29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A retrospective review of mortality and complications following oesophagectomy in a large UK teaching hospital

      abstract
      1 , , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Critical Care
      BioMed Central
      34th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
      18-21 March 2014

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Just over 1,200 curative oesophagectomies are carried out in the UK annually. Although in-hospital mortality rates have fallen (12 to 13% in 1998 to 2.5% 2013), complication rates remain high [1] with anastomotic failure and respiratory failure common postoperatively [2]. The aim of this retrospective review was to examine the outcomes in patients who underwent oesophagectomies in our unit between January 2010 and October 2012. Methods We examined demographic data, survival (30 day and 1 year) and length of ICU and hospital stay. Case notes were reviewed to identify postoperative complications including anastomotic breakdown, reintubation and respiratory failure. Data were analysed to examine the relationship between the use of postoperative non- invasive ventilation and intraoperative fluid volume and the incidence of postoperative complications. Results Seventy-two patients were identified as having undergone an oesophagectomy between January 2010 and October 2012. Median age was 65 and 82% were male. One patient died within 30 days (1.39%) and nine patients had died by 1 year (12.5%). The median length of ICU and hospital stay was 4 days and 14 days respectively. Six patients had an anastomotic leak (of which two were chyle leaks). Use of non- invasive ventilation (in 23.1% of patients) was not associated with an anastomotic leak (chi-square P = 0.53), nor was the amount of fluid given intraoperatively (Mann-Whitney U P = 0.410). Six patients had to be reintubated and this was associated with a significantly increased length of both ICU and hospital stay (Mann-Whitney U P = 0.01 and 0.03 respectively). Lower P/F ratios were also associated with a significant increase in length of both ICU and hospital stay (P = 0.007 and 0.043). Conclusion The overall mortality and morbidity rate was comparable with that seen nationally. Our data suggest that the use of non-invasive ventilation was not associated with anastomotic breakdown. A lower P/F ratio in the postoperative period was associated with prolonged ICU and hospital stay.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Conference
          Crit Care
          Crit Care
          Critical Care
          BioMed Central
          1364-8535
          1466-609X
          2014
          17 March 2014
          : 18
          : Suppl 1
          : P59
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Sheffield Teaching Hospital, Sheffield, UK
          Article
          cc13249
          10.1186/cc13249
          4068178
          37f1884d-b346-4406-9881-368c6e8868d1
          Copyright © 2014 Pawley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

          34th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
          Brussels, Belgium
          18-21 March 2014
          History
          Categories
          Poster Presentation

          Emergency medicine & Trauma
          Emergency medicine & Trauma

          Comments

          Comment on this article