A unique high-diversity natural product collection as a reservoir of new therapeutic leads

Author(s): Francesca Ghirga ¹ ^, ² ^, ³ ^, ⁴ , Deborah Quaglio ⁵ ^, ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁴ , Mattia Mori ⁹ ^, ¹⁰ ^, ⁶ ^, ¹¹ ^, ¹² , Silvia Cammarone ⁵ ^, ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁴ , Antonia Iazzetti ⁵ ^, ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁴ , Antonella Goggiamani ⁵ ^, ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁴ , Cinzia Ingallina ⁵ ^, ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁴ , Bruno Botta ⁵ ^, ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁴ , Andrea Calcaterra ⁵ ^, ⁶ ^, ⁷ ^, ⁸ ^, ⁴

Publication date (Electronic): 2021

Journal: Organic Chemistry Frontiers

Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

We review the successful application of computer-aided methods to screen a unique and high-diversity in house collection library composed of around 1000 individual natural products.

Abstract

Plants represent a rich source of structurally diverse secondary metabolites, which can be exploited in the development of new clinically important compounds. Indeed, due to their biodiversity, medicinal plants represent the largest library of compounds that has ever existed. To date less than 1% of this vast biodiversity has been exploited in drug discovery, due to several factors, including the lack of an appropriate multidisciplinary perspective. Here we review the successful application of computer-aided methods in screening a unique and high-diversity in house collection library composed of around 1000 individual natural products, isolated mainly from indigenous plants collected in biodiversity-rich countries, especially of the tropics and subtropics, and enlarged with their semi-synthetic and synthetic derivatives, as well as plant material extracts, up to around 2000 components. During the last ten years, the in house library has provided several lead compounds that have been developed, and in some cases patented, as anticancer and antimicrobial agents. The main classes of the library are described, including (but not limited to) alkaloids, terpenoids, Diels–Alder-type adducts, isoflavones, chalcones, and cannabinoids. The main focus is on the chemical characteristics and biological activity of these identified compounds, with particular attention being given to those currently under patent or in the preclinical phase. We also assess the use of computer-aided methods in screening this unique and diverse in house collection of natural products that, over the last ten years, has provided some lead compounds that have been developed, and in some cases patented, as anticancer and antimicrobial agents. Finally, this review highlights the potential use of plant food extracts as a source of nutraceuticals and functional foods. The multidisciplinary approach described herein may further motivate research groups involved in natural product chemistry to potentially benefit from a limitless source of novel bioactive compounds.

Related collections

Most cited references 166

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019

David J Newman, Gordon M. Cragg (2020)

This review is an updated and expanded version of the five prior reviews that were published in this journal in 1997, 2003, 2007, 2012, and 2016. For all approved therapeutic agents, the time frame has been extended to cover the almost 39 years from the first of January 1981 to the 30th of September 2019 for all diseases worldwide and from ∼1946 (earliest so far identified) to the 30th of September 2019 for all approved antitumor drugs worldwide. As in earlier reviews, only the first approval of any drug is counted, irrespective of how many "biosimilars" or added approvals were subsequently identified. As in the 2012 and 2016 reviews, we have continued to utilize our secondary subdivision of a "natural product mimic", or "NM", to join the original primary divisions, and the designation "natural product botanical", or "NB", to cover those botanical "defined mixtures" now recognized as drug entities by the FDA (and similar organizations). From the data presented in this review, the utilization of natural products and/or synthetic variations using their novel structures, in order to discover and develop the final drug entity, is still alive and well. For example, in the area of cancer, over the time frame from 1946 to 1980, of the 75 small molecules, 40, or 53.3%, are N or ND. In the 1981 to date time frame the equivalent figures for the N* compounds of the 185 small molecules are 62, or 33.5%, though to these can be added the 58 S* and S*/NMs, bringing the figure to 64.9%. In other areas, the influence of natural product structures is quite marked with, as expected from prior information, the anti-infective area being dependent on natural products and their structures, though as can be seen in the review there are still disease areas (shown in Table 2) for which there are no drugs derived from natural products. Although combinatorial chemistry techniques have succeeded as methods of optimizing structures and have been used very successfully in the optimization of many recently approved agents, we are still able to identify only two de novo combinatorial compounds (one of which is a little speculative) approved as drugs in this 39-year time frame, though there is also one drug that was developed using the "fragment-binding methodology" and approved in 2012. We have also added a discussion of candidate drug entities currently in clinical trials as "warheads" and some very interesting preliminary reports on sources of novel antibiotics from Nature due to the absolute requirement for new agents to combat plasmid-borne resistance genes now in the general populace. We continue to draw the attention of readers to the recognition that a significant number of natural product drugs/leads are actually produced by microbes and/or microbial interactions with the "host from whence it was isolated"; thus we consider that this area of natural product research should be expanded significantly.

0 comments Cited 1182 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014.

David J Newman, Gordon M. Cragg (2016)

This contribution is a completely updated and expanded version of the four prior analogous reviews that were published in this journal in 1997, 2003, 2007, and 2012. In the case of all approved therapeutic agents, the time frame has been extended to cover the 34 years from January 1, 1981, to December 31, 2014, for all diseases worldwide, and from 1950 (earliest so far identified) to December 2014 for all approved antitumor drugs worldwide. As mentioned in the 2012 review, we have continued to utilize our secondary subdivision of a "natural product mimic", or "NM", to join the original primary divisions and the designation "natural product botanical", or "NB", to cover those botanical "defined mixtures" now recognized as drug entities by the U.S. FDA (and similar organizations). From the data presented in this review, the utilization of natural products and/or their novel structures, in order to discover and develop the final drug entity, is still alive and well. For example, in the area of cancer, over the time frame from around the 1940s to the end of 2014, of the 175 small molecules approved, 131, or 75%, are other than "S" (synthetic), with 85, or 49%, actually being either natural products or directly derived therefrom. In other areas, the influence of natural product structures is quite marked, with, as expected from prior information, the anti-infective area being dependent on natural products and their structures. We wish to draw the attention of readers to the rapidly evolving recognition that a significant number of natural product drugs/leads are actually produced by microbes and/or microbial interactions with the "host from whence it was isolated", and therefore it is considered that this area of natural product research should be expanded significantly.

0 comments Cited 875 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era.

Alan L Harvey, RuAngelie Edrada-Ebel, Ronald J Quinn (2015)

Natural products have been a rich source of compounds for drug discovery. However, their use has diminished in the past two decades, in part because of technical barriers to screening natural products in high-throughput assays against molecular targets. Here, we review strategies for natural product screening that harness the recent technical advances that have reduced these barriers. We also assess the use of genomic and metabolomic approaches to augment traditional methods of studying natural products, and highlight recent examples of natural products in antimicrobial drug discovery and as inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. The growing appreciation of functional assays and phenotypic screens may further contribute to a revival of interest in natural products for drug discovery.