12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      STING promotes the growth of tumors characterized by low antigenicity via IDO activation

      research-article
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cytosolic DNA sensing is an important process during the innate immune response that activates the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) adaptor and induce interferon type I (IFN-I). STING incites spontaneous immunity during immunogenic tumor growth and accordingly, STING agonists induce regression of therapy-resistant tumors. However DNA, STING agonists and apoptotic cells can also promote tolerogenic responses via STING by activating immunoregulatory mechanisms such as indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase (IDO). Here, we show that IDO activity induced by STING activity in the tumor microenvironment (TME) promoted the growth of Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC). While STING also induced IDO in tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) during EL4 thymoma growth, this event was insufficient to promote tumorigenesis. In the LLC model, STING ablation enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration and tumor cell killing while decreasing myeloid-derived suppressor cell infiltration and IL-10 production in the TME. Depletion of CD8+ T cells also eliminated the growth disadvantage of LLC tumors in STING-deficient mice, indicating that STING signaling attenuated CD8+ T cell effector functions during tumorigenesis. In contrast to native LLC tumors, STING signaling did not promote growth of neoantigen-expressing LLC, nor did it induce IDO in TDLN. Similarly, STING failed to promote growth of B16 melanoma or to induce IDO activity in TDLN in this setting. Thus, our results show how STING-dependent DNA sensing can enhance tolerogenic states in tumors characterized by low antigenicity, and how IDO inhibition can overcome this state by attenuating tumor tolerance. Further, our results reveal a greater complexity in the role of STING signaling in cancer, underscoring how innate immune pathways in the TME modify tumorigenesis in distinct tumor settings, with implications for designing effective immunotherapy trials.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          2984705R
          2786
          Cancer Res
          Cancer Res.
          Cancer research
          0008-5472
          1538-7445
          3 May 2016
          10 March 2016
          15 April 2016
          15 April 2017
          : 76
          : 8
          : 2076-2081
          Affiliations
          Cancer immunology, Inflammation and Tolerance Program, Georgia Regents University, 1120 15 th St., Augusta GA 30912 USA
          [1 ]Department of Radiology, Georgia Regents University, 1120 15 th St., Augusta GA 30912 USA
          [2 ]Tumor Angiogenesis Program, Cancer Center, Georgia Regents University, 1120 15 th St., Augusta GA 30912 USA
          [2 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Georgia Regents University, 1120 15 th St., Augusta GA 30912 USA
          [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, Georgia Regents University, 1120 15 th St., Augusta GA 30912 USA
          [4 ]Department of Medicine, Georgia Regents University, 1120 15 th St., Augusta GA 30912 USA
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Andrew L Mellor, Cancer immunology, Inflammation and Tolerance Program, Cancer Center, Augusta University, 1120 15 th St., Augusta GA 30912. Phone 706-721-8735: Fax; 706-721-8732: amellor@ 123456gru.edu
          [*]

          H. Lemos, E. Mohamed and L. Huang contributed equally to this article.

          Current Address: Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Phone 0191-208-8503: Fax; 0191-208-5606: Andrew.mellor@ 123456ncl.ac.uk .

          Article
          PMC4873329 PMC4873329 4873329 nihpa778048
          10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1456
          4873329
          26964621
          37a08370-21ab-413f-a7f1-76ee7ad078cc
          History
          Categories
          Article

          DNA sensing,STING,IDO
          DNA sensing, STING, IDO

          Comments

          Comment on this article