3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical and radiological outcome of Mason-Johnston types III and IV radial head fractures treated by an on-table reconstruction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Only few methods treating comminuted radial head fractures have been established providing sufficient joint reconstruction, restoring radial length and enabling early joint mobilization. When an anatomical reconstruction using open reduction and internal fixation is not possible, radial head resection or primary arthroplasty is often conducted. An “Ex situ/on-table” reconstruction is widely disregarded but can be an option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of comminuted radial head fractures treated with an “on-table” reconstruction and internal fixation using a low profile plate.

          Methods

          Fourteen patients who sustained a radial head fracture (9 Mason-Johnston type III and 5 Mason-Johnston type IV) and were treated with an “on-table” reconstruction between 2010 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients mean age was 41.3 years (range 21–69). The clinical evaluation included active range of motion, grip strength, pain level and elbow stability. The functional outcome was assessed using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and the Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), Broberg and Morrey score. The radiological examination included a.p. and lateral views of the injured elbow to evaluate nonunions, loss of reduction, joint alignment, avascular radial head necrosis, heterotopic ossifications and posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

          Results

          The inclusion rate was 74% with a mean follow-up of 50 months (range 16–128). The mean elbow flexion of the injured side was 126° (range110–145°) with an average extension loss of 8° (range 0–40°). Pronation was 65° (15–90°) and supination 66° (5–90°). The mean MEPI was 87 points (range 45–100). The mean DASH score was 13 points (range 1–88). According to the Broberg and Morrey functional scoring system, the average score was 92 points (range 88–100). Complete bone union was achieved in 9 cases, partial union in 4 cases and nonunion in one case. There were no signs of avascular necrosis of the radial head. Signs of post-traumatic osteoarthritis were seen in 11 cases. Five patients needed an implant removal due to a radio-ulnar impingement and one patient a revision surgery due to the nonunion and implant breakage.

          Conclusions

          An on-table (ex situ) reconstruction of the radial head is a reliable option with a good clinical outcome and low complication rate in the surgical treatment of comminuted radial head fractures. It can restore joint alignment and maintain radial length. The risk for avascular necrosis is neglectable, and the bone healing rate is high.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow.

          Many scoring systems have been used for elbow disorders. However, only few of these have been validated, and many assess only few aspects of elbow function. A literature search was performed using the keyword 'elbow' in combination with 'scoring system', 'outcome assessment', 'elbow disorder' and 'clinical evaluation'. Eighteen scoring systems are currently available for the evaluation of elbow disorders. Each of them evaluates the elbow performance using specific variables, including both objective and subjective criteria. All these scoring systems are presented. Although many scoring systems have been used to evaluate elbow function, we are still far from a single outcome evaluation system which is reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically relevant changes, takes into account both patients' and physicians' perspective and is short and practical to use. Further studies are required to evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the elbow scoring systems used in the common clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Results of treatment of fracture-dislocations of the elbow.

            Twenty-four patients with ulnohumeral dislocation associated with radial head fracture were studied two to 35 years after injury. On the basis of an objective functional grading score that included elements of pain, motion, strength, and stability, results were excellent in three (12%), good in 15 (62%), and fair in six (25%). The best results were obtained in patients with Mason Type 2 injuries treated by closed reduction without fracture excision and with early complete radial head excision for a Type 3 fracture. Late instability was not observed in any of the 24 patients. Prolonged immobilization (greater than four weeks) was associated with poor results. Ectopic ossification occurred in only one patient who had surgical treatment at eight days after injury; the grading score was only fair. These observations demonstrate that the injury should be treated with early reduction of the ulnohumeral joint and treatment of the radial head fracture according to its type. Immobilization for more than four weeks should be avoided. The prognosis is better than what has been thought previously.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The classification and treatment of heterotopic ossification about the elbow and forearm.

              Successful treatment of HO about the forearm and elbow relies on a working understanding of the risk factors, the pathophysiology and pathoanatomy, and the potential role for reconstructive procedures. These elements must be combined with a certain degree of flexibility in the approach to patients with a wide range of individual needs. Class I HO should be managed primarily with close observation, serial radiographs, and appropriate physical therapy regimens. The temporal relationship between the insult and the appearance of HO may modify the approach. When HO is noted within the first 6 weeks, use of anti-inflammatory agents is recommended; if the patient has developed limiting ectopic bone in the past, consideration should be given to a single dose of radiotherapy. In the 6-week to 3-month period, therapy is conducted to maintain full motion and an anti-inflammatory agent continued or started. We have not observed initial HO appearance after the third month. Class IIA HO can involve the anterior or posterior aspects of the elbow joint, or both. These groups are further divided into those limited by soft tissue (muscle and capsular contracture) and those blocked by bone (coronoid extension, humeroradial, humeroulnar, blocked olecranon fossa). The anterior group limited by soft tissue is addressed by capsulotomy, releases, and lengthenings. This group requires careful neurolysis and protection of vascular structures. For anterior bony bridges, resection is combined with capsulotomy. The location of the forearm "insertion" site of the new bone dictates alternative procedures such as interposition or radial head resection. The condition of the joint is usually preserved in these cases, but arthroplasty must always be considered when injury has led to joint derangement. Posteriorly, limitations in motion are caused by a contracted scarred triceps, capsular contracture, or bony impingement and synostosis. Treatment requires posterior capsular release and triceps tenolysis. Bridging bone is excised, the olecranon partially excised, and the olecranon fossa reestablished. Attempts should be made to preserve the fat pad of the olecranon fossa, which can act as an effective interposition material. Although characterized by limited pronosupination, class IIB HO can be located in any of the six distinct anatomic sites previously outlined. Simple resection, with or without interposition, is useful for a majority of the HO that is coincident with the interosseous membrane, but the areas at the proximal and distal extent of the forearm may demand special procedures to restore motion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rohit.arora@tirol-kliniken.at
                Journal
                J Orthop Surg Res
                J Orthop Surg Res
                Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-799X
                19 November 2022
                19 November 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 503
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.5361.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, , Medical University Innsbruck, ; Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                Article
                3394
                10.1186/s13018-022-03394-w
                9675101
                36403016
                3392d4a0-6b47-4b9c-b47f-15a87821e7e2
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 24 September 2022
                : 8 November 2022
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Surgery
                radial head fracture,on-table,mason,reconstruction,treatment,surgery,arthroplasty,radial head resection

                Comments

                Comment on this article