1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Invasive fungal infections in critically ill children: epidemiology, risk factors and antifungal drugs

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are important infectious complications amongst critically ill children. The most common fungal infections are due to Candida species. Aspergillus, Zygomycetes and Fusarium are also emerging because of the empirical use of antifungal drugs. This updated review discusses the epidemiology of IFIs as well as antifungal drugs, dosing and potential adverse effects in critically ill children.

          Methods

          A PubMed search was conducted with Clinical Queries using the key terms “antifungal”, “children”, “critical care” AND “paediatric intensive care unit” OR “PICU”. The search strategy included clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, observational studies and reviews and was limited to the English literature in paediatrics.

          Results

          Candida and Aspergillus spp. are the most prevalent fungi in paediatric IFIs, causing invasive candidiasis infections (ICIs) and invasive aspergillosis infections (IAIs), respectively. These IFIs are associated with high morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Candida albicans is the principal Candida spp. associated with paediatric ICIs. The risks and epidemiology for IFIs vary if considering previously healthy children treated in the paediatric intensive care unit or children with leukaemia, malignancy or a severe haematological disease. The mortality rate for IAIs in children is 2.5–3.5-fold higher than for ICIs. Four major classes of antifungals for critically ill children are azoles, polyenes, antifungal antimetabolites and echinocandins.

          Conclusions

          Antifungal agents are highly efficacious. For successful treatment outcomes, it is crucial to determine the optimal dosage, monitor pharmacokinetics parameters and adverse effects, and individualized therapeutic monitoring. Despite potent antifungal medications, ICIs and IAIs continue to be serious infections with high mortality rates. Pre-emptive therapy has been used for IAIs. Most guidelines recommend voriconazole as initial therapy of invasive aspergillosis in most patients, with consideration of combination therapy with voriconazole plus an echinocandin in selected patients with severe disease. The challenge is to identify critically ill patients at high risks of ICIs for targeted prophylaxis. Intravenous/per os fluconazole is first-line pre-emptive treatment for Candida spp. whereas intravenous micafungin or intravenous liposomal amphotericin B is alternative pre-emptive treatment.

          This article is part of the Challenges and strategies in the management of invasive fungal infections Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/challenges-and-strategies-in-the-management-of-invasive-fungal-infections

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america.

          Cryptococcosis is a global invasive mycosis associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These guidelines for its management have been built on the previous Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines from 2000 and include new sections. There is a discussion of the management of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in 3 risk groups: (1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals, (2) organ transplant recipients, and (3) non-HIV-infected and nontransplant hosts. There are specific recommendations for other unique risk populations, such as children, pregnant women, persons in resource-limited environments, and those with Cryptococcus gattii infection. Recommendations for management also include other sites of infection, including strategies for pulmonary cryptococcosis. Emphasis has been placed on potential complications in management of cryptococcal infection, including increased intracranial pressure, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), drug resistance, and cryptococcomas. Three key management principles have been articulated: (1) induction therapy for meningoencephalitis using fungicidal regimens, such as a polyene and flucytosine, followed by suppressive regimens using fluconazole; (2) importance of early recognition and treatment of increased intracranial pressure and/or IRIS; and (3) the use of lipid formulations of amphotericin B regimens in patients with renal impairment. Cryptococcosis remains a challenging management issue, with little new drug development or recent definitive studies. However, if the diagnosis is made early, if clinicians adhere to the basic principles of these guidelines, and if the underlying disease is controlled, then cryptococcosis can be managed successfully in the vast majority of patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Aspergillosis case-fatality rate: systematic review of the literature.

            To update the case-fatality rate (CFR) associated with invasive aspergillosis according to underlying conditions, site of infection, and antifungal therapy, data were systematically reviewed and pooled from clinical trials, cohort or case-control studies, and case series of >/=10 patients with definite or probable aspergillosis. Subjects were 1941 patients described in studies published after 1995 that provided sufficient outcome data; cases included were identified by MEDLINE and EMBASE searches. The main outcome measure was the CFR. Fifty of 222 studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall CFR was 58%, and the CFR was highest for bone marrow transplant recipients (86.7%) and for patients with central nervous system or disseminated aspergillosis (88.1%). Amphotericin B deoxycholate and lipid formulations of amphotericin B failed to prevent death in one-half to two-thirds of patients. Mortality is high despite improvements in diagnosis and despite the advent of newer formulations of amphotericin B. Underlying patient conditions and the site of infection remain important prognostic factors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity.

