7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impacts of coprophagic foraging behaviour on the avian gut microbiome

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Avian gut microbial communities are complex and play a fundamental role in regulating biological functions within an individual. Although it is well established that diet can influence the structure and composition of the gut microbiota, foraging behaviour may also play a critical, yet unexplored role in shaping the composition, dynamics, and adaptive potential of avian gut microbiota. In this review, we examine the potential influence of coprophagic foraging behaviour on the establishment and adaptability of wild avian gut microbiomes. Coprophagy involves the ingestion of faeces, sourced from either self (autocoprophagy), conspecific animals (allocoprophagy), or heterospecific animals. Much like faecal transplant therapy, coprophagy may ( i) support the establishment of the gut microbiota of young precocial species, ( ii) directly and indirectly provide nutritional and energetic requirements, and ( iii) represent a mechanism by which birds can rapidly adapt the microbiota to changing environments and diets. However, in certain contexts, coprophagy may also pose risks to wild birds, and their microbiomes, through increased exposure to chemical pollutants, pathogenic microbes, and antibiotic‐resistant microbes, with deleterious effects on host health and performance. Given the potentially far‐reaching consequences of coprophagy for avian microbiomes, and the dearth of literature directly investigating these links, we have developed a predictive framework for directing future research to understand better when and why wild birds engage in distinct types of coprophagy, and the consequences of this foraging behaviour. There is a need for comprehensive investigation into the influence of coprophagy on avian gut microbiotas and its effects on host health and performance throughout ontogeny and across a range of environmental perturbations. Future behavioural studies combined with metagenomic approaches are needed to provide insights into the function of this poorly understood behaviour.

          Related collections

          Most cited references199

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes.

          Diet strongly affects human health, partly by modulating gut microbiome composition. We used diet inventories and 16S rDNA sequencing to characterize fecal samples from 98 individuals. Fecal communities clustered into enterotypes distinguished primarily by levels of Bacteroides and Prevotella. Enterotypes were strongly associated with long-term diets, particularly protein and animal fat (Bacteroides) versus carbohydrates (Prevotella). A controlled-feeding study of 10 subjects showed that microbiome composition changed detectably within 24 hours of initiating a high-fat/low-fiber or low-fat/high-fiber diet, but that enterotype identity remained stable during the 10-day study. Thus, alternative enterotype states are associated with long-term diet.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance.

            Emergence of resistance among the most important bacterial pathogens is recognized as a major public health threat affecting humans worldwide. Multidrug-resistant organisms have not only emerged in the hospital environment but are now often identified in community settings, suggesting that reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant bacteria are present outside the hospital. The bacterial response to the antibiotic "attack" is the prime example of bacterial adaptation and the pinnacle of evolution. "Survival of the fittest" is a consequence of an immense genetic plasticity of bacterial pathogens that trigger specific responses that result in mutational adaptations, acquisition of genetic material, or alteration of gene expression producing resistance to virtually all antibiotics currently available in clinical practice. Therefore, understanding the biochemical and genetic basis of resistance is of paramount importance to design strategies to curtail the emergence and spread of resistance and to devise innovative therapeutic approaches against multidrug-resistant organisms. In this chapter, we will describe in detail the major mechanisms of antibiotic resistance encountered in clinical practice, providing specific examples in relevant bacterial pathogens.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Human placenta has no microbiome but can harbour potential pathogens

              We sought to determine whether preeclampsia, delivery of a small for gestational age infant or spontaneous preterm birth were associated with the presence of bacterial DNA in the human placenta. Here we show that there was no evidence for the presence of bacteria in the large majority of placental samples, from both complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies. Almost all signals were related either to acquisition of bacteria during labour and delivery or contamination of laboratory reagents with bacterial DNA. The exception was Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus), where non-contaminant signals were detected in ~5% of samples collected prior to the onset of labour. We conclude that bacterial infection of the placenta is not a common cause of adverse pregnancy outcome and that the human placenta does not have a microbiome, but it does represent a potential site of perinatal acquisition of S. agalactiae, a major cause of neonatal sepsis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Biological Reviews
                Biological Reviews
                Wiley
                1464-7931
                1469-185X
                April 2024
                December 08 2023
                April 2024
                : 99
                : 2
                : 582-597
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Future Industries Institute (FII) University of South Australia Mawson Lakes Campus, GPO Box 2471 5095 Adelaide South Australia Australia
                [2 ] UniSA STEM, University of South Australia GPO Box 2471 Adelaide South Australia 5001 Australia
                [3 ] Australian Institute for Microbiology and Infection University of Technology Sydney PO Box 123 Ultimo New South Wales 2007 Australia
                [4 ] Australian Centre for Genomic Epidemiological Microbiology University of Technology Sydney PO Box 123 Ultimo New South Wales 2007 Australia
                [5 ] Cooperative Research Centre for Solving Antimicrobial Resistance in Agribusiness, Food, and Environments (CRC SAAFE) University of South Australia GPO Box 2471 5095 Adelaide South Australia Australia
                [6 ] School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales 2522 Australia
                Article
                10.1111/brv.13036
                363ec31e-3e54-416e-8b28-4cab93b96ae9
                © 2024

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article