orally bioavailable Bad-like BH3 mimetic (K(i)'s of <1 nmol/L for Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w). The oral bioavailability of ABT-263 in preclinical animal models is 20% to 50%, depending on formulation. ABT-263 disrupts Bcl-2/Bcl-xL interactions with pro-death proteins (e.g., Bim), leading to the initiation of apoptosis within 2 hours posttreatment. In human tumor cells, ABT-263 induces Bax translocation, cytochrome c release, and subsequent apoptosis. Oral administration of ABT-263 alone induces complete tumor regressions in xenograft models of small-cell lung cancer and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In xenograft models of aggressive B-cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma where ABT-263 exhibits modest or no single agent activity, it significantly enhances the efficacy of clinically relevant therapeutic regimens. These data provide the rationale for clinical trials evaluating ABT-263 in small-cell lung cancer and B-cell malignancies. The oral efficacy of ABT-263 should provide dosing flexibility to maximize clinical utility both as a single agent and in combination regimens.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Oncol
                J Clin Oncol
                jco
                JCO
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                20 May 2022
                18 February 2022
                18 February 2022
                : 40
                : 15
                : 1671-1680
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
                [ 2 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
                [ 3 ]The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [ 4 ]Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [ 5 ]Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
                [ 6 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
                [ 7 ]University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
                [ 8 ]University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
                [ 9 ]Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
                [ 10 ]University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
                [ 11 ]O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, Birmingham, AL
                [ 12 ]University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
                [ 13 ]Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
                [ 14 ]AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL
                Author notes
                Naveen Pemmaraju, MD, Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: npemmaraju@ 123456mdanderson.org .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-920X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2118-6302
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-4379
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-1708
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-8569
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8057-6613
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5880-7972
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9779-6217
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-5269
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1670-6513
                Article
                JCO.21.02188 00010
                10.1200/JCO.21.02188
                9113204
                35180010
                3839ffd4-a49a-4cb9-9e0b-56c726891316
                © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 13 September 2021
                : 21 December 2021
                : 13 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 45, Pages: 0
                Categories
                ORIGINAL REPORTS
                Hematologic Malignancy
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article