17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Γ-secretase modulators do not induce Aβ-rebound and accumulation of β-C-terminal fragment.

      Journal of Neurochemistry
      Alanine, analogs & derivatives, pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases, antagonists & inhibitors, drug effects, Amyloid beta-Peptides, biosynthesis, genetics, Animals, Area Under Curve, Azepines, Cell Line, Cells, Cultured, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Male, Mice, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, pathology, Peptide Fragments, metabolism, Plaque, Amyloid, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Notch, Signal Transduction

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) have been developed to reduce amyloid-β (Aβ) production for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease by inhibiting the cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP). However, cross-inhibitory activity on the processing of Notch can cause adverse reactions. To avoid these undesirable effects, γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) are being developed to selectively reduce toxic Aβ production without perturbing Notch signaling. As it is also known that GSIs can cause a paradoxical increase of plasma Aβ over the baseline after a transient reduction (known as Aβ-rebound), we asked if GSMs would cause a similar rebound and what the potential mechanism might be. Our studies were performed with one GSI (LY-450139) and two chemically distinct GSMs. Although LY-450139 caused Aβ-rebound as expected in rat plasma, the two GSMs did not. Inhibition of APP processing by LY-450139 induced an accumulation of γ-secretase substrates, α- and β-C-terminal fragments of APP, but neither GSM caused such an accumulation. In conclusion, we discover that GSMs, unlike GSIs, do not cause Aβ-rebound, possibly because of the lack of accumulation of β-C-terminal fragments. GSMs may be superior to GSIs in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease not only by sparing Notch signaling but also by avoiding Aβ-rebound. © 2011 GlaxoSmithKline. Journal of Neurochemistry © 2011 International Society for Neurochemistry.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article