0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A framework for detecting causal effects of risk factors at an individual level based on principles of Mendelian randomisation: applications to modelling individualised effects of lipids on coronary artery disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Mendelian Randomisation (MR) has been widely used to study the causal effects of risk factors. However, almost all MR studies concentrate on the population's average causal effects. With the advent of precision medicine, the individualised treatment effect (ITE) is often of greater interest. For instance, certain risk factors may pose a higher risk to some individuals than others, and the benefits of treatments may vary across individuals. This study proposes a framework for estimating individualised causal effects in large-scale observational studies where unobserved confounding factors may be present.

          Methods

          We propose a framework (MR-ITE) that expands the scope of MR from estimating average causal effects to individualised causal effects. We present several approaches for estimating ITEs within this MR framework, primarily grounded on the principles of the “R-learner”. To evaluate the presence of causal effect heterogeneity, we also proposed two permutation testing methods. We employed polygenic risk score (PRS) as instruments and proposed methods to improve the accuracy of ITE estimates by removal of potentially pleiotropic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The validity of our approach was substantiated through comprehensive simulations. The proposed framework also allows the identification of important effect modifiers contributing to individualised differences in treatment effects. We applied our framework to study the individualised causal effects of various lipid traits, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC), on the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) based on the UK-Biobank (UKBB). We also studied the ITE of C-reactive protein (CRP) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) on CAD as secondary analyses.

          Findings

          Simulation studies demonstrated that MR-ITE outperformed traditional causal forest approaches in identifying ITEs when unobserved confounders were present. The integration of the contamination mixture (ConMix) approach to remove invalid pleiotropic SNPs further enhanced MR-ITE's performance. In real-world applications, we identified positive causal associations between CAD and several factors (LDL-C, Total Cholesterol, and IGF-1 levels). Our permutation tests revealed significant heterogeneity in these causal associations across individuals. Using Shapley value analysis, we identified the top effect modifiers contributing to this heterogeneity.

          Interpretation

          We introduced a new framework, MR-ITE, capable of inferring individualised causal effects in observational studies based on the MR approach, utilizing PRS as instruments. MR-ITE extends the application of MR from estimating the average treatment effect to individualised treatment effects. Our real-world application of MR-ITE underscores the importance of identifying ITEs in the context of precision medicine.

          Funding

          This work was supported partially by a doi 10.13039/501100001809, National Natural Science Foundation of China; grant (NSFC; grant number 81971706), the KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research of Common Diseases, doi 10.13039/501100011191, Kunming Institute of Zoology; and doi 10.13039/501100004853, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; , China, and the Lo Kwee Seong Biomedical Research Fund from doi 10.13039/501100004853, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; .

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians

          Mendelian randomisation uses genetic variation as a natural experiment to investigate the causal relations between potentially modifiable risk factors and health outcomes in observational data. As with all epidemiological approaches, findings from Mendelian randomisation studies depend on specific assumptions. We provide explanations of the information typically reported in Mendelian randomisation studies that can be used to assess the plausibility of these assumptions and guidance on how to interpret findings from Mendelian randomisation studies in the context of other sources of evidence
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology.

            Observational epidemiological studies suffer from many potential biases, from confounding and from reverse causation, and this limits their ability to robustly identify causal associations. Several high-profile situations exist in which randomized controlled trials of precisely the same intervention that has been examined in observational studies have produced markedly different findings. In other observational sciences, the use of instrumental variable (IV) approaches has been one approach to strengthening causal inferences in non-experimental situations. The use of germline genetic variants that proxy for environmentally modifiable exposures as instruments for these exposures is one form of IV analysis that can be implemented within observational epidemiological studies. The method has been referred to as 'Mendelian randomization', and can be considered as analogous to randomized controlled trials. This paper outlines Mendelian randomization, draws parallels with IV methods, provides examples of implementation of the approach and discusses limitations of the approach and some methods for dealing with these.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel

              Abstract Aims To appraise the clinical and genetic evidence that low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods and results We assessed whether the association between LDL and ASCVD fulfils the criteria for causality by evaluating the totality of evidence from genetic studies, prospective epidemiologic cohort studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and randomized trials of LDL-lowering therapies. In clinical studies, plasma LDL burden is usually estimated by determination of plasma LDL cholesterol level (LDL-C). Rare genetic mutations that cause reduced LDL receptor function lead to markedly higher LDL-C and a dose-dependent increase in the risk of ASCVD, whereas rare variants leading to lower LDL-C are associated with a correspondingly lower risk of ASCVD. Separate meta-analyses of over 200 prospective cohort studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and randomized trials including more than 2 million participants with over 20 million person-years of follow-up and over 150 000 cardiovascular events demonstrate a remarkably consistent dose-dependent log-linear association between the absolute magnitude of exposure of the vasculature to LDL-C and the risk of ASCVD; and this effect appears to increase with increasing duration of exposure to LDL-C. Both the naturally randomized genetic studies and the randomized intervention trials consistently demonstrate that any mechanism of lowering plasma LDL particle concentration should reduce the risk of ASCVD events proportional to the absolute reduction in LDL-C and the cumulative duration of exposure to lower LDL-C, provided that the achieved reduction in LDL-C is concordant with the reduction in LDL particle number and that there are no competing deleterious off-target effects. Conclusion Consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocally establishes that LDL causes ASCVD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                eBioMedicine
                EBioMedicine
                eBioMedicine
                Elsevier
                2352-3964
                28 February 2025
                March 2025
                28 February 2025
                : 113
                : 105616
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
                [b ]KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research of Common Diseases, Kunming Institute of Zoology and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, China
                [c ]Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
                [d ]CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China
                [e ]Margaret K.L. Cheung Research Centre for Management of Parkinsonism, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
                [f ]Brain and Mind Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
                [g ]Hong Kong Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
                [h ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China. hcso@ 123456cuhk.edu.hk
                Article
                S2352-3964(25)00060-X 105616
                10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105616
                11919333
                40020258
                36815881-652f-4efb-8ccd-d3e8c3b0f7f6
                © 2025 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 May 2024
                : 30 January 2025
                : 10 February 2025
                Categories
                Articles

                mendelian randomisation,individualised treatment effect,causal inference,heterogeneity,coronary artery disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article