Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical implementation of an electron monitor unit dosimetry system based on task group 71 report and a commercial calculation program

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many clinics still use monitor unit (MU) calculations for electron treatment planning and/or quality assurance (QA). This work (1) investigates the clinical implementation of a dosimetry system including a modified American Association of Physicists in Medicine-task group-71 (TG-71)-based electron MU calculation protocol (modified TG-71 electron [mTG-71E] and an independent commercial calculation program and (2) provides the practice recommendations for clinical usage. Following the recently published TG-71 guidance, an organized mTG-71E databook was developed to facilitate data access and subsequent MU computation according to our clinical need. A recently released commercial secondary calculation program – Mobius3D (version 1.5.1) Electron Quick Calc (EQC) (Mobius Medical System, LP, Houston, TX, USA), with inherent pencil beam algorithm and independent beam data, was used to corroborate the calculation results. For various setups, the calculation consistency and accuracy of mTG-71E and EQC were validated by their cross-comparison and the ion chamber measurements in a solid water phantom. Our results show good agreement between mTG-71E and EQC calculations, with average 2% difference. Both mTG-71E and EQC calculations match with measurements within 3%. In general, these differences increase with decreased cutout size, increased extended source to surface distance, and lower energy. It is feasible to use TG71 and Mobius3D clinically as primary and secondary electron MU calculations or vice versa. We recommend a practice that only requires patient-specific measurements in rare cases when mTG-71E and EQC calculations differ by 5% or more.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Commissioning of the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator: a multi-institutional study.

          Latest generation linear accelerators (linacs), i.e., TrueBeam (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and its stereotactic counterpart, TrueBeam STx, have several unique features, including high-dose-rate flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon modes, reengineered electron modes with new scattering foil geometries, updated imaging hardware/software, and a novel control system. An evaluation of five TrueBeam linacs at three different institutions has been performed and this work reports on the commissioning experience.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical electron-beam dosimetry: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 25.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Commissioning and dosimetric characteristics of TrueBeam system: composite data of three TrueBeam machines.

              A TrueBeam linear accelerator (TB-LINAC) is designed to deliver traditionally flattened and flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. Although it has been widely adopted in many clinics for patient treatment, limited information is available related to commissioning of this type of machine. In this work, commissioning data of three units were measured, and multiunit comparison was presented to provide valuable insights and reliable evaluations on the characteristics of the new treatment system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Phys
                J Med Phys
                JMP
                Journal of Medical Physics
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0971-6203
                1998-3913
                Oct-Dec 2016
                : 41
                : 4
                : 214-218
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [1 ]Radiation Oncology Center, Good Sam Hospital, MedStar RadAmerica, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [2 ]Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Huijun Xu, Central Maryland Radiation Oncology Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 10710 Charter Drive, Suite G030, Columbia, MD 21044, USA. E-mail: hxu@ 123456umm.edu
                Article
                JMP-41-214
                10.4103/0971-6203.195184
                5228043
                369c6a73-e506-4037-bfe8-6b35fe059265
                Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Medical Physics

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 19 May 2016
                : 23 August 2016
                : 23 August 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                Medical physics
                electron monitor unit calculation,mobius3d electron quick calc,task group 71

                Comments

                Comment on this article