19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of the key characteristics of carcinogens in cancer hazard identification

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Smith et al. (Env. Health Perspect. 124: 713, 2016) identified 10 key characteristics (KCs), one or more of which are commonly exhibited by established human carcinogens. The KCs reflect the properties of a cancer-causing agent, such as ‘is genotoxic,’ ‘is immunosuppressive’ or ‘modulates receptor-mediated effects,’ and are distinct from the hallmarks of cancer, which are the properties of tumors. To assess feasibility and limitations of applying the KCs to diverse agents, methods and results of mechanistic data evaluations were compiled from eight recent IARC Monograph meetings. A systematic search, screening and evaluation procedure identified a broad literature encompassing multiple KCs for most (12/16) IARC Group 1 or 2A carcinogens identified in these meetings. Five carcinogens are genotoxic and induce oxidative stress, of which pentachlorophenol, hydrazine and malathion also showed additional KCs. Four others, including welding fumes, are immunosuppressive. The overall evaluation was upgraded to Group 2A based on mechanistic data for only two agents, tetrabromobisphenol A and tetrachloroazobenzene. Both carcinogens modulate receptor-mediated effects in combination with other KCs. Fewer studies were identified for Group 2B or 3 agents, with the vast majority (17/18) showing only one or no KCs. Thus, an objective approach to identify and evaluate mechanistic studies pertinent to cancer revealed strong evidence for multiple KCs for most Group 1 or 2A carcinogens but also identified opportunities for improvement. Further development and mapping of toxicological and biomarker endpoints and pathways relevant to the KCs can advance the systematic search and evaluation of mechanistic data in carcinogen hazard identification.

          Abstract

          The use of the KCs of carcinogens provides an objective approach to identify and evaluate mechanistic studies pertinent to cancer induction. Analysis of data from eight recent IARC Monograph meetings revealed strong evidence for multiple KCs for most Group 1 or 2A known and probable human carcinogens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

          Ecological risk assessors face increasing demands to assess more chemicals, with greater speed and accuracy, and to do so using fewer resources and experimental animals. New approaches in biological and computational sciences may be able to generate mechanistic information that could help in meeting these challenges. However, to use mechanistic data to support chemical assessments, there is a need for effective translation of this information into endpoints meaningful to ecological risk-effects on survival, development, and reproduction in individual organisms and, by extension, impacts on populations. Here we discuss a framework designed for this purpose, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP). An AOP is a conceptual construct that portrays existing knowledge concerning the linkage between a direct molecular initiating event and an adverse outcome at a biological level of organization relevant to risk assessment. The practical utility of AOPs for ecological risk assessment of chemicals is illustrated using five case examples. The examples demonstrate how the AOP concept can focus toxicity testing in terms of species and endpoint selection, enhance across-chemical extrapolation, and support prediction of mixture effects. The examples also show how AOPs facilitate use of molecular or biochemical endpoints (sometimes referred to as biomarkers) for forecasting chemical impacts on individuals and populations. In the concluding sections of the paper, we discuss how AOPs can help to guide research that supports chemical risk assessments and advocate for the incorporation of this approach into a broader systems biology framework.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Update on EPA's ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management.

              The field of toxicology is on the cusp of a major transformation in how the safety and hazard of chemicals are evaluated for potential effects on human health and the environment. Brought on by the recognition of the limitations of the current paradigm in terms of cost, time, and throughput, combined with the ever increasing power of modern biological tools to probe mechanisms of chemical-biological interactions at finer and finer resolutions, 21st century toxicology is rapidly taking shape. A key element of the new approach is a focus on the molecular and cellular pathways that are the targets of chemical interactions. By understanding toxicity in this manner, we begin to learn how chemicals cause toxicity, as opposed to merely what diseases or health effects they might cause. This deeper understanding leads to increasing confidence in identifying which populations might be at risk, significant susceptibility factors, and key influences on the shape of the dose-response curve. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated the ToxCast, or "toxicity forecaster", program 5 years ago to gain understanding of the strengths and limitations of the new approach by starting to test relatively large numbers (hundreds) of chemicals against an equally large number of biological assays. Using computational approaches, the EPA is building decision support tools based on ToxCast in vitro screening results to help prioritize chemicals for further investigation, as well as developing predictive models for a number of health outcomes. This perspective provides a summary of the initial, proof of concept, Phase I of ToxCast that has laid the groundwork for the next phases and future directions of the program.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Carcinogenesis
                Carcinogenesis
                carcin
                Carcinogenesis
                Oxford University Press (UK )
                0143-3334
                1460-2180
                April 2018
                21 February 2018
                21 February 2018
                : 39
                : 4
                : 614-622
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Monographs Programme, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
                [2 ]Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
                [3 ]ENVT, INRA TOXALIM (Research Center in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
                [4 ]Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA
                [6 ]Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [8 ]Division of Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR, USA
                [9 ]Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
                Author notes
                To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 510 642 8770; Fax: +1 510 642 0427; Email: martynts@ 123456berkeley.edu .
                Article
                bgy031
                10.1093/carcin/bgy031
                5888955
                29562322
                36e65225-c6af-4cac-a685-6a1714ababbd
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 23 November 2017
                : 20 February 2018
                : 09 February 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: U01 CA33193
                Award ID: P42ES004705
                Funded by: European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation
                Categories
                Carcinogenesis

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article