2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Preferential formation of MT1/MT2 melatonin receptor heterodimers with distinct ligand interaction properties compared with MT2 homodimers.

      Molecular pharmacology
      American Society for Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics (ASPET)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Heterodimerization has been documented for several members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, including the closely related MT(1) and MT(2) melatonin receptors. However, the relative abundance of hetero-versus homodimers and the specific properties, which can be attributed to each form, are difficult to determine. Using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) donor saturation assay, we show that half-maximal MT(1)/MT(2) heterodimer formation is reached for expression levels as low as approximately 4000 receptors per cell. The relative propensity of MT(1) homodimer and MT(1)/MT(2) heterodimer formation are similar, whereas that for the MT(2) homodimer formation is 3- to 4-fold lower. These data indicate that both the relative expression level of each receptor isoform and the affinities between monomers may determine the actual proportion of homo- and heterodimers. The specific interaction of ligands with the MT(1)/MT(2) heterodimer was studied using a BRET-based assay as a readout for the conformational changes of the heterodimer. An MT(1)/MT(2) heterodimer-specific profile and ligands selective for the MT(1)/MT(2) heterodimer compared with the MT(2) homodimer could be identified. Classic radioligand binding and BRET studies suggest that heterodimers contain two functional ligand binding sites that maintain their respective selectivity for MT(1) and MT(2) ligands. Occupation of either binding site is sufficient to induce a conformational change within the heterodimer. Taken together, these results show that the probability of GPCR heterodimer formation may be equal to or even higher than that of the corresponding homodimers and that specific properties of heterodimers can be revealed using a BRET-based ligand/receptor interaction assay.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          15266022
          10.1124/mol.104.000398

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_