3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ethics and diversity in artificial intelligence policies, strategies and initiatives

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A burgeoning of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in recent years has led to increased discussion about its potential to address many issues considered otherwise intractable, including those highlighted by the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and associated Sustainable Development Goals. In tandem with this growth in AI is an expanding body of documentation regarding how such advanced technologies should be governed and managed. Issued by a variety of sources and comprising frameworks, policies and guidelines, this body of work encompasses the legal, social, ethical and policy issues around AI. With at least 470 such documents identified, as of May 2021, in the Council of Europe’s tracker of AI initiatives, questions are emerging around the diversity of views expressed, especially regarding the influence of the Global North or Euro-American perspectives. Our previous analysis of a corpus of largely grey literature discovered blind spots regarding both gender representation and perspectives from the Global South. Expanding on that work, this paper examines a significantly extended corpus, with a focus on the role of underrepresented groups in the wider AI discourse. We find that voices from the Global South and consideration of alternative ethical approaches are largely absent from the conversation. In light of the prominence of social, cultural and ethical perspectives from the Global North, this paper explores implications for the development of standards for ethical AI. Concluding by offering approaches to incorporate more diverse ethical viewpoints and beliefs, we call for increased consideration of power structures when developing AI ethics policies and standards within these alternative socio-cultural and socio-economic contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations

              This article reports the findings of AI4People, an Atomium—EISMD initiative designed to lay the foundations for a “Good AI Society”. We introduce the core opportunities and risks of AI for society; present a synthesis of five ethical principles that should undergird its development and adoption; and offer 20 concrete recommendations—to assess, to develop, to incentivise, and to support good AI—which in some cases may be undertaken directly by national or supranational policy makers, while in others may be led by other stakeholders. If adopted, these recommendations would serve as a firm foundation for the establishment of a Good AI Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                croche7@tcd.ie
                wallp2@tcd.ie
                dave.lewis@adaptcentre.ie
                Journal
                AI Ethics
                AI Ethics
                Ai and Ethics
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2730-5953
                2730-5961
                6 October 2022
                6 October 2022
                : 1-21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.8217.c, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9705, Science Foundation Ireland, CRT-AI, , Trinity College Dublin, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [2 ]GRID grid.8217.c, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9705, ADAPT Centre, , Trinity College Dublin, ; Dublin, Ireland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-5494
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-4425
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-4644
                Article
                218
                10.1007/s43681-022-00218-9
                9540088
                3838ea17-7686-4a11-b319-825ad7c1b6ca
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 1 May 2022
                : 6 September 2022
                Categories
                Original Research

                artificial intelligence,ai ethics,diversity,intersectionality,power

                Comments

                Comment on this article