5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Brucellosis, caused by several species of the genus Brucella, is a zoonotic disease that affects humans and animal species worldwide. Information on the Brucella species circulating in different hosts in Kenya is largely unknown, thus limiting the adoption of targeted control strategies. This study was conducted in multi-host livestock populations in Kenya to detect the circulating Brucella species and assess evidence of host–pathogen associations. Serum samples were collected from 228 cattle, 162 goats, 158 sheep, 49 camels, and 257 humans from Narok and Marsabit counties in Kenya. Information on age, location and history of abortion or retained placenta were obtained for sampled livestock. Data on age, gender and location of residence were also collected for human participants. All samples were tested using genus level real-time PCR assays with primers specific for IS 711 and bcsp31 targets for the detection of Brucella. All genus positive samples (positive for both targets) were further tested with a speciation assay for AlkB and BMEI1162 targets, specific for B. abortus and B. melitensis, respectively. Samples with adequate quantities aggregating to 577 were also tested with the Rose Bengal Test (RBT). A total of 199 (33.3%) livestock and 99 (38.5%) human samples tested positive for genus Brucella. Animal Brucella PCR positive status was positively predicted by RBT positive results (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 4.0–17.1). Humans aged 21–40 years had higher odds (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.2–6.6) of being Brucella PCR positive compared to the other age categories. The data on detection of different Brucella species indicates that B. abortus was detected more often in cattle (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.6) and camels (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.3–6.3) , while B. melitensis was detected more in sheep (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 2.0–6.7) and goats (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–3.1). Both B. abortus and B. melitensis DNA were detected in humans and in multiple livestock host species, suggesting cross-transmission of these species among the different hosts. The detection of these two zoonotic Brucella species in humans further underpins the importance of One Health prevention strategies that target multiple host species, especially in the multi-host livestock populations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology, control and impact.

            Brucellosis is an important disease among livestock and people in sub-Saharan Africa. In general, the incidence is the highest in pastoral production systems and decreases as herd size and size of landholding decreases. The prevalence of risk factors for infections are best understood for bovine brucellosis and to a lesser extent for ovine and caprine brucellosis. The occurrence and epidemiology of brucellosis in pigs is poorly understood. This species bias is also reflected in control activities. As with other public-sector animal health services, the surveillance and control of brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa is rarely implemented outside southern Africa. Brucellosis is even more ignored in humans and most cases go undiagnosed and untreated, leading to considerable suffering for those affected. Decision-making to determine the importance of brucellosis control relative to other public concerns and what brucellosis control strategies should be applied is urgently required. A strategy for how brucellosis decision-making might be considered and applied in future is outlined. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Brucellosis at the animal/ecosystem/human interface at the beginning of the 21st century.

              Following the recent discovery of new Brucella strains from different animal species and from the environment, ten Brucella species are nowadays included in the genus Brucella. Although the intracellular trafficking of Brucella is well described, the strategies developed by Brucella to survive and multiply in phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells, particularly to access nutriments during its intracellular journey, are still largely unknown. Metabolism and virulence of Brucella are now considered to be two sides of the same coin. Mechanisms presiding to the colonization of the pregnant uterus in different animal species are not known. Vaccination is the cornerstone of control programs in livestock and although the S19, RB51 (both in cattle) and Rev 1 (in sheep and goats) vaccines have been successfully used worldwide, they have drawbacks and thus the ideal brucellosis vaccine is still very much awaited. There is no vaccine available for pigs and wildlife. Animal brucellosis control strategies differ in the developed and the developing world. Most emphasis is put on eradication and on risk analysis to avoid the re-introduction of Brucella in the developed world. Information related to the prevalence of brucellosis is still scarce in the developing world and control programs are rarely implemented. Since there is no vaccine available for humans, prevention of human brucellosis relies on its control in the animal reservoir. Brucella is also considered to be an agent to be used in bio- and agroterrorism attacks. At the animal/ecosystem/human interface it is critical to reduce opportunities for Brucella to jump host species as already seen in livestock, wildlife and humans. This task is a challenge for the future in terms of veterinary public health, as for wildlife and ecosystem managers and will need a "One Health" approach to be successful. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jamesakoko@yahoo.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                23 April 2021
                23 April 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 8881
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.442486.8, ISNI 0000 0001 0744 8172, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technology, , Maseno University, ; Kisumu, Kenya
                [2 ]GRID grid.419369.0, Biosciences Eastern and Central Africa-International Livestock Research Institute (BecA-ILRI) Hub KE, ; Nairobi, Kenya
                [3 ]GRID grid.419369.0, International Livestock Research Institute, ; Nairobi, Kenya
                [4 ]GRID grid.11887.37, ISNI 0000 0000 9428 8105, Sokoine University of Agriculture, ; Morogoro, Tanzania
                [5 ]GRID grid.494614.a, ISNI 0000 0004 5946 6665, Department of Biological Sciences, , University of Embu, ; Embu, Kenya
                [6 ]GRID grid.10025.36, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, , University of Liverpool, ; Liverpool, UK
                [7 ]GRID grid.442486.8, ISNI 0000 0001 0744 8172, Department of Public Health, , Maseno University, ; Kisumu, Kenya
                [8 ]GRID grid.462846.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0697 1172, Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire, ; Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
                [9 ]GRID grid.451346.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0468 1595, Nelson Mandela African Institute of Science and Technology, ; Arusha, Tanzania
                [10 ]Vétérinaires Sans Frontières Suisse, Bern, Switzerland
                [11 ]GRID grid.8756.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2193 314X, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, , University of Glasgow, ; Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK
                Article
                88327
                10.1038/s41598-021-88327-z
                8065124
                33893352
                35234b42-d232-4c7e-9838-d423927da8dc
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 September 2020
                : 9 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Bill
                Funded by: DELTA Africa Initiative
                Award ID: Afrique One-ASPIRE /DEL-15-008
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                policy and public health in microbiology,bacterial infection
                Uncategorized
                policy and public health in microbiology, bacterial infection

                Comments

                Comment on this article