Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anti-Hu Antibodies in Patients With Neurologic Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives

          To clinically characterize post–immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) Hu antibody (Ab) neurologic disorders, we analyzed Hu-Ab–positive patients with neurologic immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs) and compared them with patients with other n-irAEs, ICI-naive patients with Hu-Ab paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) identified in the same study center, and those with Hu-Ab n-irAEs reported elsewhere.

          Methods

          Patients whose samples were sent to the French reference center for a suspicion of n-irAE (2015–2021) were identified; those with a final diagnosis of n-irAE and Hu-Ab were included. Control groups included patients with a final diagnosis of n-irAE occurring during the same period as the patients included (2018–2021) but without Hu-Ab, and ICI-naive patients with Hu-Ab PNS diagnosed during the same period; a systematic review was performed to identify previous reports.

          Results

          Eleven patients with Hu-Ab and n-irAEs were included (median age, 66 years, range 44–76 years; 73% men). Ten patients had small cell lung cancer, and 1 had lung adenocarcinoma. The median follow-up from onset was 3 months (range 0.5–18 months). Compared with those with other n-irAEs (n = 63), Hu-Ab–positive patients had more frequently co-occurring involvement of both central and peripheral nervous systems (36% vs 8%, p = 0.02) and limbic (54% vs 14%, p < 0.01), brainstem (27% vs 5%, p = 0.02), and dorsal root ganglia (45% vs 5%, p < 0.01) involvement. The proportion of patients with severe disability (modified Rankin Scale score >3) at diagnosis was higher among Hu-Ab n-irAEs (91% vs 52%, p = 0.02). Patients with Hu-Ab had also poorer outcome (100% vs 28%, p < 0.01) and higher mortality (91% vs 46%, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in terms of clinical features between Hu-Ab n-irAEs and ICI-naive Hu-Ab PNS (n = 92), but there was a poorer outcome (56/78, 71%, p < 0.01) and higher mortality (26%, p < 0.01) among the former. No significant difference was found between the patients reported herein and those in the literature.

          Discussion

          The presence of Hu-Ab identifies a subgroup of n-irAEs that consistently reproduce the phenotypes of Hu-Ab-related PNS, supporting the hypothesis of ICI triggering or unmasking PNS. As these patients show high disability and mortality, further studies are required to investigate the underlying immunopathogenic mechanisms and to improve the outcome of Hu-Ab n-irAEs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade

          The release of negative regulators of immune activation (immune checkpoints) that limit antitumor responses has resulted in unprecedented rates of long-lasting tumor responses in patients with a variety of cancers. This can be achieved by antibodies blocking the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway, either alone or in combination. The main premise for inducing an immune response is the pre-existence of antitumor T cells that were limited by specific immune checkpoints. Most patients who have tumor responses maintain long lasting disease control, yet one third of patients relapse. Mechanisms of acquired resistance are currently poorly understood, but evidence points to alterations that converge on the antigen presentation and interferon gamma signaling pathways. New generation combinatorial therapies may overcome resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

            Enhancing tumor-specific T-cell immunity by inhibiting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-programmed death 1 (PD-1) signaling has shown promise in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Combining checkpoint inhibition with cytotoxic chemotherapy may have a synergistic effect and improve efficacy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Review of Indications of FDA-Approved Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors per NCCN Guidelines with the Level of Evidence

              Cancer is associated with higher morbidity and mortality and is the second leading cause of death in the US. Further, in some nations, cancer has overtaken heart disease as the leading cause of mortality. Identification of molecular mechanisms by which cancerous cells evade T cell-mediated cytotoxic damage has led to the modern era of immunotherapy in cancer treatment. Agents that release these immune brakes have shown activity to recover dysfunctional T cells and regress various cancer. Both cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) play their role as physiologic brakes on unrestrained cytotoxic T effector function. CTLA-4 (CD 152) is a B7/CD28 family; it mediates immunosuppression by indirectly diminishing signaling through the co-stimulatory receptor CD28. Ipilimumab is the first and only FDA-approved CTLA-4 inhibitor; PD-1 is an inhibitory transmembrane protein expressed on T cells, B cells, Natural Killer cells (NKs), and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs). Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed on the surface of multiple tissue types, including many tumor cells and hematopoietic cells. PD-L2 is more restricted to hematopoietic cells. Blockade of the PD-1 /PDL-1 pathway can enhance anti-tumor T cell reactivity and promotes immune control over the cancerous cells. Since the FDA approval of ipilimumab (human IgG1 k anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) in 2011, six more immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for cancer therapy. PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab and PD-L1 inhibitors atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab are in the current list of the approved agents in addition to ipilimumab. In this review paper, we discuss the role of each immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), the landmark trials which led to their FDA approval, and the strength of the evidence per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), which is broadly utilized by medical oncologists and hematologists in their daily practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm
                Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm
                nnn
                NEURIMMINFL
                Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                2332-7812
                January 2023
                29 November 2022
                : 10
                : 1
                : e200058
                Affiliations
                From the Centre National de Référence pour les Syndromes Neurologiques Paranéoplasiques (A.F., M.V.G., N.L.C.-P., A.V., S.M.-C., G.P., V.W., M.D., V.R., B.J., J.H.), Hospices Civils de Lyon, France; MeLiS - UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284 - INSERM U1314 (A.F., M.V.G., N.L.C.-P., A.V., S.M.-C., G.P., V.W., M.D., V.R., B.J., J.H.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France; Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (A.F.), Psicologia, Area del Farmaco e Salute del Bambino, Università di Firenze, Italia; Unité de Neuro Oncologie (L.T.), Département de Neurologie, Hôpital Central, Nancy Cedex, France; Unité mixte de Recherche 7039 CRAN BioSiS CNRS (L.T.), Faculté de Médecine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France; Centre de Référence des Pathologies Neuromusculaires de l’Adulte (Nord-Est-Ile de France) (M.M.), Service de Neurologie, CHU Central Nancy, France; Service de Neurologie (M.L.), CHU Central Caen, France; Service de Neurologie (A.W.), Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France; Service de Neurologie (Z.L.), Centre Hospitalier de Pau, France; Service d'Immunologie (N.F., D.G.), Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre-Bénite, France; and ImmuCare (Immunology Cancer Research) (B.J., J.H.), Institut de Cancérologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Dr. Honnorat jerome.honnorat@ 123456chu-lyon.fr

                Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures. Funding information is provided at the end of the article.

                Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Josep O. Dalmau, MD, PhD, FAAN.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9555-4847
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-7061
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5958-3288
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-920X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-3056
                Article
                NXI-2022-200065
                10.1212/NXI.0000000000200058
                9709718
                36446613
                379af46d-410e-4cf5-9ca7-3545587b7875
                Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 4 July 2022
                : 19 September 2022
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content415

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors609