2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The unintended consequences of tolerance: The experience and repercussions of being tolerated for minority group members

      research-article
      1 , 2 , * , , 1
      PLOS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tolerance as forbearance implies the decision to not interfere when others engage in actions or beliefs that you disapprove of. This allows minorities to live the life that they want, despite the disapproval. However, the undercurrent of disapproval which comes with tolerance might carry unintended negative consequences for tolerated minorities. The present research utilizes a novel experimental method to give participants an experience of being tolerated to address two key questions: 1) what are the consequences of being tolerated on personal well-being? 2) how does the experience of being tolerated affect future expectations and willingness to raise one’s voice? Across four studies with American and Dutch participants ( N = 1,758), we find that being tolerated leads to less positive outcomes on well-being than being accepted (although more positive implications relative to being rejected). Further, being tolerated reduces the expectation of being valued in future encounters while simultaneously tamping down on people’s willingness to raise their voice against those who begrudgingly include them.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review.

          Perceived discrimination has been studied with regard to its impact on several types of health effects. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive account of the relationships between multiple forms of perceived discrimination and both mental and physical health outcomes. In addition, this meta-analysis examines potential mechanisms by which perceiving discrimination may affect health, including through psychological and physiological stress responses and health behaviors. Analysis of 134 samples suggests that when weighting each study's contribution by sample size, perceived discrimination has a significant negative effect on both mental and physical health. Perceived discrimination also produces significantly heightened stress responses and is related to participation in unhealthy and nonparticipation in healthy behaviors. These findings suggest potential pathways linking perceived discrimination to negative health outcomes. Copyright (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Mini Meta-Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: a meta-analytic review.

              In 2 meta-analyses, we examined the relationship between perceived discrimination and psychological well-being and tested a number of moderators of that relationship. In Meta-Analysis 1 (328 independent effect sizes, N = 144,246), we examined correlational data measuring both perceived discrimination and psychological well-being (e.g., self-esteem, depression, anxiety, psychological distress, life satisfaction). Using a random-effects model, the mean weighted effect size was significantly negative, indicating harm (r = -.23). Effect sizes were larger for disadvantaged groups (r = -.24) compared to advantaged groups (r = -.10), larger for children compared to adults, larger for perceptions of personal discrimination compared to group discrimination, and weaker for racism and sexism compared to other stigmas. The negative relationship was significant across different operationalizations of well-being but was somewhat weaker for positive outcomes (e.g., self-esteem, positive affect) than for negative outcomes (e.g., depression, anxiety, negative affect). Importantly, the effect size was significantly negative even in longitudinal studies that controlled for prior levels of well-being (r = -.15). In Meta-Analysis 2 (54 independent effect sizes, N = 2,640), we examined experimental data from studies manipulating perceptions of discrimination and measuring well-being. We found that the effect of discrimination on well-being was significantly negative for studies that manipulated general perceptions of discrimination (d = -.25), but effects did not differ from 0 when attributions to discrimination for a specific negative event were compared to personal attributions (d = .06). Overall, results support the idea that the pervasiveness of perceived discrimination is fundamental to its harmful effects on psychological well-being.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLOS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                22 March 2023
                2023
                : 18
                : 3
                : e0282073
                Affiliations
                [1 ] ERCOMER, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
                [2 ] School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
                Universidad Central de Chile, CHILE
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-5077
                Article
                PONE-D-22-24797
                10.1371/journal.pone.0282073
                10032513
                36947500
                37c4abc6-c09c-493e-a8b4-17b2855cbf29
                © 2023 Adelman et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 5 September 2022
                : 8 February 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 7, Pages: 21
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010663, H2020 European Research Council;
                Award ID: 740788
                Award Recipient :
                This research was supported by a European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant awarded to MV under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No 740788). The funder played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of this manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Attitudes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Applied Mathematics
                Game Theory
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Experimental Psychology
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Experimental Psychology
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                North America
                United States
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Social Psychology
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Social Psychology
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Europe
                European Union
                Netherlands
                Custom metadata
                The data relevant to this study are available from OSF at https://osf.io/ad9ec/.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article