8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Failure with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: From Molecular Evidences to Clinical Implications

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasing and its challenging diagnosis and management combines clinical, imagistic and biological data. Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are hormones secreted in response to myocardial stretch that, by increasing cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), counteract myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy, increase natriuresis and determine vasodilatation. While their role in HFpEF is controversial, most authors focused on b-type natriuretic peptides (BNPs) and agreed that patients may show lower levels. In this setting, newer molecules with an increased specificity, such as middle-region pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), emerged as promising markers. Augmenting NP levels, either by NP analogs or breakdown inhibition, could offer a new therapeutic target in HFpEF (already approved in their reduced EF counterparts) by increasing the deficient cGMP levels found in patients. Importantly, these peptides also retain their prognostic value. This narrative review focuses on NPs’ physiology, diagnosis, therapeutic and prognostic implication in HFpEF.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Simple, Evidence-Based Approach to Help Guide Diagnosis of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

          Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is challenging in euvolemic patients with dyspnea, and no evidence-based criteria are available. We sought to develop and then validate noninvasive diagnostic criteria that could be used to estimate the likelihood that HFpEF is present among patients with unexplained dyspnea to guide further testing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Natriuretic peptide-based screening and collaborative care for heart failure: the STOP-HF randomized trial.

            Prevention strategies for heart failure are needed. To determine the efficacy of a screening program using brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and collaborative care in an at-risk population in reducing newly diagnosed heart failure and prevalence of significant left ventricular (LV) systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction. The St Vincent's Screening to Prevent Heart Failure Study, a parallel-group randomized trial involving 1374 participants with cardiovascular risk factors (mean age, 64.8 [SD, 10.2] years) recruited from 39 primary care practices in Ireland between January 2005 and December 2009 and followed up until December 2011 (mean follow-up, 4.2 [SD, 1.2] years). Patients were randomly assigned to receive usual primary care (control condition; n=677) or screening with BNP testing (n=697). Intervention-group participants with BNP levels of 50 pg/mL or higher underwent echocardiography and collaborative care between their primary care physician and specialist cardiovascular service. The primary end point was prevalence of asymptomatic LV dysfunction with or without newly diagnosed heart failure. Secondary end points included emergency hospitalization for arrhythmia, transient ischemic attack, stroke, myocardial infarction, peripheral or pulmonary thrombosis/embolus, or heart failure. A total of 263 patients (41.6%) in the intervention group had at least 1 BNP reading of 50 pg/mL or higher. The intervention group underwent more cardiovascular investigations (control, 496 per 1000 patient-years vs intervention, 850 per 1000 patient-years; incidence rate ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.61-1.83; P<.001) and received more renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-based therapy at follow-up (control, 49.6%; intervention, 56.5%; P=.01). The primary end point of LV dysfunction with or without heart failure was met in 59 (8.7%) of 677 in the control group and 37 (5.3%) of 697 in the intervention group (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.82; P = .003). Asymptomatic LV dysfunction was found in 45 (6.6%) of 677 control-group patients and 30 (4.3%) of 697 intervention-group patients (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.88; P = .01). Heart failure occurred in 14 (2.1%) of 677 control-group patients and 7 (1.0%) of 697 intervention-group patients (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.20-1.20; P = .12). The incidence rates of emergency hospitalization for major cardiovascular events were 40.4 per 1000 patient-years in the control group vs 22.3 per 1000 patient-years in the intervention group (incidence rate ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.81; P = .002). Among patients at risk of heart failure, BNP-based screening and collaborative care reduced the combined rates of LV systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, and heart failure. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00921960.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.

              This study sought to determine the prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), in comparison to data in HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) EF (≤40%). Management of patients with HFPEF is difficult. BNP is a useful biomarker in patients with reduced LVEF, but data in HFPEF are scarce. In this study, 615 patients with mild to moderate HF (mean age 70 years, LVEF 33%) were followed for 18 months. BNP concentrations were measured at baseline and were related to the primary outcome, that is, a composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, and to mortality alone. The population was divided in quintiles, according to LVEF, and patients with reduced LVEF were compared with those with HFPEF. There were 257 patients (42%) who had a primary endpoint and 171 (28%) who died. BNP levels were significantly higher in patients with reduced LVEF than in those with HFPEF (p < 0.001). BNP was a strong predictor of outcome, but LVEF was not. Importantly, if similar levels of BNP were compared across the whole spectrum of LVEF, and for different cutoff levels of LVEF, the associated risk of adverse outcome was similar in HFPEF patients as in those with reduced LVEF. BNP levels are lower in patients with HFPEF than in patients with HF with reduced LVEF, but for a given BNP level, the prognosis in patients with HFPEF is as poor as in those with reduced LVEF. Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                28 May 2019
                June 2019
                : 20
                : 11
                : 2629
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Internal Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700111 Iasi, Romania; tanasedm@ 123456gmail.com (D.M.T.); sanziana.alshurbaji@ 123456yahoo.com (S.A.S.); ank_mihailescu@ 123456yahoo.com (A.O.); floria_mariana@ 123456yahoo.com (M.F.)
                [2 ]Internal Medicine Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania
                [3 ]Cardiology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. George I.M. Georgescu” Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 700503 Iasi, Romania
                [4 ]Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 700115 Iasi, Romania
                [5 ]Department of Surgery, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700111 Iasi, Romania; hauliviagenoveva@ 123456hotmail.com
                [6 ]Vascular Surgery Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, 700115 Iasi, Romania
                [7 ]Department of Ophthalmology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; costea10@ 123456yahoo.com
                [8 ]2nd Ophthalmology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu” Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iași, Romania
                [9 ]Department of Neurosurgery, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iași, Romania; turliuc_dana@ 123456yahoo.com
                [10 ]2nd Neurosurgery Clinic, “Prof. Dr. Nicolae Oblu” Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iași, Romania
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: radu.smaranda@ 123456gmail.com ; Tel.: +40-232-240-822
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8873-2887
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9465-1503
                Article
                ijms-20-02629
                10.3390/ijms20112629
                6600439
                31142058
                35317552-5fff-4a29-a96f-a4b01786623c
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 07 April 2019
                : 24 May 2019
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                heart failure,natriuretic peptides,preserved ejection fraction
                Molecular biology
                heart failure, natriuretic peptides, preserved ejection fraction

                Comments

                Comment on this article