1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A machine learning approach to quantify individual gait responses to ankle exoskeletons.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Predicting an individual's response to an exoskeleton and understanding what data are needed to characterize responses remains challenging. Specifically, we lack a theoretical framework capable of quantifying heterogeneous responses to exoskeleton interventions. We leverage a neural network-based discrepancy modeling framework to quantify complex changes in gait in response to passive ankle exoskeletons in nondisabled adults. Discrepancy modeling aims to resolve dynamical inconsistencies between model predictions and real-world measurements. Neural networks identified models of (i) Nominal gait, (ii) Exoskeleton (Exo) gait, and (iii) the Discrepancy (i.e., response) between them. If an Augmented (Nominal+Discrepancy) model captured exoskeleton responses, its predictions should account for comparable amounts of variance in Exo gait data as the Exo model. Discrepancy modeling successfully quantified individuals' exoskeleton responses without requiring knowledge about physiological structure or motor control: a model of Nominal gait augmented with a Discrepancy model of response accounted for significantly more variance in Exo gait (median R2 for kinematics (0.928-0.963) and electromyography (0.665-0.788), (p<0.042)) than the Nominal model (median R2 for kinematics (0.863-0.939) and electromyography (0.516-0.664)). However, additional measurement modalities and/or improved resolution are needed to characterize Exo gait, as the discrepancy may not comprehensively capture response due to unexplained variance in Exo gait (median R2 for kinematics (0.954-0.977) and electromyography (0.724-0.815)). These techniques can be used to accelerate the discovery of individual-specific mechanisms driving exoskeleton responses, thus enabling personalized rehabilitation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Biomech
          Journal of biomechanics
          Elsevier BV
          1873-2380
          0021-9290
          Aug 2023
          : 157
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. Electronic address: mebers@uw.edu.
          [2 ] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
          [3 ] Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
          [4 ] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
          Article
          S0021-9290(23)00264-6
          10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111695
          37406604
          361819a7-ec46-43c8-83aa-0c28a8acf68b
          History

          Discrepancy modeling,Prediction,Machine learning,Gait,Ankle exoskeleton

          Comments

          Comment on this article