0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Oncoplastic surgery in the USA: a review of where we started, where we are today and where we are headed

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The surgical management of breast cancer has evolved tremendously over the last century and now includes oncoplastic techniques that improve both cosmetic and oncologic outcomes for patients. The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with a broad overview of the history of oncoplastic breast surgery in the United States (USA), and to summarize important patient factors and technical innovations for optimal operative planning in the era of multimodal treatment of breast cancer. The indications for oncoplastic surgery (OPS) have broadened significantly as more women pursue breast conservation with preservation of their native breast tissue. The operative philosophy of OPS is based on fundamental reconstructive principles, with technique selection based largely on tumor size and location. Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy techniques have become some of the most utilized procedures in OPS due to their versatility to address tumors in almost all areas of the breast. Volume replacement techniques with locoregional perforator flaps continue to gain popularity as a single-stage reconstructive option for women with large tumor to breast ratios, especially with specialized plastic surgeons at high volume, academic centers. The oncologic advantages of OPS have allowed women to avoid mastectomy with improved margin control, re-excision rates, and equivalent overall survival all while preserving the aesthetic outcomes for these patients. Despite the proven benefits of OPS, numerous healthcare systems barriers including insurance status, geographic location, referral patterns, and racial disparities all continue to play a role in access to surgical sub-specialized breast oncology care demonstrating the need for ongoing research and education about oncoplastic principles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer

          New England Journal of Medicine, 347(16), 1233-1241
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

            We conducted 20 years of follow-up of women enrolled in a randomized trial to compare the efficacy of radical (Halsted) mastectomy with that of breast-conserving surgery. From 1973 to 1980, 701 women with breast cancers measuring no more than 2 cm in diameter were randomly assigned to undergo radical mastectomy (349 patients) or breast-conserving surgery (quadrantectomy) followed by radiotherapy to the ipsilateral mammary tissue (352 patients). After 1976, patients in both groups who had positive axillary nodes also received adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. Thirty women in the group that underwent breast-conserving therapy had a recurrence of tumor in the same breast, whereas eight women in the radical-mastectomy group had local recurrences (P<0.001). The crude cumulative incidence of these events was 8.8 percent and 2.3 percent, respectively, after 20 years. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the rates of contralateral-breast carcinomas, distant metastases, or second primary cancers. After a median follow-up of 20 years, the rate of death from all causes was 41.7 percent in the group that underwent breast-conserving surgery and 41.2 percent in the radical-mastectomy group (P=1.0). The respective rates of death from breast cancer were 26.1 percent and 24.3 percent (P=0.8). The long-term survival rate among women who undergo breast-conserving surgery is the same as that among women who undergo radical mastectomy. Breast-conserving surgery is therefore the treatment of choice for women with relatively small breast cancers. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery.

              Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) has emerged as a new approach for extending breast conserving surgery (BCS) possibilities, reducing both mastectomy and re-excision rates, while avoiding breast deformities. OPS is based upon the integration of plastic surgery techniques for immediate reshaping after wide excision for breast cancer. A simple guide for choosing the appropriate OPS procedure is not available. To develop an Atlas and guideline for oncoplastic surgery (OPS) to help in patient selection and choice of optimal surgical procedure for breast cancer patients undergoing BCS. We stratify OPS into two levels based on excision volume and the complexity of the reshaping technique. For resections less than 20% of the breast volume (level I OPS), a step-by-step approach allows easy reshaping of the breast. For larger resections (level II OPS), a mammoplasty technique is required. We identified three elements that can be used for patient selection and for determination of the appropriate OPS technique: excision volume, tumor location, and glandular density. For level II techniques, we defined a quadrant per quadrant Atlas that offers a different mammoplasty for each quadrant of the breast. OPS is the "third pathway" between standard BCS and mastectomy. The OPS classification and Atlas improves patient selection and allows a uniform approach for surgeons. It proposes a specific solution for different scenarios and helps improve breast conservation outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gland Surg
                Gland Surg
                GS
                Gland Surgery
                AME Publishing Company
                2227-684X
                2227-8575
                16 May 2024
                30 May 2024
                : 13
                : 5
                : 749-759
                Affiliations
                [1]deptDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery , Emory University , Atlanta, GA, USA
                Author notes

                Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: GDP Garcia Nores; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: LM Willcox, GDP Garcia Nores; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: LM Willcox, GDP Garcia Nores; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

                Correspondence to: Gabriela del Pilar Garcia Nores, MD. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Email: gdgarc2@ 123456emory.edu .
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4395-4782
                Article
                gs-13-05-749
                10.21037/gs-23-363
                11150193
                3562b111-1f46-45c8-8df6-5a2e2cd88c6b
                2024 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 13 September 2023
                : 25 March 2024
                Categories
                Review Article

                oncoplastic breast surgery,oncoplastic breast reduction,oncoplastic surgery (ops),breast cancer reconstruction

                Comments

                Comment on this article