20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Psychological factors shaping public responses to COVID-19 digital contact tracing technologies in Germany.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic has seen one of the first large-scale uses of digital contact tracing to track a chain of infection and contain the spread of a virus. The new technology has posed challenges both for governments aiming at high and effective uptake and for citizens weighing its benefits (e.g., protecting others' health) against the potential risks (e.g., loss of data privacy). Our cross-sectional survey with repeated measures across four samples in Germany ([Formula: see text]) focused on psychological factors contributing to the public adoption of digital contact tracing. We found that public acceptance of privacy-encroaching measures (e.g., granting the government emergency access to people's medical records or location tracking data) decreased over the course of the pandemic. Intentions to use contact tracing apps-hypothetical ones or the Corona-Warn-App launched in Germany in June 2020-were high. Users and non-users of the Corona-Warn-App differed in their assessment of its risks and benefits, in their knowledge of the underlying technology, and in their reasons to download or not to download the app. Trust in the app's perceived security and belief in its effectiveness emerged as psychological factors playing a key role in its adoption. We incorporate our findings into a behavioral framework for digital contact tracing and provide policy recommendations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Sci Rep
          Scientific reports
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          2045-2322
          2045-2322
          Sep 21 2021
          : 11
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. kozyreva@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.
          [2 ] Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
          [3 ] School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
          [4 ] School of Psychological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
          [5 ] Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
          Article
          10.1038/s41598-021-98249-5
          10.1038/s41598-021-98249-5
          8455538
          34548550
          36904f2c-7c90-460b-bc03-34ef94d3f13c
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article