19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determinants promoting and hindering physical activity in primary school children in Germany: a qualitative study with students, teachers and parents

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Determinants affecting children’s physical activity (PA) at an early age are of particular interest to develop and strengthen strategies for increasing the levels of children’s PA. A qualitative study was conducted to investigate the views of primary school-aged children, their teachers and parents regarding barriers and facilitators to engage in PA.

          Methods

          Focus groups were conducted separately with primary school children, parents and teachers in a city in Northern Germany between October 2021 and January 2022. The semi- structured focus groups with children and teachers took part in person within school, whereas the focus groups with parents took place online. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. During analysis, the socio-ecological model was identified as useful to map the determinants mentioned and was consequently applied to organize the data.

          Results

          Teachers ( n = 10), parents ( n = 18) and children ( n = 46) of five primary schools in Germany participated in the focus groups. Participants of the three groups identified similar barriers and facilitators of PA in primary school-aged children, ranging across all four layers of the socio-ecological model. The barriers encountered were the preferences of children for sedentary activities (individual characteristics), the preference of parents to control their child’s actions (microsystem), a lack of financial resources from parents and long sitting times in class (mesosystem), and barriers related to rainy weather and Covid-19 restrictions (exosystem). Facilitators mentioned were the childrens’ natural tendency to be active (individual characteristics), involvement and co-participation of parents or peers in engaging in PA, support provided by teachers and the school (microsystem), living in rural areas, having sufficient facilities and favorable weather conditions (exosystem).

          Conclusion

          A range of determinants promoting and hindering PA, ranging across all layers of the socio-ecological model were identified by children, parents and teachers in this study. These determinants need to be kept in mind when developing effective PA intervention programs for primary school-aged children. Future interventions should go beyond individual characteristics to also acknowledge the influence of childrens’ social surrounding, including parents, peers and teachers, and the wider (school) environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

          Objectives To describe new WHO 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Methods The guidelines were developed in accordance with WHO protocols. An expert Guideline Development Group reviewed evidence to assess associations between physical activity and sedentary behaviour for an agreed set of health outcomes and population groups. The assessment used and systematically updated recent relevant systematic reviews; new primary reviews addressed additional health outcomes or subpopulations. Results The new guidelines address children, adolescents, adults, older adults and include new specific recommendations for pregnant and postpartum women and people living with chronic conditions or disability. All adults should undertake 150–300 min of moderate-intensity, or 75–150 min of vigorous-intensity physical activity, or some equivalent combination of moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity, per week. Among children and adolescents, an average of 60 min/day of moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic physical activity across the week provides health benefits. The guidelines recommend regular muscle-strengthening activity for all age groups. Additionally, reducing sedentary behaviours is recommended across all age groups and abilities, although evidence was insufficient to quantify a sedentary behaviour threshold. Conclusion These 2020 WHO guidelines update previous WHO recommendations released in 2010. They reaffirm messages that some physical activity is better than none, that more physical activity is better for optimal health outcomes and provide a new recommendation on reducing sedentary behaviours. These guidelines highlight the importance of regularly undertaking both aerobic and muscle strengthening activities and for the first time, there are specific recommendations for specific populations including for pregnant and postpartum women and people living with chronic conditions or disability. These guidelines should be used to inform national health policies aligned with the WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030 and to strengthen surveillance systems that track progress towards national and global targets.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An Ecological Perspective on Health Promotion Programs

            During the past 20 years there has been a dramatic increase in societal interest in preventing disability and death in the United States by changing individual behaviors linked to the risk of contracting chronic diseases. This renewed interest in health promotion and disease prevention has not been without its critics. Some critics have accused proponents of life-style interventions of promoting a victim-blaming ideology by neglecting the importance of social influences on health and disease. This article proposes an ecological model for health promotion which focuses attention on both individual and social environmental factors as targets for health promotion interventions. It addresses the importance of interventions directed at changing interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy, factors which support and maintain unhealthy behaviors. The model assumes that appropriate changes in the social environment will produce changes in individuals, and that the support of individuals in the population is essential for implementing environmental changes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Focus Groups as Qualitative Research

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2359925/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2207298/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2009221/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/448780/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1108363/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                02 February 2024
                2024
                : 12
                : 1280893
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS GmbH , Bremen, Germany
                [2] 2Institute for Public Health and Nursing- IPP, Bremen University , Bremen, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, BIPS GmbH , Bremen, Germany
                [4] 4Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen , Bremen, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Elizabeth C. Matsui, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

                Reviewed by: Sitong Chen, Center for Lifestyle and Mental Health, Shenzhen University, China

                Harriet Koorts, Deakin University, Australia

                *Correspondence: Louisa Sell, sell@ 123456leibniz-bips.de
                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2024.1280893
                10869510
                35e2296c-cbf4-4682-aaca-7fddb8428fa3
                Copyright © 2024 Sell, Brandes, Brandes, Zeeb and Busse.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 21 August 2023
                : 19 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 46, Pages: 11, Words: 9390
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Health, doi 10.13039/501100004726;
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Federal Ministry of Health, Germany (Grant number 1504–54401).
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Children and Health

                physical activity,perspectives of children,primary schools,teachers,parents,socio-ecological model,qualitative research,focus groups

                Comments

                Comment on this article