7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between Caucasian and Chinese healthy subjects with regards to Corvis ST dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs).

          Methods

          Two thousand eight hundred and eighty-nine healthy Caucasian and Chinese subjects were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Subsequently, Chinese eyes were matched to Caucasians by age, intraocular pressure (IOP), and Corneal Thickness (CCT) using a case-control matching algorithm. The DCRs assessed were Deformation Amplitude (DA) Applanation 1 velocity (A1v), integrated radius (1/R), deformation amplitude ratio (DAratio), stiffness parameter at applanation 1 (SPA1), ARTh (Ambrósio's Relational Thickness to the horizontal profile), and the novel Stress Strain Index (SSI).

          Results

          After age-, CCT-, and IOP- matching, 503 Chinese were assigned to 452 Caucasians participants. Statistical analysis showed a statistical significant difference between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy subjects in the values of SPA1 ( p = 0.008), Arth ( p = 0.008), and SSI ( p < 0.001). Conversely, DA, A1v, DAratio, and 1/R were not significantly different between the two ethnical groups ( p > 0.05).

          Conclusion

          We found significant differences in the values of the DCRs provided by the Corvis ST between Chinese and Caucasian healthy subjects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

          David Luce (2005)
          To study the results of an ocular response analyzer (ORA) to determine the biomechanical properties of the cornea and their relationship to intraocular pressure (IOP). Reichert Inc., Depew, New York, USA. The ORA (Reichert) makes 2 essentially instantaneous applanation measurements that permit determination of corneal and IOP effects. Measurements of several populations indicate that corneal hysteresis, a biomechanical measure, varied over a dynamic range of 1.8 to 14.6 mm Hg and was only weakly correlated with corneal thickness (r(2)=0.12); this is related to the observation that some subjects with relatively thick corneas have less-than-average corneal hysteresis. Corneal hysteresis changes diurnally, presumably as a result of hydration changes. Keratoconus, Fuchs' dystrophy, and post-LASIK patients demonstrated low corneal hysteresis. The corneal hysteresis biomechanical measure may prove valuable for qualification and predictions of outcomes of refractive surgery and in other cases in which corneal biomechanics are important.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.

            To evaluate the ability of a new combined biomechanical index called the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) based on corneal thickness profile and deformation parameters to separate normal from keratoconic patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection.

              To present the Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI), which combines Scheimpflugbased corneal tomography and biomechanics for enhancing ectasia detection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front. Med.
                Frontiers in Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-858X
                25 February 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 834663
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Humanitas San Pio X Hospital , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus , Dresden, Germany
                [3] 3Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital , Tianjin, China
                [4] 4Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University , Tianjin, China
                [5] 5Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Lab, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China
                [6] 6EYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University , Shanghai, China
                [7] 7BAI JI Ophthalmology , Chongqing, China
                [8] 8Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou, China
                [9] 9Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University , Zhejiang, China
                [10] 10Shenyang Aier Eye Hospital , Shenyang, China
                [11] 11Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Milan, Italy
                [12] 12IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital , Rozzano, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jorge L. Alió Del Barrio, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Spain

                Reviewed by: Mo Ziaei, The University of Auckland, New Zealand; Alessandro Arrigo, San Raffaele Hospital (IRCCS), Italy

                *Correspondence: Riccardo Vinciguerra vinciguerra.riccardo@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Ophthalmology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine

                Article
                10.3389/fmed.2022.834663
                8914014
                35280913
                3623d859-10f7-4735-b611-9583ffe2a683
                Copyright © 2022 Vinciguerra, Herber, Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Bai, Yu, Chen, Fang, Raiskup and Vinciguerra.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 December 2021
                : 31 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 31, Pages: 6, Words: 3178
                Categories
                Medicine
                Original Research

                biomechanics,cornea,keratoconus,cbi,iop (intraocular pressure)

                Comments

                Comment on this article