              Because of the increasing prevalence and changing microbiological spectrum of invasive fungal infections, some form of amphotericin B still provides the most reliable and broad spectrum therapeutic alternative. However, the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate is accompanied by dose-limited toxicities, most importantly, infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. In an attempt to improve the therapeutic index of amphotericin B, three lipid-associated formulations were developed, including amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB), and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD). The lipid composition of all three of these preparations differs considerably and contributes to substantially different pharmacokinetic parameters. ABLC is the largest of the lipid preparations. Because of its size, it is taken up rapidly by macrophages and becomes sequestered in tissues of the mononuclear phagocyte system such as the liver and spleen. Consequently, compared with the conventional formulation, it has lower circulating amphotericin B serum concentrations, reflected in a marked increase in volume of distribution and clearance. Lung levels are considerably higher than those achieved with other lipid-associated preparations. The recommended therapeutic dose of ABLC is 5 mg/kg/day. Because of its small size and negative charge, L-AmB avoids substantial recognition and uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system. Therefore, a single dose of L-AmB results in a much higher peak plasma level (Cmax) than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate and a much larger area under the concentration-time curve. Tissue concentrations in patients receiving L-AmB tend to be highest in the liver and spleen and much lower in kidneys and lung. Recommended therapeutic dosages are 3-6 mg/kg/day. After intravenous infusion, ABCD complexes remain largely intact and are rapidly removed from the circulation by cells of the macrophage phagocyte system. On a milligram-to-milligram basis, the Cmax achieved is lower than that attained by conventional amphotericin B, although the larger doses of ABCD that are administered produce an absolute level that is similar to amphotericin B. ABCD exhibits dose-limiting, infusion-related toxicities; consequently, the administered dosages should not exceed 3-4 mg/kg/day. The few comparative clinical trials that have been completed with the lipid-associated formulations have not demonstrated important clinical differences among these agents and amphotericin B for efficacy, although there are significant safety benefits of the lipid products. Furthermore, only one published trial has ever compared one lipid product against another for any indication. The results of these trials are particularly difficult to interpret because of major heterogeneities in study design, disease definitions, drug dosages, differences in clinical and microbiological endpoints as well as specific outcomes examined. Nevertheless, it is possible to derive some general conclusions given the available data. The most commonly studied syndrome has been empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients, where the lipid-associated preparations did not appear to provide a survival benefit over conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate, but did offer a significant advantage for the prevention of various breakthrough invasive fungal infections. For treatment of documented invasive fungal infections that usually involved hematological malignancy patients, no individual randomized trial has demonstrated a mortality benefit due to therapy with one of the lipid formulations. Results from meta-analyses have been contradictory, with one demonstrating a mortality benefit from all-cause mortality and one that did not demonstrate a mortality benefit. In the only published study to examine HIV-infected patients with disseminated histoplasmosis, clinical success and mortality were significantly better with L-AmB compared with amphotericin B deoxycholate; there were no differences in microbiological outcomes between treatment groups. The lipid-associated preparations were not significantly better than amphotericin B deoxycholate for treatment of AIDS-associated acute cryptococcal meningitis for either clinical or microbiological outcomes that were studied. In all of the trials that specifically examined renal toxicity, the lipid-associated formulations were significantly less nephrotoxic than amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related reactions occurred less frequently with L-AmB when compared with amphotericin B deoxycholate; however, ABCD had equivalent or more frequent infusion-related reactions than conventional amphotericin B, and this resulted in the cessation of at least one clinical trial. At the present time, this particular lipid formulation is no longer commercially available. For the treatment of most invasive fungal infections, an amphotericin B lipid formulation provides a safer alternative than conventional amphotericin B, with at least equivalent efficacy. As the cost of therapy with these agents continues to decline, these drugs will likely maintain their important role in the antifungal drug armamentarium because of their efficacy and improved safety profile.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Drugs Context
                Drugs Context
                DIC
                Drugs in Context
                BioExcel Publishing Ltd
                1745-1981
                1740-4398
                2024
                17 June 2024
                : 13
                : 2023-9-2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, China
                [2 ]Department of Paediatrics, CUHKMC, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
                [3 ]Department of Pharmacy, Hong Kong Children’s Hospital, Hong Kong, China
                [4 ]Department of Pediatrics, The University of Calgary, and The Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Kam Lun Ellis Hon, Department of Paediatrics, CUHKMC, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Email: ehon@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-5529
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2254-6971
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6689-7194
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5941-1478
                Article
                dic-2023-9-2
                10.7573/dic.2023-9-2
                11195526
                38915918
                33f2f04d-b1af-4cb7-afe5-1a39dc5ad4d6
                Copyright © 2024 Hon KLE, Chan VPY, Leung AKC, Leung KKY, Hui WF

                Published by Drugs in Context under Creative Commons License Deed CC BY NC ND 4.0, which allows anyone to copy, distribute, and transmit the article provided it is properly attributed in the manner specified below. No commercial use without permission.

                History
                : 05 September 2023
                : 20 February 2024
                Categories
                Review

                antifungal,critical,haemopoietic stem cell transplantation,intensive care,invasive aspergillosis,invasive candidiasis,paediatric

                Comments

                Comment on this article