2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of Rapid Up-Titration of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies on Quality of Life: Insights From the STRONG-HF Trial

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 1 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 1 , 13 , 14 , 1 , 13 , 5 , 4 , 5 , 15 , 7 , 16 , 17 , 4 , 18 , 5 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 18 , 1 , 13 , 1 , 3 , 4
      Circulation: Heart Failure
      Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND:

          This analysis provides details on baseline and changes in quality of life (QoL) and its components as measured by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, as well as association with objective outcomes, applying high-intensity heart failure (HF) care in patients with acute HF.

          METHODS:

          In STRONG-HF trial (Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by NT-proBNP Testing, of Heart Failure Therapies) patients with acute HF were randomized just before discharge to either usual care or a high-intensity care strategy of guideline-directed medical therapy up-titration. Patients ranked their state of health on the EQ-5D visual analog scale score ranging from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health) at baseline and at 90 days follow-up.

          RESULTS:

          In 1072 patients with acute HF with available assessment of QoL (539/533 patients assigned high-intensity care/usual care) the mean baseline EQ-visual analog scale score was 59.2 (SD, 15.1) with no difference between the treatment groups. Patients with lower baseline EQ-visual analog scale (meaning worse QoL) were more likely to be women, self-reported Black and non-European ( P <0.001). The strongest independent predictors of a greater improvement in QoL were younger age ( P <0.001), no HF hospitalization in the previous year ( P <0.001), lower NYHA class before hospital admission ( P <0.001) and high-intensity care treatment (mean difference, 4.2 [95% CI, 2.5–5.8]; P <0.001). No statistically significant heterogeneity in the benefits of high-intensity care was seen across patient subgroups of different ages, with left ventricular ejection fraction above or below 40%, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and systolic blood pressure above or below the median value. The treatment effect on the primary end point did not vary significantly across baseline EQ-visual analog scale ( P interaction =0.87).

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Early up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy significantly improves all dimensions of QoL in patients with HF and improves prognosis regardless of baseline self-assessed health status. The likelihood of achieving optimal doses of HF medications does not depend on baseline QoL.

          REGISTRATION:

          URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03412201.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

          Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature

              Purpose Although the EQ-5D has a long history of use in a wide range of populations, the newer five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) has not yet had such extensive experience. This systematic review summarizes the available published scientific evidence on the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L. Methods Pre-determined key words and exclusion criteria were used to systematically search publications from 2011 to 2019. Information on study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted: specifically, EQ-5D-5L distribution (including ceiling and floor), missing values, reliability (test–retest), validity (convergent, known-groups, discriminate) and responsiveness (distribution, anchor-based). EQ-5D-5L index value means, ceiling and correlation coefficients (convergent validity) were pooled across the studies using random-effects models. Results Of the 889 identified publications, 99 were included for review, representing 32 countries. Musculoskeletal/orthopedic problems and cancer (n = 8 each) were most often studied. Most papers found missing values (17 of 17 papers) and floor effects (43 of 48 papers) to be unproblematic. While the index was found to be reliable (9 of 9 papers), individual dimensions exhibited instability over time. Index values and dimensions demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with global health measures, other multi-attribute utility instruments, physical/functional health, pain, activities of daily living, and clinical/biological measures. The instrument was not correlated with life satisfaction and cognition/communication measures. Responsiveness was addressed by 15 studies, finding moderate effect sizes when confined to studied subgroups with improvements in health. Conclusions The EQ-5D-5L exhibits excellent psychometric properties across a broad range of populations, conditions and settings. Rigorous exploration of its responsiveness is needed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Circulation: Heart Failure
                Circ: Heart Failure
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                1941-3289
                1941-3297
                April 2024
                April 2024
                : 17
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinic of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania (J.Č., K.Č-B.).
                [2 ]Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR-S 942 (MASCOT), France (G.C., A.C.-S., E.G., V.L., A.M., B.D.).
                [3 ]Heart Initiative, Durham, NC (G.C., B.D.).
                [4 ]Momentum Research, Inc, Durham, NC. (G.C., C.E., M.B., M.N., K.T., B.D.).
                [5 ]Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Italy (M. Adamo, M.M., M.P., D.T.).
                [6 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Stadtspital Zurich, Switzerland (M. Arrigo).
                [7 ]Institute of Heart Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland (J.B., P.P.).
                [8 ]Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases “Prof. C.C.Iliescu,” University of Medicine “Carol Davila,” Bucharest, Romania (O.C.).
                [9 ]Department of Cardiology, APHP Nord, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France (A.C.-S.).
                [10 ]Faculty of Medicine, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique (A.D.).
                [11 ]Estudios Clínicos Latinoamérica, Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario, Argentina (R.D.).
                [12 ]National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Greece (G.F.).
                [13 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Saint-Louis and Lariboisière Hospitals, FHU PROMICE, DMU Parabol, APHP Nord, Paris, France (E.G., V.L., A.M.).
                [14 ]Université de Lorraine, Nancy; INSERM, Défaillance Circulatoire Aigue et Chronique; Service de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation Brabois, CHRU de Nancy, France (A.K.).
                [15 ]Departments of Emergency Medicine and Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (P.S.P.).
                [16 ]Murtala Muhammed Specialist Hospital/Bayero University Kano, Nigeria (H.S.).
                [17 ]Cape Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, South Africa (K.S.).
                [18 ]Department of Cardiology, Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands (J.M.T.M., A.A.V.).
                [19 ]National Heart Centre Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore (C.S.P.L.).
                [20 ]Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA (C.S.P.L.).
                [21 ]University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands (C.S.P.L.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011221
                38445950
                3505eb07-4ef0-439a-9a34-20c409112a7a
                © 2024
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article