23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ACL Repair: A Game Changer or Will History Repeat Itself? A Critical Appraisal

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Until the past decade the common thought was that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was not able to heal and restore knee stability. In this manuscript a brief review of studies of the developers and the early adaptors of four different modern ACL repair techniques are presented. The present status and considerations for the future of ACL repair and its research are shared. After promising short- to midterm ACL healing results by the developers, the results of the early adaptors show more variety in terms of rerupture and reintervention for other reasons. Risk factors for failure are a young age, high preinjury sports activity level, midsubstance ruptures and impaired integrity of the ACL bundles and the synovial sheath. There is a call for more clinical data and randomized clinical trials. Conclusion: an important finding of the past decade is that the ACL is able to heal and subsequently restabilize the knee. Patient selection is emphasized: the ideal patient is a non-high athlete older than 25 and has an acute proximal one bundle ACL rupture. Further research will have to show if ACL repair could be a game changer or if history will repeat itself.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study.

          The incidence of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in the general population is not well defined.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the International ALC Consensus Group Meeting

              The structure and function of the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee has created much controversy since the 're-discovery' of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its proposed role in aiding control of anterolateral rotatory laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee. A group of surgeons and researchers prominent in the field gathered to produce consensus as to the anatomy and biomechanical properties of the ALC. The evidence for and against utilisation of ALC reconstruction was also discussed, generating a number of consensus statements by following a modified Delphi process. Key points include that the ALC consists of the superficial and deep aspects of the iliotibial tract with its Kaplan fibre attachments on the distal femur, along with the ALL, a capsular structure within the anterolateral capsule. A number of structures attach to the area of the Segond fracture including the capsule-osseous layer of the iliotibial band, the ALL and the anterior arm of the short head of biceps, and hence it is not clear which is responsible for this lesion. The ALC functions to provide anterolateral rotatory stability as a secondary stabiliser to the ACL. Whilst biomechanical studies have shown that these structures play an important role in controlling stability at the time of ACL reconstruction, the optimal surgical procedure has not yet been defined clinically. Concern remains that these procedures may cause constraint of motion, yet no clinical studies have demonstrated an increased risk of osteoarthritis development. Furthermore, clinical evidence is currently lacking to support clear indications for lateral extra-articular procedures as an augmentation to ACL reconstruction. The resulting statements and scientific rationale aim to inform readers on the most current thinking and identify areas of needed basic science and clinical research to help improve patient outcomes following ACL injury and subsequent reconstruction.Level of evidence V.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                26 February 2021
                March 2021
                : 10
                : 5
                : 912
                Affiliations
                Department of Orthopedics, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; Krik.Heusdens@ 123456uza.be ; Tel.: +32-3-821-5483
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0385-8128
                Article
                jcm-10-00912
                10.3390/jcm10050912
                7956607
                33652689
                34c9c419-a7b0-4df7-8373-a0486e4e277b
                © 2021 by the author.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 December 2020
                : 22 February 2021
                Categories
                Review

                anterior cruciate ligament,acl repair,dynamic intraligamentary stabilization,suture tape augmentation,suture tape reinforcement,suture anchor primary repair,bridge-enhanced acl repair

                Comments

                Comment on this article