10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual‐energy CT

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over the past decade, spectral or dual‐energy CT has gained relevancy, especially in oncological radiology. Nonetheless, its use in the radiotherapy (RT) clinic remains limited. This review article aims to give an overview of the current state of spectral CT and to explore opportunities for applications in RT.

          In this article, three groups of benefits of spectral CT over conventional CT in RT are recognized. Firstly, spectral CT provides more information of physical properties of the body, which can improve dose calculation. Furthermore, it improves the visibility of tumors, for a wide variety of malignancies as well as organs‐at‐risk OARs, which could reduce treatment uncertainty. And finally, spectral CT provides quantitative physiological information, which can be used to personalize and quantify treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references234

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications.

          In x-ray computed tomography (CT), materials having different elemental compositions can be represented by identical pixel values on a CT image (ie, CT numbers), depending on the mass density of the material. Thus, the differentiation and classification of different tissue types and contrast agents can be extremely challenging. In dual-energy CT, an additional attenuation measurement is obtained with a second x-ray spectrum (ie, a second "energy"), allowing the differentiation of multiple materials. Alternatively, this allows quantification of the mass density of two or three materials in a mixture with known elemental composition. Recent advances in the use of energy-resolving, photon-counting detectors for CT imaging suggest the ability to acquire data in multiple energy bins, which is expected to further improve the signal-to-noise ratio for material-specific imaging. In this review, the underlying motivation and physical principles of dual- or multi-energy CT are reviewed and each of the current technical approaches is described. In addition, current and evolving clinical applications are introduced.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept

            Highlights • The Elekta Unity MR-linac adaptive radiotherapy concept is explained. • The adapt to shape and adapt to position workflows are compared. • Different methods for dose re-calculation and optimization are discussed. • Full online re-planning is the most robust adaptive planning method for the Unity. • Faster methods are available, but should be dosimetrically explored per use case.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy

              Radiotherapy based on magnetic resonance imaging as the sole modality (MRI-only RT) is an area of growing scientific interest due to the increasing use of MRI for both target and normal tissue delineation and the development of MR based delivery systems. One major issue in MRI-only RT is the assignment of electron densities (ED) to MRI scans for dose calculation and a similar need for attenuation correction can be found for hybrid PET/MR systems. The ED assigned MRI scan is here named a substitute CT (sCT). In this review, we report on a collection of typical performance values for a number of main approaches encountered in the literature for sCT generation as compared to CT. A literature search in the Scopus database resulted in 254 papers which were included in this investigation. A final number of 50 contributions which fulfilled all inclusion criteria were categorized according to applied method, MRI sequence/contrast involved, number of subjects included and anatomical site investigated. The latter included brain, torso, prostate and phantoms. The contributions geometric and/or dosimetric performance metrics were also noted. The majority of studies are carried out on the brain for 5–10 patients with PET/MR applications in mind using a voxel based method. T1 weighted images are most commonly applied. The overall dosimetric agreement is in the order of 0.3–2.5%. A strict gamma criterion of 1% and 1mm has a range of passing rates from 68 to 94% while less strict criteria show pass rates > 98%. The mean absolute error (MAE) is between 80 and 200 HU for the brain and around 40 HU for the prostate. The Dice score for bone is between 0.5 and 0.95. The specificity and sensitivity is reported in the upper 80s% for both quantities and correctly classified voxels average around 84%. The review shows that a variety of promising approaches exist that seem clinical acceptable even with standard clinical MRI sequences. A consistent reference frame for method benchmarking is probably necessary to move the field further towards a widespread clinical implementation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                matthijs.kruis@philips.com
                Journal
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                10.1002/(ISSN)1526-9914
                ACM2
                Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1526-9914
                07 November 2021
                January 2022
                : 23
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/acm2.v23.1 )
                : e13468
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Clinical Science CT Philips Healthcare Best The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence

                Matthijs Ferdinand Kruis, Clinical Science CT, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands. Email: matthijs.kruis@ 123456philips.com

                Article
                ACM213468
                10.1002/acm2.13468
                8803285
                34743405
                37419045-12b5-43c2-8ea9-0b1f9b0cf944
                © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 October 2021
                : 22 June 2022
                : 19 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Pages: 17, Words: 12774
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.0 mode:remove_FC converted:31.01.2022

                conventional ct,dose calculation,dual‐energy ct,material decomposition,proton therapy,quantification,radiotherapy,tumor visibility,spectral ct

                Comments

                Comment on this article